logo for the website of Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | RSS button | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search

2013 04 15: Symantec (makers and distributors of Norton Antivirus) and O2 now filter/block the website of Fathers for Life and *BOTH* of its affiliated blogs. Click for details.


 
 Site Map (very large file)
 Table of Contents
 Activism
 Children—Our most valued assets?
 Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
 Child Support
 Civil Rights & Social Issues
 Families
 Family Law
 Destruction of Families
 Fatherhood
 Fatherlessness
 Divorce Issues
 Domestic Violence
 Feminism
 Gay Issues
 Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
 Health
 Help Lines for Men
 History
 Humour
 Law, Justice and The Judiciary
 Mail to F4L
 Men's Issues
 Suicide
 The Politics of "Sex"
 Our Most Popular Pages
 Email List
 Links
 References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Be notified of
page updates
it's private
powered by
ChangeDetection

BADGE
 of
RECOGNITION

censored-stamp

Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blog are being slandered and censored. (Click for Details)

If you are a fathers-rights or pro-family activist, then it is quite likely that your website or blog is being, slandered and censored, too. (Click to check that out)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Hasbro, producer and distributor of toys, discriminates against boys!


Sep 28, 2002

Didn't the feminists insist all along that competition is the bane of a peaceful society, a sinister plot of the patriarchy?

Imagine how surprised I was to find this on Wired News today:

Sally Ride Toys With Engineering
(Making the Grade 2:00 a.m. PDT)

The first American woman in space has a new mission: Get more girls interested in science and engineering. To that end, Sally Ride is sponsoring a toy design competition for middle-schoolers. By Katie Dean.

A toy-design competition? Promoted by a feminist? How can that be? Is it for real?

Going to the "team rules", it becomes clear that this not a competition between any and all kids, but it is one designed to give girls a very heavy advantage over boys

"A team must have between 3 and 6 members, at least half of them girls."

That means that it's quite all right to have teams with three, two, one or no members who are boys, as long as at least between half to all of the team members are girls.

It means that competitions between girls' and boys' teams or between all-boys teams will be impossible, but that all-girls teams and teams with just one to three boys on them will be allowed to compete, as long as no more than half of any team is comprised of boys.

I suspect that the winner will be a team with boys on it, as such a team is more likely to be technically creative and advantaged. An all-boys' team is obviously too much competition; that must be why such teams are ruled out.  It would be irresponsible of any parent to let any child of his participate in the competition.  It is as bad and discriminatory as having Blacks ride in the back of the bus.

The footers of the toy-design-competition-pages at the site inform that:

TRANSFORMERS, TONKA, LITE BRITE, BARREL OF MONKEYS, CANDY LAND, SPIROGRAPH, MONOPOLY, PLAY-DOH AND MR. POTATO HEAD ARE TRADEMARKS OF HASBRO AND ARE USED WITH PERMISSION.

The web pages at the site are copyrighted by HASBRO.

HASBRO, SMITH COLLEGE, and Sally Ride Science Club are the sponsors of the ToyChallenge Competition.

Follow the links identified through the icons for the three "sponsors" of the toy-design competition and you get a first-hand impression of how the sexist promotion of a gender agenda is made to work at the middle-school level.

It's all done with impunity. Now wonder the girls shown in a photo at one of the web pages describing the competition stick out their tongues.

Who is interested in all those tech-toys anyway, girls or boys?  It is time to remind HASBRO and to write to them.

Walter

2002 09 28

Dear Hasbro,

Although our children are grown up now, they still have a need to buy toys for their children, and so do we. My wife and I have thirteen grandchildren, and we always took and still take great care in selecting the kind of toys our children and now our grandchildren received for presents.

We became aware of the sexist and discriminatory ToyChallenge competition launched by Sally Rider and sponsored by you. It is a competition that puts girls at an unfair advantage over boys. In consequence we will exercise greater care than usual and make sure that no toys produced and distributed by Hasbro will be bought by or for any of the members of our extended family.

We will gladly resume our traditional buying habits as soon as you demonstrate that you put an end to your sponsorship of Sally Rider's discriminatory scheme to advance girls over boys.

Sincerely,

Walter H. and Ruth Schneider

P.O. Box 62

Bruderheim, Alberta, Canada, T0B 0S0


Back to index of action items

White RoseThe White Rose
Thoughts are Free

__________________
Posted 2002 09 28