logo for the website of Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | RSS button | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search

2013 04 15: Symantec (makers and distributors of Norton Antivirus) and O2 now filter/block the website of Fathers for Life and *BOTH* of its affiliated blogs. Click for details.


 
 Site Map (very large file)
 Table of Contents
 Activism
 Children—Our most valued assets?
 Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
 Child Support
 Civil Rights & Social Issues
 Families
 Family Law
 Destruction of Families
 Fatherhood
 Fatherlessness
 Divorce Issues
 Domestic Violence
 Feminism
 Gay Issues
 Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
 Health
 Help Lines for Men
 History
 Humour
 Law, Justice and The Judiciary
 Mail to F4L
 Men's Issues
 Suicide
 The Politics of "Sex"
 Our Most Popular Pages
 Email List
 Links
 References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Be notified of
page updates
it's private
powered by
ChangeDetection

BADGE
 of
RECOGNITION

censored-stamp

Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blog are being slandered and censored. (Click for Details)

If you are a fathers-rights or pro-family activist, then it is quite likely that your website or blog is being, slandered and censored, too. (Click to check that out)

 
 
 
 

Kinsey — Consequences of the Sexual Revolution 


Consequences

Kids And Sex: The Kinsey Connection, by Vanessa Warner, Research Specialist and Trudy Hutchens, Director of Research and Publications:

    "How did Kinsey come to the conclusion that children are sexual? That is the most frightening aspect of his story. Kinsey was a silent partner in the molestation of 317 children [at the very least].  In chapter five of his 1948 report on the human male, Tables 30-34 present data on children's orgasms—beginning with five-month-old infants.  See Table 34."

From Knox v. The United States: Legal Update — Attorney General Janet Reno's Effort to Legalize a Special Class of Child Pornography:

    Background

    "I would like to use the law of the land to do everything I possibly can to protect America's children from abuse and violence ..."

    Janet Reno, at the White House
    February 11, 1993

    Within months of Janet Reno's promise to "protect our children from abuse," the Clinton Administration's Justice Department filed a brief in United States v. Knox in favor of overturning a lower court conviction of Knox.  The Justice Department position, if adopted, would relax the higher standards of the Child Protection Act of 1984 and make it significantly more difficult for prosecutors to obtain convictions of child pornographers.  The Reno Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to reinterpret the federal child pornography statute in a way that will result in legalizing a substantial amount of child pornography, encouraging further criminal child exploitation.  This action sends a clear message to pornographers and pedophiles that the Reno Justice Department will no longer vigorously prosecute much of the child pornography that is now flooding America.

    Stephen Knox, a prior offender, was convicted of pos[t]ing and receiving child pornography through the mail. Federal agents searching Knox's home seized videotapes with titles like Ripe and Tender, Young Flashers, and Sweet Young Things.  According to the U.S. Court of Appeals, which found Knox guilty, three videotapes at the heart of this case exhibited girls clothed in skimpy attire or underpanties, "between the ages of ten and seventeen, striking provocative poses for the camera. ... The photographer would zoom in on the children's pubic and genital area and display a close-up view for an extended period of time. The films themselves clearly were designed to pander to pedophiles." One video advertisement leered, "It's almost like seeing them naked (some say even better)."

    Full Story

Previous   Next

____________
Updates:
2001 02 04 (format changes)