See also: The 1989 Montreal Massacre in the context of men's sacrifices, 2008 12 07, by Professor Jeffrey Asher.

Gender analysis enables gender to be integrated into every area of the policy process. It is most effective when applied at the beginning of the policy process but is also useful to review policies and programmes. [Original emphasis, Source: Our Work]

The NZ Women's ministry makes no bones about its discriminatory intentions:

From: The Framework [for gender analysis]

• provides the gender lens through which to view an initiative [my emphasis —WHS]
• is complementary to other policy guides, and therefore does not address all issues to be considered in the formulation of policy advice or service delivery [meaning that it will preferentially and exclusively address women's needs —WHS]
• is aimed at chief executives, policy managers and analysts, researchers, product and service designers and implementers to enhance their understanding of gender analysis, its benefits and how to undertake it
• reflects the Ministry of Women's Affairs' knowledge and experience gained over the past 10 years
• is the first attempt in New Zealand to describe the principles and practice of gender analysis. As gender analysis becomes more widely practised the Ministry will update these guidelines based on that experience and publish case studies which document its use.

Note: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the authors of the Communist Manifesto (1848/49), applied the term to mean societies or civilizations comprised of traditional nuclear families, families in which fathers are the breadwinners and figurative heads.  They held that a new and better socialist society cannot be constructed unless the concept of the traditional nuclear family is deconstructed and traditional families are abrogated. 
   Marx and Engels promoted that the productivity of all nations can be almost doubled if women are freed from the bonds of their families and the chores of child raising, with women then being free to be incorporated into the work force.  They called for the sexual needs of men and women to be satisfied through the concept of "free love" (today it is called sexual freedom), outside of the bounds of traditional marriage or at most in marriages that can be dissolved at will without assigning fault to one or the other partner.   Thereby they also thought that the social stigma of illegitimate children would fall by the way-side (every child a wanted child).  Children were to be raised in state-funded and -operated nurseries and daycare facilities.
   Many factions of the women's liberation movement wholeheartedly adopted Marx's and Engels' ideology, most of all radical feminism (a.k.a. Marxist-, Leninist-, or socialist-feminism), into which, beginning in the 1940s, communism increasingly transformed itself.  Radical feminism has since become the dominant political force in all developing and developed nations, and at the UN.

If the term "radical feminism" (a.k.a. Marxist- or socialist-feminism) is somewhat new to you, you need to expand your knowledge.  After all, radical feminism, the currently controlling faction of feminism, governs just about everything that is happening in your life.  See,

Carey Roberts column

Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on political correctness. His best-known work is an exposé on Marxism and the roots of radical feminism.

Carey Roberts' best-known work, his exposé on Marxism and the roots of radical feminism, is not necessarily easy to find, but this link will help with that. (Some of the URLs for the article series appear to keep changing.  For that reason the identified link leads to an Internet search for the series.  The first or second link in the return list will most likely lead you to the series.)

The eradication of the patriarchy so exceedingly dreaded by radical feminism must of necessity target primarily men.  See for example,

From the website of the The Soviet Story:

The film tells the story of the Soviet regime and how the Soviet Union helped Nazi Germany instigate the Holocaust.

“The Soviet Story” is a story of an Allied power which helped the Nazis to fight Jews and which slaughtered its own people on an industrial scale. Assisted by the West, this power triumphed on May 9th, 1945. Its crimes were made taboo, and the complete story of Europe’s most murderous regime has never been told. Until now…

DVDs of the documentary can be purchased through Amazon.com, but the documentary is also accessible free-of-charge on-line.

See a review of the documentary on the soviet holocaust or democide, the definition of democide being the extermination of a people by its government. It is estimated that during the height of the Stalinist purges, men comprised 98 percent of the 8-million people that were being exterminated in just two years, 1937 and 1938.

Therefore "rape statistics" in Canada now encompass allegations of crimes and criminal convictions for offences that range from uncorroborated charges of leering at a woman in a public swimming pool to rape with aggravated assault and murder.  That had a fine effect.  It raised statistics for incidents of "rape" to dizzying heights.  That is all the more so because feminists in non-government organization and in government make no distinction between reports of rape or sexual assault (allegations of crimes - innocent until proven guilty) and rape or sexual assault convictions.  Feminist propagandists make no distinction between allegations (as reported to police - plus estimated numbers of allegations in the order of the number equal to allegations reported to police) and convictions for criminal offences of a sexual nature against women.  It may come as a surprise to some that in almost 100 percent of all allegations of sexual offences against women the offenders are being found to be not guilty. The alleged offenders are being found guilty and sentenced accordingly in only about 1.9 percent of allegations in the U.S. and in about 6.9 percent of allegations in Canada. (More at the blog of Fathers for Life.)
   The difference in the conviction rates in the U.S. and in Canada is due to the greater extent to which the Canadian system of justice and classification of sexual offences is being influenced and controlled by feminist ideologists, to such a degree that U.S. social crtics already many years ago used Canadian jurisprudence as an example of feminist jurisprudence. (See Feminist Jurisprudence: Equal Rights or Neo-Paternalism, by Michael Weiss and Cathy Young; Cato Policy Analysis No. 256, June 19, 1996)

Note: Pederasty and other sodomitic sexual acts by adults with children are criminal acts.  In fact, they are statutory rape, because children are unable to give meaningful consent.  For that reason some homosexualists are engaged in bringing about legislation that lowers the age of sexual consent for children. In some countries the age of sexual consent for children engaged in homosexual acts has been lowered already to the age of 12.  Apparently it is thought that if laws lowering the age of sexual consent are enacted, that the maturity of children that enables them to give meaningful consent is thereby miraculously brought about. One thing is certain, though, the criminalization of sexual acts with children is thereby much reduced and perhaps eventually completely eliminated by declaring children of all ages sufficiently mature to engage in anything the lobbyists want them to engage in.
   Homosexual activists generally deny that that is their intention.   However, it is very rare that any of their members object to what is being done with respect to lowering the age of consent for children, and those who do object are quickly silenced by various means.
   What remains to be seen is any other logical explanation for lowering the age of consent for children who are being engaged in homosexual acts.  It is very puzzling that the play by Eve Ensler, "The Vagina Monologues," the latest major "cultural export" from the US, contains a very graphic glorification of statutory rape of a 12-year-old girl by a lesbian woman (in some later versions of the "play" the statutory rape scene and dialogue had been omitted).   What is even more curious is that many celebrities who are avowed opponents of child-sexual-abuse and even advertise their 'survivor' status, highly praised Eve Ensler's play.   (E. g.: Oprah Winfrey, who took "part in a Valentine's Day benefit performance of Eve Ensler's off-Broadway hit The Vagina Monologues to raise awareness of violence against women. )  So, what are we to make of that?  Is statutory rape by women not a criminal act in the eyes of women who are 'survivors' of child sexual abuse?  Is it not violence by women?   Apparently not in the eyes of some who uphold two standards of morals and laws governing them, one for men and one for women.