logo for the website of Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | RSS button | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search

2013 04 15: Symantec (makers and distributors of Norton Antivirus) and O2 now filter/block the website of Fathers for Life and *BOTH* of its affiliated blogs. Click for details.


 
 Site Map (very large file)
 Table of Contents
 Activism
 Children—Our most valued assets?
 Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
 Child Support
 Civil Rights & Social Issues
 Families
 Family Law
 Destruction of Families
 Fatherhood
 Fatherlessness
 Divorce Issues
 Domestic Violence
 Feminism
 Gay Issues
 Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
 Health
 Help Lines for Men
 History
 Humour
 Law, Justice and The Judiciary
 Mail to F4L
 Men's Issues
 Suicide
 The Politics of "Sex"
 Our Most Popular Pages
 Email List
 Links
 References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Be notified of
page updates
it's private
powered by
ChangeDetection

BADGE
 of
RECOGNITION

censored-stamp

Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blog are being slandered and censored. (Click for Details)

If you are a fathers-rights or pro-family activist, then it is quite likely that your website or blog is being, slandered and censored, too. (Click to check that out)

 
 
 
 

For The Children?


For The Children?

By Stephen Baskerville
CNSNews.com Commentary
November 05, 2002

[This article was published at Freecongress.org and at CNSNews.com.]


California Governor Gray Davis recently vetoed a bill that would have restored due process of law to thousands of wrongly-accused men. These men must pay the state's crushing child support for children whom DNA testing shows they did not father. He did it, naturally, "for the children."

Or so he says. More likely he did it for the federal money. In fact, Governor Davis confesses the bill would put California "at risk of losing up to $40 million in federal funds."

Given California's zeal in jailing men who cannot pay impossible child support burdens, it is inescapable that innocent men will go to jail to fill the state's coffers. (The state will then get more federal funding for the prisoners.)

Most child support orders are entered by default. The men never have a chance to prove their innocence and never know they are accused of fatherhood until they are ordered to pay. By then it is too late.

The injustice of forcing men to pay for children they did not father has kindled public indignation. But it is only the tip of the iceberg.

Child support was created for men who abandon the offspring they have sired, a relatively small number. But it has been hijacked by special interests and turned into a subsidy on divorce, forcing millions of men to pay for the stealing of their own children. In the case of false paternities, child support often subsidizes adultery.

States also receive federal payments based on how much child support passes through their hands. Officials therefore have an incentive to squeeze child support out of any parent (or non-parent) they can find. Like most states, California makes a tidy profit. Through federal taxes, we are all paying to subsidize divorce, unwed motherhood, and adultery. Our taxes make family breakdown profitable for state governments.

Those who defend the government enforcement of paternity fraud, wax eloquent about how fatherhood is more than just a sperm donation. A father is the man who has acted the part in the lives of the children, they say. But this too is dishonest.

Coerced child support is only required once the government has separated the children from their fathers, not while they are together. Nothing prevents the government from permitting the victims of a deception to continue living together as father and children. Many men are willing to do precisely this and to provide for the children as they see fit, like any other father. The issue is when can the government impute and enforce a financial obligation to any father, biological or not, who has done nothing to incur that obligation.

As often happens, one lie and one violation of rights necessitate even more. In their efforts to suppress the truth, governments in Britain and Australia are attempting to criminalize DNA testing in the privacy of one's home. This is merely one more step in the criminalization of fathers' relationships with their children.

No policy based upon lies, deceptions, and false accusations can benefit anyone: it cannot be good for the children, and it cannot be good for government ethics.

None of this is really "for the children"; it is for the grown-ups. Governor Davis does not love other people's children. But his government can make money off them. Once the government can exploit children for profit, the government will get children wherever it can find them. And no child is safe.

( Stephen Baskerville teaches political science at Howard University.)


Copyright 2002, Free Congress Foundation


Index to more of Stephen Baskerville's articles

Stephen Baskerville's website

See also:

Big Sister is Watching
By Robert T McQuaid

An epidemic of state-sponsored kidnapping feeds a tyrannical system hungry for revenues.  Child Protective Services and Children's Aid Societies systematically and increasingly often rob children from their parents.  Kafkaesque chicaneries that the targeted families find impossible to comply with are the tools used to keep the revenues rolling in.  Many families don't survive the ordeals that they are being subjected to by any given CPS or CAS.


White RoseThe White Rose
Thoughts are Free

__________________
Posted 2002 11 24