logo for the website of Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | RSS button | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search

2013 04 15: Symantec (makers and distributors of Norton Antivirus) and O2 now filter/block the website of Fathers for Life and *BOTH* of its affiliated blogs. Click for details.


 
 Site Map (very large file)
 Table of Contents
 Activism
 Children—Our most valued assets?
 Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
 Child Support
 Civil Rights & Social Issues
 Families
 Family Law
 Destruction of Families
 Fatherhood
 Fatherlessness
 Divorce Issues
 Domestic Violence
 Feminism
 Gay Issues
 Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
 Health
 Help Lines for Men
 History
 Humour
 Law, Justice and The Judiciary
 Mail to F4L
 Men's Issues
 Suicide
 The Politics of "Sex"
 Our Most Popular Pages
 Email List
 Links
 References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Be notified of
page updates
it's private
powered by
ChangeDetection

BADGE
 of
RECOGNITION

censored-stamp

Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blog are being slandered and censored. (Click for Details)

If you are a fathers-rights or pro-family activist, then it is quite likely that your website or blog is being, slandered and censored, too. (Click to check that out)

 
 
 

Dairy Queen loses profits due to population control


-----Original Message-----
From: Population Research Institute [mailto:pri@pop.org]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:48 AM
To: Population Research Institute
Subject: PRI Weekly Briefing: Proposal to Warren Buffett

Dear Colleague:

This past Saturday I met Warren Buffett, Chairman of Berkshire-Hathaway, and the world’s second richest man, and delivered the following resolution to him and 10,000 Berkshire-Hathaway shareholders.

Steve Mosher
President

PRI Weekly Briefing, 6 May 2002, Vol. 4/ No. 10

Chairman Buffett, Shareholders of Berkshire-Hathaway,

My name is Steven Mosher, and I am the President of Population Research Institute, a nonprofit organization dedicated to making the case for people as the ultimate resource—the one resource that we as investors cannot do without—and debunking the hype about overpopulation, what the New York Times has called, and I quote, one of the "myths of the twentieth century."

I have written about the coming depopulation—that’s right, I said the coming de-population—in the Wall Street Journal and other publications. I say this to explain why Gloria Patrick, a Berkshire-Hathaway shareholder, has asked me to present for action at this meeting the following proposal.

I will present the proposal and then, with the Chairman’s indulgence, spend a couple of minutes explaining why it is necessary:

Here is the resolution:

Whereas, charitable contributions should serve to enhance shareholder value;

Whereas, the company has given money to groups involved in controversial activities like abortion and population control;

Whereas, our company is dependent on people to buy the products and services of the various companies we own;

Whereas, our company is being boycotted by Life Decisions International and investment-related groups like Pro-Vita Advisors because of our contributions;

Resolved: The shareholders request the company to refrain from making charitable contributions.


To take these point by point:

Shareholder money is entrusted to the Board of Directors to be invested in a prudent manner for the shareholders.

I think you all will agree, as the resolution states, that charitable contributions should serve to enhance shareholder value. Indeed this is already Berkshire-Hathaway’s policy with regard to its operating subsidiaries. As Chairman Buffet explained in his Chairman’s letter of 2001, "We trust our managers to make gifts in a manner that delivers commensurate tangible or intangible benefits to the operations they manage." We did not invest money in this company so it could be given to someone else’s favorite charity.

You will all likewise agree that activities like population control and abortion are controversial. In fact, some of the charitable money has been given to Planned Parenthood, a group that is responsible for almost two hundred thousand abortions a year in the United States alone, and in countless more through its population control programs worldwide. We believe that abortion is the taking of a human life. Even if you disagree on this fundamental point, however, you must concur that these ongoing boycotts of Berkshire-Hathaway company products are not a good thing.

It should be self-evident that Berkshire-Hathaway, like the economy as a whole, is dependent upon people. It is people who produce the products and services of the various companies we own, and it is people who buy them. Now you may think that there is a superabundance of people, and that we will never run short, but this is not true. Half the countries of the world—including countries in Latin America, Africa, and Asia—have birthrates below replacement. Europe and Japan are literally dying, filling more coffins than cradles each year.

Dying populations may shrink the economic pie. We already see this happening in Japan and some European countries: How much of Japan’s continuing economic malaise can be directly traced to a lack of young people to power the economy? They may also make economic development nearly impossible: Russia is having trouble finding its feet economically in part because of its demographic collapse.(1) These problems will spread to many more countries in the near future.

Charitable contributions to simple-minded population control programs, in which governments impose restrictions on childbearing, are not in Berkshire-Hathaway’s interest. Such programs are not "investing in humanity’s future," they are compromising humanity’s future, and putting a roadblock in the way of future economic growth. There is no "global share buyback" in store for those who fund population control programs, because such programs will rob the world of future consumers and producers and threaten to shrink the economic pie.

Let me give you a concrete example of what I mean. Berkshire-Hathaway owns Dairy Queen, and there are 103 Dairy Queens in Thailand.(2) But Thailand, due to a massive sterilization and contraception campaign supported by Planned Parenthood and other population control groups, now has a birthrate that is below replacement—and falling. This means that its cohorts of children are shrinking, that there will be fewer and fewer young families in the years to come, and that its population will eventually fall.(3) Now you may think that Thailand has too many children. But is it possible for there to be too many children for Dairy Queen? According to Dairy Queen, "The Dairy Queen concept especially appeals to… young families," but there will be fewer young families in Thailand’s, and Dairy Queens future, because of population control.(4)

So I urge you to vote yes on this resolution. Let it be resolved that this company refrain from making charitable contributions.

Should you, on the other hand, vote to continue the current practice of making charitable contributions based on shareholder designations, I would urge you all to designate 501(c)3s, like the Population Research Institute, which are attempting to help the poor become the agents of their own development, and not simply try to reduce their number through population control.

ENDNOTES

  1. See: "‘Overpopulation’ Turns Out to Be Overhyped," Ben Wattenburg, The Wall Street Journal, 4 March 2002; or "Too Many People? Not by a Long Shot," Steven W. Mosher, The Wall Street Journal, 10 February 1997.

  2. Dairy Queen: International Locations,

  3. World Population Prospects, The 2000 Revision, Thailand, p. 433.

  4. www.dairyqueen.com.

______________________________
Steve Mosher is the president of Population Research Institute, a non-profit organization dedicated to debunking the myth that the world is overpopulated.

2002 Population Research Institute. Permission to reprint granted.

Redistribute widely. Credit requested.

____________________________
To subscribe to the Weekly Briefing,
send an email to: JOIN-PRI@Pluto.Sparklist.Com.

_____________________________
The Population Research Institute is committed to ending human rights abuses committed in the name of "family planning," and to ending counter-productive social and economic paradigms premised on the myth of "overpopulation."

____________________________
Population Research Institute
1190 Progress Drive, Suite 2D
P.O. Box 1559
Front Royal, VA 22630

USA

http://www.pop.org

Media Contact: Scott Weinberg

540-622-5240, ext. 209


See also:

World Population Control — U.S. Strategy and UN Policy Program
An overview compiled from various sources, based on various opinions relating to the consequences of the U.S.-promoted culture of death resulting from National Security Study Memorandum 200, by Henry A. Kissinger, National Security Council, Washington, D.C. 20506, April 24, 1974.

Parents' rights a demographic issue, by COLIN P.A. JONES, Special to The Japan Times, Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Is the world overpopulated?

If all of the world's people were located in the Province of Alberta (just a touch smaller in area than the State of Texas) and each were to have an equal share of all of the land in Alberta, then each of the world's people would have 98.6m2 of land to live on.

Assuming that the average household consists of three people, a family of three would have enough space (3,184 ft2) for a moderately-sized house and a garden large enough to grow some of the food consumed by the family.

  • Alberta land area: 661,565 km2, 255,541 miles2
  • World population: 6,706,993,152 (Source: CIA World Factbook, July 2008 est.)

It is obvious that the world's population density will be the controlling factor.  Is that a problem?  Will people any time soon be standing on each other's shoulders? 

How can the world be overpopulated if it is possible to fit the world population, fairly comfortably, into a province the size of Alberta or a state the size of Texas,  even if we divide the whole population into families of three and give each a bungalow and a good-sized garden to boot?

The following table list a number of nations, ranked by their population densities. 

 A table of population densities of various countries, with columns for country, area, population, and population density per km^2

Does anyone seeing those numbers still think that the world is overpopulated?

White RoseThe White Rose
Thoughts are Free

__________________
Posted 2002 01 05
Updates:
2002 07 11 (added link to article on U.S.-sponsored world population control)