| | Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us| | |
The book put to an end a two-year hiatus in Karin Jaeckel's career as an
author, the result of a boycott in the publishing industry against her a hostile
reaction and retaliation against her on account of her last-published book The
Secondhand Man, in which she merely illustrated society's attitudes toward men,
especially toward fathers, and in which she illustrates the impact of fatherlessness on children. (Translated
excerpts from The Secondhand Man)
At 15:34 1999 10 08 +0000, webmaster@pappa.com wrote: Translation of that quote: Karin Jaeckel succeeded in producing a broad, comprehensive view of
the cooperative life of husband, wife and family.
Karin Jaeckel's new book The wife at his side appeared on the market and received its first review. It is a book that relates the experiences of wives throughout history who stood by their husbands' sides through thick and thin, through suffering and success -- wives that any real man would be proud to be married to -- and compares them to modern trends in marriage and careers of women. In forwarding the review, Karin Jaeckel expressed regret that the reviewer had not managed to read all of her book. The review is a two-page article (no advertising inserts), in the German periodical FOCUS. The following is a translation of the article in FOCUS that provides the review of The wife at his side. |
FOCUS, (40/1999)
MODERN LIVINGElation and Frustration
Kitchenwork can cause stress. Nevertheless, the role of a housewife is astoundingly popular amongst younger women.
[A graph was contained here in the article. It showed that the numbers of people in the work force in all of Germany (in the former East- and West Germany) evolved as shown in the following table
Numbers of employed men and women (millions)
1978 1998 Men 16.3 16.9 Women 9.9 12.4 The title of the graph is "Statistic Employment"
The caption is "Into the office instead of to the stove" The subheading of the caption reads "Since 1978 almost four per cent more employed men, but 25 per cent more women." WHS]
Enough!
Determined housewives fight against being slandered.
Society
Counter Move
[The original text is a colloquial pun and loses its meaning in the translation]
The Manifesto of the German Housewives's Movement puts Career Women and radical Liberationists alike through the Wringer
When the trend researcher Peter Wipper-Amann saw a few months ago the results of his new women's survey, he was left speechless: 60 percent of the younger women (between 14 and 40) wanted to be housewives, rather then to move through life as a "modern amazone" or a "smart slut." (FOCUS 25/99)
Other recent opinion polls too showed that no less than about half of West-German women yearn for the ostensibly dated ideal of the homely all-round provider. It's hard to believe, considering that according to the opinions promoted by the media, the housewife thoroughly disappeared.
Women's periodicals tirelessly produce portraits of heroic women who pursue professional careers, and, in TV crime shows, as cool female police officers hunt down every sinister perpetrator (and thereby at the same time the patriarchy).
The media believes that *a woman needs three things,* a fantastic job, a tolerant man, and at the same time -- for additional strengthening of her self-esteem -- a hot lover (and, if it can be arranged at all, a child or two could be added to that as well).
That grates on the nerves of Karin Jaeckel from the Black Forest, an author of Children's and non-fiction books. At any rate, the mother of three finds it to be quite agreeable when other women are ready to be "the wife at his side' (book title) -- meaning, to be at the side of a nice, sole-income-earning husband.
Protection of her flanks is provided in the form of safe conducts offered, through comrades-in-arms from the German Housewives' Union and the World Organization of Mothers of all Nations, W.O.M.A.N..
Karin Jaeckel's first objective is to pillory the revilement by feminists of "family-women." Examples: The former Hessian women's minister Heide Pfarr accused housewives of wanting to keep a load off the backs of their husbands, so that the latter would be unfairly enabled to resist the competition by battallions of career women, The housewife ideal, so Pfarr according to a quote by Jaeckel, "[I] won't support, but will fight it wherever I encounter it." Sociologist Gunhild Gutschmitt even considers housewives and their husbands -- figuratively -- to be parasites of the social system, because caregivers don't have to make contributions to social insurance and pension schemes."Marriages break increasingly more often under the pressure exerted by the devourer of time and tolerance, SELF-REALIZATION."
Karin Jaeckel
Many bitter words are thus loosened by Karin Jaeckel about the mobbing of mopping women. Nevertheless, can it truly be that enjoyment is to be found in cooking, in raising children and in caring for husbands? Don't look for any insights from her into the world of life and emotions of today's housewives. She justifies the existence as caregiver solely on the basis of the advantages it provides for the emotional well-being of children.
She has ready a single role-model, although not exactly a fresh, dew-sprinkled one: Katharina von Bora, wife of the Church-rebel Martin Luther, is said to have been a self-determined woman, nevertheless a reliable companion, a circumspect administrator, and a good mother.
As long as the author merely demands the right of the housewife not to be discriminated against, one has to agree with her completely. In addition, Karin Jaeckel is on the right track when she complains that relations between the sexes are being disturbed through feminists' half- and quarter truths, such as the allegation that men massively abuse children and beat up women, or that they are bad fathers whose assistance in raising children can be foregone easily. It's all right when she lets go against pedagogical experiments in whom little boys are weaned of their agressivenes but little girls acquire it.The anti-feminist poison-sprayer is unfortunately being used a little too intensively. While feminists love to adhere to a conspiracy theory, according to which an ominous "patriarchy" keeps women away from the arm chairs of power by any and all means, Karin Jaeckel -- on the same level -- imputes that "hard-line feminists" promote a secret program for "the destruction of the family structure" and "the elimination of men." Female striving for domination is supposed to be the cause of marital dischord, youth criminality, and emotional disturbances in children, she suggests, and thereby she makes things far too easy for herself.
It's not worth her while to mention the circumstance that for women too, in the face of a divorce rate of 40 percent in the mean-time, it is fairly risky to interrupt a career. Or that mothers simply go to work because their husbands don't earn enough.
When Karin Jaeckel eventually claims that feminism "estranged" women, through "brain-washing," from their original role of living as housewives, then she erects a dogma that is as foolish as that of her opponents. She counters the feminist postulation of the carreer-enabled mother -- indirectly -- with the norm that a mother with children must be, naturally, a housewife.
The author doesn't strictly adhere to her own advice. She's been writing books for many years -- mostly several each year.--Frank Gerbert
Karin Jaeckel's book is being published by Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Munich (317 pages, DM 19.50) [No ISBN was provided --WHS]
Well, as Karin Jaeckel mentioned, it's too bad that the reviewer, Frank Gerbert, didn't read the whole book. Nevertheless, although Frank Gerbert seems to be generally uneducated or at best somewhat indoctrinated with respect to sex and family issues, one of the aspects he overlooked is that Karin Jaeckel writes her books in the confines of her home. A little bit of history won't hurt either. In the 1820's, family values experienced a revival that eventually brought about a decline in the social destruction and corruption that peaked in the middle of 19th century, it became a social revolution that culminated in what came to be known as the Victorian Age. That revival was brought about largely by women who were housewives free having to labour under the constraints of professional careers, while their husbands worked 60 to 70 hours each week to give them that freedom and freeing them as well from the drudgery of having to do housework. Most of these women, some of which later became the early feminist pioneers, were also largely free of the obligations of having to raise their children themselves, having to scrub floors, or having to cook for their husbands. They were freed from those obligations by the circumstance that their husbands' wealth provided them with abundant domestic help, with everything from kitchen maids, through drivers of their carriages, to gardeners and governesses, because virtually without exception, these women came from the upper-middle class of society in which women lived in such luxury. Although Betty Friedan complained much about the discrimination against American women
in the form of enforced idleness and, like Mao, said that their productivity in the
economy was under-used, she also complained a bit about women having it hard (See 1966 N.O.W. Agenda). Her complaints,
expressed at the founding of N.O.W., was mainly along the lines that women were bored
and not involved to their full potential in the economy. However, as to her own
experiences, nothing much had changed in her life from that of the privileged women of the
Victorian Age. One has to admire a woman like Karin Jaeckel, who can be as active as she is, in spite of being a full-time mother and wife (perhaps, more likely, because of it), apparently well-loved by her family too. That is something that few feminists will ever experience. So, how much of the feminists' wrath is caused by envy due to their inability to love and be loved? Additional recommended reading:"If Men Have All the Power How Come Women Make the Rules," a new book by Jack
Kammer, author of "Good Will Toward Men." Censorship is always far more convenient than having to face the truth, except for the target of the censorship, persecution and vilification.
|
__________________
Posted 1999 10 12
Updates:
2001 01 26 (format changes)
2001 02 11 (format changes)
2002 11 08 (added link to transcript of speech by Dan Lynch
honouring Erin Pizzey)
|