|
Why is Communism worse than Capitalism? Part 1
From Aaron Burr's e-mail discussion list; 2003 04 24[Note:
To better understand the context of the discussion in the following, it will be a good
idea to look up the related diagrams of the
patriarchal versus the feminist family model. They are simple, and easily understood
and memorized. —WHS]
The real power in this country has been on the Right for a hundred
years or more, and it could be argued rightfully so due to the threat of communism.
Why is Communism worse than Capitalism?
Dear People,
This is a VERY important legal and sociological question to the Father's Rights movement.
First, we must identify things. Feminism is "communism." Know
that Feminism, Socialism, Communism, and Fascism have different elemental definitions
which differentiate one from the other. They are not the same – however; they
all come from the same root. The best explanation I have come up with is that they
are all the same plant, in different stages of growth. A weed is still a weed, no
matter how small or tall it tends to grow.
Feminism, is socialism, which leads to Communism. The father's rights movement
does not understand that Capitalism and Socialism/Communism are completely
different. Like matter and anti-matter – they cannot occupy the same space or
territory together.
Feminism/Socialism/Communism's main dictate is tribal in nature (Hillary Clinton's
"Village").
Marxism and Feminism are one, and that one is
Marxism.
—Heidi Hartmann and Amy Bridges,
The unhappy marriage of Marxism and Feminism. Chapt. 1.
Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the
same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism."
—Toward a Feminist Theory of the State,
Catharine A. MacKinnon, 1989, First Harvard University Press Page 10.
Its first mandate is to control mankind's free will and the resources of economic
development. Know that Marx's and Engels' first goal was to deconstruct both the
home and family. This is the first LAW of Feminism and socialism/communism: destroy
the rule of the father. From Chapter Three of my book:
We must understand, that feminism, is socialism/communism.[1] Indeed, where Karl Marx
and every communist on earth want to create a class struggle in order to control the means
of production, feminists just replace class with
gender.[2] Where communists attempted
global conquest, now, the feminists create a silent "constant state of war"
implemented silently against every home and family via feminism.[3] I find it very odd that other
[of] their party intellectuals have also made this same connection:
Everything feminists advocate was advocated by the Communist Party of the United States
in the 1940's and 1950's. Betty Friedan, author of The Feminine Mystique (1963) and
founder of modern feminism, hid the fact that she had been a Communist activist for 20
years. (See feminist historian Kate Weigand's, Red Feminism: American Communism and the
Making of Women's Liberation, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2001). Feminism simply
transfers Marxist class analysis to gender. The aim is the same: the
"patriarchy" (white men, capitalism) is the source of all evil and must be
destroyed ("transformed"). Women (the proletariat) and anyone else deemed
"oppressed" (gays, people of color) must be handed position and power on a
silver platter.[4]
"Feminism is the intellectual organization of gender hatred, just as Marxism was
the intellectual organization of class hatred. Feminism's business is fashioning weapons
to be used against men in society, education, politics, law and divorce court. The
feminist aim is to overthrow "patriarchal tyranny." In this undertaking, the
male's civil rights count for no more than those of the bourgeoisie in Soviet Russia or
the Jews in National Socialist Germany."[5]
________________
[1] [S]econd-wave feminism stands as an excellent
example of a 1960s movement that blossomed from the seeds that Communist women germinated
thirty years earlier.
American Communism and the Making of Women's Liberation,
by Henry Makow, PhD., October 3, 2001; http://www.savethemales.ca/031001.html
[2] Sexuality is to feminism what work is to
Marxism. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, by Catharine A. MacKinnon, 1989,
First Harvard University Press, p. 3.
[3] They will subvert all foreign nations using this
same gender warfare as well. I believe this is what is presently occurring
foundationally in the Middle East.
[4] http://www.savethemales.ca/uw/main.html
[5]
What civil rights has wrought. Paul
Craig Roberts, July 26, 2000. Townhall.com - Creators Syndicate.
Feminism, Socialism and Communism are the exact opposites from each other. Like
matter and anti-matter – they are totally disparate and cannot occupy the same
area.
- COMMUNISM. "A system of social organization in which goods are held in
common, the opposite of the system of private property; communalism, any
theory or system of social organization involving common ownership of agents of production
of industry, the latter of which theories is referred to in the popular use of the word
"communism" while the scientific usage sometimes conforms to the first alone and
sometimes alternates between the first and second; also the principles and theories of the
Communist Party, especially in Soviet Russia." Feinglass v. Reinecke,
D.C.Ill., 48 F.Supp. 438, 440.
Dr. Milton Freedman, a Nobel-prize-winning laureate, noted in his work (quoted in my
first book), that "There are only certain sociological-political
systems which can be combined....People thinking that we can have a Socialist-Democracy,
are deluding themselves." [paraphrased].
Please note the delusion as quoted by Herbert Hoover: "The Socialists claim
they would preserve democratic institutions and all other freedoms except economic
freedom." (The Challenge to Liberty, by Herbert Hoover, Charles
Scribner's Sons, N.Y., 1934, pg. 59) They are lying. If we read "The
Law" by Frederick Bastiat, he clearly denotes that the socialists will use altruism
"to gain inroads into the rights of all property" and transfer them to
government. The socialist will allow NO freedom-and will always devolve to the
limits of their perversity (Fascism)...which is what this nation is experienc[ing] now.
[Don't believe me? Try and take a legal product, and smoke it in a
restaurant. And they are not stopping there. They are far from over from
"saving us."] Any Feminist government is a socialist government which
devolves to Communism, then institutes fascism to support it.
However; under the system of CAPITALISM, you NEED the family. Capitalism uses
peoples individual needs in which to have them accrue wealth. To have Capitalism,
you need families. You need a free society. You NEED sexual regulation.
Where CAPITALISM needs all members of the family to voluntarily submit to Patriarchy
(sexual regulation) the feminists/communists NEED to destroy the family:
"The nuclear family must be destroyed, and people must find better ways of living
together. ... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an
objectively revolutionary process. ... "Families have supported oppression by
separating people into small, isolated units, unable to join together to fight for common
interests." (Functions of the Family, by Linda Gordon,
WOMEN: A
Journal of Liberation, Fall, 1969.)
Capitalism is probably best represented by the implementing of Protestant Calvinist
thought in the United States. That a man will live a upright and moral life,
that he will have leadership responsibilities, and that he will absorb himself in his
work, and from that – he will amass a great amount of wealth, and from that wealth,
he will not only ascend his family's condition, but his community as well. This
infrastructure has built the freest and most highly competitive and wealthy nation(s)
which has ever existed. The key is the accrual of wealth IN THE MASSES, (where the
common man became the bourgeoisie). To institute this free government, YOU NEED
FAMILIES. As families are the social cells which institute both Capitalism and
freedom. This is done under the structure of Patriarchy.
It is not like you can remove these things. [Please go to my free e-Book, in the last
Chapter (21) and look for the KRELL WELFARE MACHINE charts (two of them) – you will
see that the Matriarchal Society (Feminist/Socialist/Communist) is directly the opposite
of the Patriarchal State (Capitalist, Free American) The components of one can
only go with the other. In other words, you cannot have a free independent media
which informs the public – and then have a Matriarchal / Feminist society. In
Hillary Clinton's Village, the Media can ONLY be a propaganda arm of the government. (It
cannot allow "information" to be given to the people.) This is why when
she runs for office, she has her personally selected members who travel along with her in
three separate buses, to "act" like a random community when shown on TV, but who
are in fact propaganda shills, there to only ask her "intelligent" questions she
already knows the answers to. (However, get her in front of a real crowd – like
the Post 9-11 debacle where she made an impromptu appearance in front of the Police and
Firemen of New York City – and you will see her get booed off the stage in a
deafening cacophony of disapproval.) You cannot have marriage, and have women's
rights. You cannot have savings, and have a government with a huge 7 Trillion
dollar debt. You cannot have an intelligent society under Socialism, ergo, you need
a dolt school system which is dead-last in world TMSS scores...under Patriarchy, you have
highly efficient schools and an educated public as Thomas Jefferson mandated, and which
this nation implemented for almost 200 continuous years (until the advent of modern
feminism within our schools).
Capitalism is NOT a perfect system. Patriarchy is not a perfect social system.
HOWEVER, TO DATE, IT IS THE GREATEST SOCIAL VEHICLE TO ALLOW THE INDIVIDUAL TO
SUPERCEDE OVER THE MOB. IT IS THE MOST SUCCESSFUL [of the] SYSTEMS THAT HAVE FREEDOM
INGRAINED WITHIN THEM AS A BASIC DESIGN. IT IS SELF-REGULATING FOR THE GREATEST
PART; AND IT IMBUES THINGS SUCH AS CHIVALRY AND CALVINISM, WHICH DOES GREAT THINGS FOR ANY
NATION. These systems demand free-sovereign families. Whereas,
feminism/socialism/communism has to destroy families in order to "seize control of
production" (wealth).
The templates of freedom are ingrained within Capitalism and Patriarchy. The
archetypes of oppression are contained within feminism/socialism/communism. In
fact, they lead to huge oppressive "statist" governments whom brutally control
their populaces "from cradle to grave." Where freedom is constrained and
overthrown. Where huge prison systems and government infrastructures are instituted,
groomed and maintained...
You cannot have huge prison populations – and have a free government.
Clearly, feminism is worse than Capitalism. It's time that people understand the
importance of fatherhood. Fatherhood is a basic template of freedom. It
is very much the component of Capitalism and Patriarchy. And Fatherhood is the enemy
of feminism – there is no dispute of this fact.
It is clear where fatherhood's interests must lie. We must support Capitalism and
Patriarchy UNCONDITIONALLY and excoriate and expunge anything in opposition to these
necessities of all free societies.
Hope this helps.
Aaron
There were responses to those comments. One of them raised
objections to the claim that "feminism is communism" and stated that such a
thing is clearly not possible, that feminism is for and about women. It is a must to
read that and Aaron Burr's refutation of that
objection and others in that response. —WHS
___________________
My Notes:
In
WHY
MEN ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, Warren Farrell explains that men and women
are equally powerless but that men and boys are being indoctrinated to
admire women and to follow career paths that enable men to give women what
women want. For example:
What Are Boys Good For?
What does a teenage girl learn to give to a
boy? Let's look at a thirteen-page spread in Teen-the Christmas 1984
issue. Approximately seventy presents are mentioned, with an average price
of about thirty dollars (over two thousand dollars' [close to US$5,000 in
2007 dollars — F4L] worth of presents). Only one is for a male-pajamas
for a baby boy. As with Ms., no presents for boyfriends.
There are several teenage boys shown in the
pictures. One admires a girl while she admires herself in the mirror;
another is towing a girl's brand-new car. The same use of men as in
Self.
Is the girl in the Teen spread helping
the boy who has attached her car to a tow truck? No. She drapes herself over
the tow truck. And how does she learn to handle a stressful situation? The
caption explains: "If a stressful situation causes complexion concerns, keep
skin under control with Noxzema Acne 12. And pass the time in an
easy-to-wear wardrobe!"
All twelve days of Christmas run the same
pattern: "Keep tabs on your weight," "File your nails ... ," "Massage your
hands," "Massage your feet," "Turn heads in your direction by keeping lips
lusciously lubricated .... " What does he get? Nothing is mentioned but her
beauty. What lessons does he learn? Admire and rescue. [Emphasis
by F4L] In Teen. In Ms.
In Self.
Do teenage boys' magazines show a girl towing
his brand-new car, while he drapes himself over her tow truck and
worries about his acne? Hardly.
In men's magazines there are only a few gifts
for men to buy women. Remember the principle of the De Beers transfer. She
chooses the diamond and chooses among the men her beauty power can attract
to buy it. Which is why his ads are for how to become successful enough to
buy whatever she chooses; hers are to become beautiful enough to be able to
make the choice of both the gift and the man to buy the gift. Men's
magazines do not feature many gifts for women because men are expected to do
the buying after consulting the women, not the magazine, and to concentrate
their energies on making the money.
WHY MEN
ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, By Warren Farrell, p 34-35
Once they become men (or perhaps even sooner), men
(or boys) begin to catch on. For example:
Why is changing a light bulb always a guy's job? Because women have more
important things to do - like making men feel useful and important by giving
them things to do, like changing light bulbs.
How many divorced men does it take to change a light bulb? None. They never
get the house anyway.
— Edmonton Journal,
2007 08 28, p. B2, Venting
(more at
edmontonjournal.com Online Extras - Venting)
It will take quite some time yet, however, before a majority of
society gets Warren Farrell's message expressed in the following.
One of the fascinating
parts about men is our tendency to subject ourselves to war, physical abuse,
and psychological abuse and call it "power." The ability to be totally out
of control while continuing to view ourselves as the ones with the power can
have certain advantages to a woman. As expressed in this poem:
One-Night Stand
He bought me
drinks all evening
in response to just a wink
Then accepted my invitation to
repair my kitchen sink
Then I brought him into beddy-bye
to get a little sex
Then couldn't help but smile
when he called it conquest!
WHY MEN
ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, By Warren Farrell, p.
289
That story, translated into a joke that is far more ironic than
it is funny, goes like this:
An Irishman an Englishman and a Scotsman were sitting in a
bar in Sydney. The view was fantastic, the beer excellent, and the food
exceptional. "But" said the Scotsman, "I still prefer the pubs back home. Why,
in Glasgow there's a little bar called McTavish's. Now the landlord there
goes out of his way for the locals so much that when you buy 4 drinks he
will buy the 5th drink for you."
"Well," said the Englishman "at my local, the Red Lion, the barman there will
buy you your 3rd drink after you buy the first 2."
"Ahhh that's nothin'," said the Irishman, "Back home in Dublin there's Ryan's
Bar. Now the moment you set foot in the place they'll buy you a drink, then
another, all the drinks you like. Then when you've had enough drink they'll
take you upstairs and see that you get laid. All on the house."
The Englishman and Scotsman immediately pour scorn on the Irishman's claims.
He swears every word is true.
"Well," said the Englishman, "Did this actually happen to you?"
"Not myself personally, no" said the Irishman, "but it did happen to my
sister."
found at angryharry.com
Men's problem is that
women's "powerlessness" has been amply addressed throughout the history of
evolution, intensively so since the advent of radical feminism
[*], but that men's
powerlessness received little or no attention. Instead, men curry women's favors
by giving women gifts, even the gift of men's lives.
While in the past men were enticed to live up to the social duties
imposed upon them with promises that they would be paid back for that through
society paying them appreciation, honour and respect, today
— thanks to decades of feminist slandering of men, intended to "increase"
the social value of women — men are being vilified for being men, and not much else matters.
* If the term "radical feminism" (a.k.a.
Marxist- or socialist-feminism) is somewhat new to you, you need to expand
your knowledge. After all, radical feminism, the currently controlling
faction of feminism, governs just about everything that is happening in your
life. See,
Carey Roberts column
Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on
political correctness.
His best-known work is an exposé on Marxism and the roots of
radical feminism.
Carey Roberts' best-known work, his exposé on Marxism and the
Roots of Radical Feminism, is not necessarily easy to find, but
this link will help with that. (Some of the URLs for the article
series appear to keep changing. For that reason the identified link
leads to an Internet search for the series. The first or second link in
the return list will most likely lead you to the series.)
See also:
 The White Rose
Thoughts are Free __________________
Posted 2003 04 25
Updates:
2003 04 29 (added reference and link to diagrams of the patriarchal
versus the feminist family model)
2006 03 04 (added link to Feminism for Male College
Students)
2007 07 29 (added entry for WHY MEN ARE THE
WAY THEY ARE)
2007 12 14 (reformated) |
|
Share
