
|
 |
 |
The execution of men who show cowardice in the face of the
enemy
To Preserve and Protect — Examining a century of men and war and the 'changing' role of women in it
Preceding Page
This page:
- Haig order 'to shoot officers who falter'
- THE WIDOW'S PARTY, by
Rudyard Kipling
- My brother Hans, just prior
to being taken a PoW, at age 17 (an excerpt from his diary)
Appendix
Haig order 'to shoot officers who falter'
By York Membery[Original
Article]
FIRST World War court-martials were pressed to show no mercy to officers
convicted of desertion and cowardice, according to new evidence.
The findings add weight to the argument backed by some military historians that a
number of death sentences imposed by the British Army between 1914 and 1918 were flawed
and should be reviewed. Previously unpublished diaries of Maj Gen Sir Aylmer Haldane
record a conference presided over by Lt Gen Sir Edmund Allenby, the commander of the Third
Army, in the autumn of 1916, as the disastrous Somme offensive was grinding to a halt.
Haldane writes in his private journal of how Allenby read out a confidential GHQ
[General Headquarters] paper expressing concern that officers were being shown "too
much leniency" for military offences "for which men [the ranks] were being
shot".
The historian Lawrence James, who uncovered the diary entry while researching for a new
book, Warrior Race: The British Experience of War, says in the forthcoming issue of BBC
History Magazine: "The inference is unmistakable. [Earl] Haig, the Commander in
Chief, wanted no mercy shown to officers who faltered - understandable, given that his
strategy depended on an army suffused with offensive spirit.
"Officers were expected to set an example in the suppression of fear; if they
flinched, their men would panic. Fear, like courage, was thought to be contagious.
Top-level pressure for exemplary death sentences was transmitted downwards in an army
where only officers with an aggressive spirit secured promotion. Arms were twisted in a
denial of basic justice."
More than 300 British soldiers were executed during the First World War for military
offences such as desertion and cowardice in the face of the enemy, although 10 times that
many were sentenced to death. By contrast, the Germans executed only 18 of their own men
for similar offences during the war, despite having an army twice the size of the British.[1]
The fact that only a handful of British officers were executed suggests that Allenby's
directive was not widely enforced. However, news of the diary entry was welcomed by Shot
at Dawn, an organisation which campaigns for posthumous pardons for "deserters"
who were executed - many of whom are now believed to have been suffering from shell shock
or to have been trying their best to carry out orders in the chaos of the trenches.
"This can only help our campaign to clear the names of officers shot by British
soldiers during the war," said John Hipkin, the founder of Shot at Dawn. He is
currently campaigning for a pardon to be given to two officers shot during the conflict:
Sub-Lt Edwin Dyett (whose last words were: "For God's sake, shoot straight!")
and 2nd Lieut Eric Poole. The organisation believes that both men were unjustly executed.
"They were sacrificial lambs - shot simply to make it look as if the Army was being
impartial," said Mr Hipkin.
In the case of Dyett, who was lost for 24 hours in the smoke and confusion of war
before reappearing at his brigade HQ to be accused of desertion, the court martial
recommended mercy owing to his age (21), inexperience of operations and the confusing
circumstances. However, the general in charge of his case said Dyett should be killed
because "if a private had behaved as he did in such circumstances it is highly
probable that he would be shot".
Field Marshal Haig simply noted "Confirmed" on the file. "The irony is
that it wasn't even an effective policy" said Niall Ferguson, a history professor at
Oxford University and the author of The Pity of War. "In the Second World War, when
there were no executions, desertion rates were actually lower." A Ministry of Defence
spokesman said: "We cannot make any comment before examining the evidence."
Related articles: 5
January 2001: Public pays its respects to the First World War deserters
4
February 2000: Villagers against adding deserter's name to memorial
30
April 1998: No pardon for deserters shot in Great War
18
September 1997: Place of honour for true hero shot as coward
28
May 1997: Soldiers executed for cowardice could be pardoned 80 years on
|
THE
WIDOW'S PARTY
By Rudyard
Kipling
"Where have you been this while away, Johnnie, Johnnie?"
Out with the rest on a picnic lay.
Johnnie, my Johnnie, aha!
They called us out from the barrack-yard
To Gawd knows where from Gosport Hard,
And you can't refuse when you get the card,
And the Widow give the party.
(Bugle: Ta-rara-ra-ra-rara!)
"What did you get to eat and drink, Johnnie, Johnnie?" '
Standing water as thick as ink,
Johnnie, my Johnnie, aha!
A bit o' beef that were three year stored,
A bit o' mutton as tough as a board,
And a fowl we killed with a sergeant's sword,
When the Widow give the party.
"What did you do for knives and forks, Johnnie, Johnnie?"
We carries 'em with us wherever we walks,
Johnnie, my Johnnie, aha!
And some was sliced and some was halved,
And some was crimped and some was carved,
And some was gutted and some was starved,
When the Widow give the party.
"What ha' you done with half your mess, Johnnie, Johnnie?"
They couldn't do more and they wouldn't do less.
Johnnie, my Johnnie, aha!
They ate their whack and they drank their fill,
And I think the rations has made them ill,
For half my comp'ny's lying still,
Where the Widow give the party.
"What was the end of all of the show, Johnnie, Johnnie?"
Ask my Colonel, for I don't know,
Johnnie, my Johnnie, aha!
We broke a King and we built a road
A court-house stands where the Reg'ment goed.
And the river's clean where the raw blood flowed.
When the Widow give the party.
(Bugle: Tarara-ra-ra-rara!)
|
....Up at the front a heavy artillery barrage is in
progress. Our advanced observer and his buddy came back wounded. We have enormous luck.
The edge of the barrage is about 400m in front of us.
This morning, it must have been about 5:00am, the order from the battalion command post
came: The six flag-ensigns of the mortar platoon are to report immediately at the
battalion command post. We knew what that meant; a number of men had been called off a few
days ago in the same manner. That means, we will be distributed to the other paratrooper
companies and will come into service as infantry....
Shortly before our departure we met Hüter, who had remained with Rummenhöller, Trimborn
and Baum as messengers with the staff. Trimborn has been killed, Rummenhöller and Baum
missing in action, Wittpennig lost an arm. All flag-ensigns of inspection group Frieda,
with one exception, captured, dead or wounded. It felt as if I was being choked:
Rummenhöller, Trimborn, Wittpennig, the good Wittpennig who had always enjoyed life so
much. It all sounded so strange, so improbable....
Hans Schneider, in Italy,
from his diary entry for 1945 04 19
(A few days before he was taken POW.
He was a few months short of turning 18 WHS) |
Aditional Reading
An Exclusive and
Insightful Interview with Angry Harry!, by Angry Harry, (2001 10 16)
What a Piece of Shit is Man,
by Angry Harry (2001 12 14)
_______________
Notes:
- In Terrible Judges Criminal Death-Sentences by German
Military Courts (1998), Otto Gritschneder states the following:
Accused: The Judge
More precisely, the German Military Courts that operated during the second world war.
During those six years the USA pronounced one death sentence by a military court,
other allies two to four, Great Britain not a single one. Judges of the German Armed
Forces, it is estimated, pronounced 50,000 death sentences, of which about 20,000 were
executed. One of the last ones was against 20-year-old Navy radio operator Alfred
Gail, even two days after the capitulation, on May 10, 1945, on board of a ship:
In total there were three death-candidates that were executed through a salvo of shots,
after they had been bound together and their eyes had been tied; their corpses were sunk
into the sea. The decision of the Nazi Military Court is not available anymore.
However, a 121-page type-written transcript of [a] Feb. 27, 1953 court decision
([50]15/52) describes the case in extensive detail. The three Nazi military judges
and Chief Justice Petersen were exonerated. The reasoning for absolving the judges
is unfathomable for normal minds, but it fits the German judicial practices of that
time...
Translated from an excerpt at
Die Gazette
Nr. 8, November 1998
Terrible Judges Criminal Death-Sentences by German Military Courts, by
Otto Gritschneder, recounts the case histories of 28 military death sentences during the
Nazi regime.
Otto Gritschneder describes the German post-war judicial system which
welcomed the former Nazi judges with open arms by stating "The black-white-red
swastika-poisoning of the federal German justice system resulted in scandalous decisions
that the Nazis acknowledge with derisive sneers in each case." (Translated from an interview.)
Who falls asleep in a democracy will wake up in a
dictatorship.
Otto Gritschneder,
(when asked why he wants to publicize the system of terror in German military justice
under the Nazis)
The two statements were derived from data made
available at the International
Database of the U.S. Bureau of the Census. The numbers are relative
to what men's loss of life would have been if the risks they were exposed to would have
been equal to those experienced by women.
Hilary Clinton: "Women have always
been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in
combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often
the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in todays warfare,
victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the
children." in a speech
at the First Ladies Conference on Domestic Violence, San Salvador, El Salvador,
November 17, 1998
A question arises out of that. If Hilary Clinton is so terribly
concerned about all the poor women who have to raise children all by themselves, how come
she does so much to fuel the war against the family, a war that deprives far greater
numbers of women and children of husbands and fathers now and each year than any war
during the last century ever did?
Well, things could be worse. Let's be grateful she's only a junior
senator and not a military justice.
The point made by Hillary Clinton was made even more forcefully by
Louise Arbour, former Canadian Supreme Court Justice, now involved in
the persecution of Bosnian war criminals at the International War Crimes
Tribunal in The Hague, when she commented on the mass murder of Croatian
men:
"My mental image of a mass grave was that
it would be more of a trench, where the bodies would be lined up
almost in file," she recalled last week. "But these bodies were
thrown together indiscriminately in a hole. Then I noticed their
clothes. They were young men, and the first thing I thought about
was their mothers." Arbour is a mother of three herself, although
"it would be too corny, too sentimental, to suggest that you go back
to work suddenly fired up. But it made the tragedy very human, and
that's not something you get here in the office every day. I watched
the bodies come out of the ground and it was like they were coming
alive again. They were demanding to be identified. They were
demanding," she said, and there was not even a hint of
sentimentality in her voice, "that their mothers be told." (Full
Story)
See how that works? We must not mourn
the men who lost their lives. We must not have concern about the tortures they experienced
and their killing. We must mourn the pain of the mothers who lost
their sons, for the simple reason that the primary victims
of that war were the mothers who lost their children. The
children, especially given that they were almost exclusively men who
were killed, are not what matters as much as does the pain of their
mothers who survived and are therefore the primary victims of the Bosnian
War.
Back to Ideology in Art__________________
Posted 2001 02 11
Updates:
2003 04 09 (reformatted to break page up into several pages)
2007 06 30 (reformatted page to comply with standard layout)
2007 11 05 (reformatted and made minor edits)
2013 02 20 (added page index table and corresponding bookmarks) |
|
|