logo for the website of Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | RSS button | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search

2013 04 15: Symantec (makers and distributors of Norton Antivirus) and O2 now filter/block the website of Fathers for Life and *BOTH* of its affiliated blogs. Click for details.


 
 Site Map (very large file)
 Table of Contents
 Activism
 Children—Our most valued assets?
 Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
 Child Support
 Civil Rights & Social Issues
 Families
 Family Law
 Destruction of Families
 Fatherhood
 Fatherlessness
 Divorce Issues
 Domestic Violence
 Feminism
 Gay Issues
 Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
 Health
 Help Lines for Men
 History
 Humour
 Law, Justice and The Judiciary
 Mail to F4L
 Men's Issues
 Suicide
 The Politics of "Sex"
 Our Most Popular Pages
 Email List
 Links
 References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Be notified of
page updates
it's private
powered by
ChangeDetection

BADGE
 of
RECOGNITION

censored-stamp

Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blog are being slandered and censored. (Click for Details)

If you are a fathers-rights or pro-family activist, then it is quite likely that your website or blog is being, slandered and censored, too. (Click to check that out)

 
 
 
 

The Wicked Witch of the West Lives


Poster: The Wicked Witch of the West Lives
The UN Gender Agenda

Napoleon said that he feared four hostile newspapers more than 100,000 hostile bayonets, but of far greater concern to us should be the Marxist roots of the ideologies that are making over our society and that Lenin had said, "Destroy the family and society will collapse, " and "Give me your four-year olds and in a generation I will build a socialist State."

At the founding of the UN, the importance of the natural family was recognized and declared to be worth protecting and promoting.  Families were thought to be the fundamental building blocks of nations.

But, things changed.

The strongest force seeking to destroy traditional  religions is feminism.  Radical feminists have little use  for religion or churches as they are, but they do not leave the churches whose doctrines and liturgies they find objectionable.  They work within to change the churches so that the final product will bear little resemblance to Christianity.

— Robert H. Bork in Slouching Towards Gomorrah (p. 287)

The preceding excerpt from Slouching Towards Gomorrah feminist logic: It's not fascism when we do it!is from Chapter 11 The Politics of Sex: Radical Feminism's Assault on American Culture.
    That chapter from Robert Bork's book provides insights as to why gender feminism is bad for our society in as  much as it fosters a climate of propaganda against men and all things male that would earn the accolades of Josef Goebbels for a job well-done.
    Robert H. Bork did not mention much that what is at work in the USA is also at work at the UN and therefore affects every nation on Earth.

    If the term "radical feminism" (a.k.a. Marxist- or socialist-feminism) is somewhat new to you, you need to expand your knowledge.  After all, radical feminism, the currently controlling faction of feminism, governs just about everything that is happening in your life.  See,

Carey Roberts column

Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on political correctness. His best-known work is an exposé on Marxism and the roots of radical feminism.

Carey Roberts' best-known work, his exposé on Marxism and the roots of radical feminism, is not necessarily easy to find, but this link will help with that. (Some of the URLs for the article series appear to keep changing.  For that reason the identified link leads to an Internet search for the series.  The first or second link in the return list will most likely lead you to the series.)

Government-funded special interest groups, also called non-governmental organizations (NGOs), gained control at the UN and wage an all-out war on the family.  These NGOs are driven by redfem extremists who hate families and attack the natural family by destroying its weakest link, fatherhood and the role of men as heads of families.
    Family-hostile legislation that would never pass in many national legislative assemblies is being promoted through UN resolutions that then are brought through the back door into the UN member-nations, by passing administrative orders or orders-in-council, often on the sly, without legislative bodies even being aware that the UN resolutions are becoming law in their countries.  However, even if the legislative bodies know about the destructive agenda of the UN that is being imposed on their countries, they are often powerless to oppose it.  

misogyny: "a widely accepted social attitude in a sexist world" includes beliefs that "demean [women's] bodies... characters and... efforts."
misandry:"1) a refusal to suppress the evidence of one's experience with men;
  2) a woman's defense against fear and pain;
  3) an affirmation of the cathartic effects of justifiable anger."

— from A Feminist Dictionary
compiled by Cheris Kramarae and Paula Treichler;
quoted in Jack Kammer's
"If Men Have All the Power How Come Women Make the Rules"
(Translation into French)

(Note: Just so there's no mistaking the true meanings of the terms, look up the proper definitions of misogyny and misandry.)

As with the Nazis, who first vilified and demeaned the targets of their ethnic cleansing, so the radical feminists (a.k.a. redfems) now demean the targets of their wrath — men.  The gender agenda then progresses to the elimination of fathers from the lives of the fathers' children.
    Today's radical ideologues demand that we do it all "in the best interest of the child."  Even that is nothing new.  Many ideologues, from Socrates, through  Napoleon, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin to Mao, all used variations of the same theme.  In the communist ideology that was first being discussed by Socrates and then defined through the efforts of Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx (the fathers of modern communism) there was no room for the natural family.  The natural family was seen by them as the fundamental source of all class struggle, even as the cause of the idea of personal property.  Therefore they openly called for the destruction of the natural family and for state-control and -ownership of the children.
    Today's redfems and gender activists are promoting the original communist family politics, even to the extent of having the State gain control of the upbringing of our children.  The UN are exerting enormous pressure on many nations to implement government-sponsored daycare for children, even for children under three years of age.
    There too, they are perpetuating destructive family politics that proved to be enormously harmful to the development of children in the communist countries.

To gain an impression of how effective such a program is and what its consequences are, check PROPAGANDA IN THE PROPAGANDA STATE [the USSR]

...For those Marxists who insisted on creating the world's first classless society, children meant everything. Adults would repeat, "Under communism there is only one privileged class — the children.

Stalin and his circle declared a war (as in the civil war) against the counter-revolutionary forces, traditional peasants, and called the young to the front lines.  Often Pioneers confronted a familiar enemy: their parents." [The Pioneers were the children in the Russian youth movement.  They were encouraged to rat on their parents and depicted as heroes if they did. --WHS]

See also Matriarchy in USSR — off-site

Where did all of that come from?  The Greek culture of antiquity was idolized during the Renaissance and in the aftermath of the French Revolution, when humanism was thought to offer a viable, better and more enlightened alternative to the established moral traditions that were being promoted through the established religious denominations.  Humanism evolved into communism, mainly on account of the quality of the education curriculum that was then available.  The people who promoted the new godless statism were educated well enough that they could read Socrates, Plato and Aristotle in the original languages in which they wrote, and the study of the classical culture was very much in vogue then.

Plato, in "Republic," has Socrates offer this advice to philosopher kings: take all the children from their parents  and rid the city of adults.

Napoleon, and the founders of the Wandervogel ("bird of passage", the enormously popular youth movement that began in about 1880 in Germany and produced many of the prominent (and homosexual) Nazi leaders, used the slogan "Who owns the youths owns the future."

Lenin said, "Give me your four-year-olds, and within one generation I will build a socialist state."

Hitler said, in Mein Kampf: "It [the State] must set race in the center of all life. It must take care to keep it pure. It must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. It must  see to it that only the healthy beget children...."

"President Obama is committed to helping states develop seamless, comprehensive, and coordinated 'Zero to Five' systems to improve developmental outcomes and early learning for all children....it will be the goal of this Administration to ensure that every child has access to a complete and competitive education -- from the day they are born to the day they begin a career."

— (Fact Sheet: Expanding the Promise of Education in America, Mar 10, 2009
see also:
Remarks of President Barack Obama —
As Prepared for Delivery Address to Joint Session of Congress, Tuesday, February 24th, 2009)

All of those ideas are now very much a part of the gender agenda promoted through the UN, and the gender agenda is an outcome of women's studies programs that are being controlled by feminist sociologist who proudly wear the badge of being Marxist.
    And even a variation of Hitler's program of ethnic cleansing is being promoted through the UN, because the population control measures imposed on many nations on Earth are being imposed through political and financial blackmail and coercion primarily in the underdeveloped countries.  The darker the colour of the skin of its citizens, the more actively the UN imposes its population control measures in a given country.
    The population control measures imposed by the UN don't stop anymore at attaining Zero Population Growth.  No, the newest goal for the reduction of the population of the world is to bring the population down to the levels that existed at the time of Columbus -- 300 to 500 million people.  Families are an obstacle to achieving that goal.

See The Demographics of Death, or The Decline & Fall of the Human Empire

All that opposes the destructive gender agenda of the UN it this reasonable definition of the family, and through the efforts of the gender agenda is now being abolished:

The "family" in all ages and in all corners of the globe can be defined as a man and a woman bonded together through a socially approved covenant of marriage to regulate sexuality, to bear, raise, and protect children, to provide mutual care and protection, to create a small home economy, and to maintain continuity between the generations, those going before and those coming after. It is out of the reciprocal, naturally recreated relations of the family that the broader communities—such as tribes, villages, peoples, and nations—grow.

— Dale O'Leary, The Gender Agenda, p. 24,
original source: Allan Carlson,
What's Wrong With the United Nations Definition of 'Family'?
in The Family in America (August 1994), p. 3

The following is the recipe for the corruption of our children that appears to be used by the people promoting the gender agenda.

  • Corrupt the young, get them away from religion.  Get them interested in sex. 

  • Make them superficial, destroy their  ruggedness.

  • Get control of all means of publicity and thereby: Get the peoples' mind off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books and plays, and other trivialities.

  • Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance.

  • Destroy the peoples faith in their natural leaders by holding up the latter to ridicule, contempt and obloquy.

  • Always preach true democracy but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible.

  • Encourage government extravagance, destroy its credit, produce fear with rising prices, inflation and general discontent.

  • Foment unnecessary strikes in vital industries, encourage civil disorders and foster a soft and lenient attitude on the part of government towards such disorders.

  • By specious argument cause the breakdown of the old moral virtues: honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.

  • Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with the view of confiscating them and leaving the population defenseless." 

      — Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (so some say)

Note: A purported history of the origins is given at the URL.  Original source document unknown --WHS

The web page (one of a few) at which that text is located — a text that was supposedly obtained in a raid by allied military intelligence officers in Duesseldorf, Germany, in 1919 at the offices of a communist organization — states that it was published in a Florida newspaper, in 1920.
    However, it is somewhat doubtful that the purported circumstances of obtaining the leaflet that is said to have been the source of the text are accurately reported.
    Duesseldorf is the place of my birth.  I grew up there,  It was my home town.  It was not occupied by Allied Forces in 1919, contrary to what the report at the indicated web page identifies.  Duesseldorf is on the eastern bank on the River Rhine, and only the parts of Germany that were on the western bank of the River Rhine were occupied in 1919.  Not until 1921 did French armed forces occupy Duesseldorf, as part of their actions that were intended to enforce that reparation payments (in the form of shipments of coal from the Ruhr Valley to France) would be made by Germany.

Whatever the source of the text may be, the items listed in it most certainly and accurately define the dimensions of the gender agenda, don't they?


Additional Reading:

  • A Modern Man's Guide to Day Care

Should Mom go back to work? Should you? What kind of childhood will your kid get? It's the decision that makes most men want to run for cover.

by Tom Zoellner

Full Story

The protectors of women time and again praise to 'Wessi' (Westie) women the wonderfully complete world of the 'Ossi' (Eastie) women, ever since the end of the GDR, whose all-encompassing children-cr—che system secured full-time earning potential and thereby the personal freedom of mothers.

What a full-day program for the children of fully-employed looks like has been thoroughly experienced by the mothers of the former GDR. Marlene, herself a cr—che-child and subsequently an educator for child-educatoresses from Potsdam, told it to me. [Full Story]

— Karin J—ckel
Germany devours its children — Families today: Exploited and burned out

Neo Nazis and other overt hate groups are amateurs. THE HATE MONGERS explains how some elements of the women movement use lies and hate to make big money for themselves, and how they harm our culture and our economy.

Read THE HATE MONGERS

Updates:
2001 12 26 (added links to information on daycare)
2004 12 09 (page reformated)
2005 01 31 (changed link to Tom Zoellner's article on daycare)
2005 03 28 (added reference to the communist origins of the history of daycare)
2006 03 04 (added link to Feminism for Male College Students)