logo for the website of Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | RSS button | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search

2013 04 15: Symantec (makers and distributors of Norton Antivirus) and O2 now filter/block the website of Fathers for Life and *BOTH* of its affiliated blogs. Click for details.


 
 Site Map (very large file)
 Table of Contents
 Activism
 Children—Our most valued assets?
 Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
 Child Support
 Civil Rights & Social Issues
 Families
 Family Law
 Destruction of Families
 Fatherhood
 Fatherlessness
 Divorce Issues
 Domestic Violence
 Feminism
 Gay Issues
 Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
 Health
 Help Lines for Men
 History
 Humour
 Law, Justice and The Judiciary
 Mail to F4L
 Men's Issues
 Suicide
 The Politics of "Sex"
 Our Most Popular Pages
 Email List
 Links
 References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Be notified of
page updates
it's private
powered by
ChangeDetection

BADGE
 of
RECOGNITION

censored-stamp

Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blog are being slandered and censored. (Click for Details)

If you are a fathers-rights or pro-family activist, then it is quite likely that your website or blog is being, slandered and censored, too. (Click to check that out)

 
 
 
 

 

Cover of "The Head of the Medusa," by Perseus Jones

The Head of the Medusa (2000), by Perseus, is a short book about the transformation of the status of men to the status of women.
   The book is important for the cause of the family and all of humanity, but it is politically incorrect. No publisher could be found for it.
   The illustrated version of the book can be read at this website.

 

Now and Then — A comparison of methods used in the persecution of minorities

Parallels between the methods used in the Nazi's extermination of millions of Jews and those used in the whole-sale destruction of our families in the 21st century

By Walter H. SCHNEIDER, who was born and raised in Nazi Germany

Nazi "Star of David" used to mark Jews
From the 
Holocaust Museum

From that to this?

Cloth patch for marking men
Will there be a 
Patricaust Museum?

An average of 500,000 Jews lost their lives per each year of the Nazi regime.
Worldwide, the annual number of male victims of fatal discrimination is in the order of 4.4 million or higher.
It'll never happen!  Jews had to wear the Star of David because otherwise there would have been no obvious characteristics that distinguished them from all other people.  The Nazis wanted to make people believe that the Jews were subhuman, therefore they labeled the Jews — they marked them for discrimination and extermination.
   For men it is a different story.  Men are so obviously different from the "superior" class of humanity that they need not to be marked.  Anybody knows what men are, what they do and what they look like.  However, if it should come to the point that men, too, have to wear a cloth patch to mark them, it could well be designed to look like the one shown above.  For now, just to know that men are men is sufficient.

The total of all men and boys in the world alive in the year 2000 falls short by 278 million. 

based on CIA Worldbook population figures

Who cares how men feel or what they do or whether they suffer?  They have had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete hash of it.  Now it is our turn.  My only comment to men is, if you don't like it, bad luck - and if you get in my way I'll run you down.

— Letter to the editor, signed: Liberated Women, Boronia
Herald-Sun, Melbourne, Australia - 9 February 1996

Not even men care much.  Take for example somebody who copied this web page to a discussion forum and gave a definite maybe, maybe not, but if all else fails, chuckle, in support of what is being said on this page.

NOTE:  This post does not not necessarily represent the opinions of Robert Brown. My posting does not mean that I endorse or agree with the opinion expressed therein.
     I pass along this post because it seems to me thought-provoking, challenging, interesting, or sometimes merely entertaining.
     My intention is that this post may spark conversation and/or debate or make you chuckle.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aum/message/10157

That prime example of fence-sitting is no worse than Nero fiddling while Rome burns.  However, that is about the extent to which most men are concerned about their demotion to second-class citizen and their demise to the rank of being sub-human.  Men are worth less than household pets but nevertheless valuable as pricks with wallets who may also be put to good use as beasts of burden — provided the job we let a given man do is sufficiently dangerous, dirty and onerous that we don't want to burden women with it.  19 out of every 20 job fatalities or victims of serious injuries on the job are men.

(See also: The 1989 Montreal Massacre in the context of men's sacrifices, 2008 12 07, by Professor Jeffrey Asher.)

 

WELCOME TO THE PATRICAUST EXPERIENCE

By Perseus Jones

As we begin the 21st century there seems to be an all-pervading obsession with one horrific aspect of the previous one.  Museums are springing up around the Western world, web sites abound on the Internet, there are thousands of articles in newspapers and magazines, there are movies, TV and radio programs, even educational packs and CD-Roms for our schools.  As we embrace the 21st Century there is one thing about the 20th century that we must never be allowed to forget.  The Holocaust – and rightly so – for if we should forget it, it may happen again.

Millions of words have been written analyzing this almost unfathomable event in human history.

How could a modern, civilized nation actually elect a group of people into power and allow them to manipulate people’s minds to such an extent that millions came to be regarded as unfit for living, that they were less than human, that they were to be systematically stripped of their wealth, their positions, their homes and their liberty, though they had committed no crime other than being born as who they were?

How could intelligent people - academics, scientists, philosophers, doctors, artists and journalists with the aid of generous amounts of tax-payers money, construct pseudo-scientific theories to show that one section of the human race was genetically unfit for life and then proceed to prove it be so by mounting exhibitions, making movies, broadcasts and publishing books and leaflets to convince the population? How could a modern civilization denigrate these unfortunate people psychologically to such an extent that the will to resist was all but destroyed in them?

How could the infrastructure of a whole nation be mobilized – the courts, the police, the armed forces, the bureaucracies – to then persecute those people by eroding their rights, discriminating against them, seizing their assets and homes, rounding them up, imprisoning them in barbed wire compounds and working them to death in factories, mines, quarries, road and building projects?

How was it that the minds of ordinary people were perverted to such an extent that they ignored the arrests and the trains of cattle cars?  How could so many ordinary men and women condone and even participate in the extermination of millions of their fellow human beings? Surely, it could never happen again, could it? To even suggest such a thing is unthinkable, isn’t it?

Death of the Patriarchy – a collage based on Rembrandt's  The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Tulp, by feminist 'artist' Mary Beth Edelson
Death of the Patriarchy – a collage based on Rembrandt's 
The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Tulp, by feminist 'artist' Mary Beth Edelson
(Edelson also produced a collage showing the faces of feminists in 
Michael Angelo's Last Supper)

 

Let us imagine for a moment that here in the 21st century, intelligent people - academics, scientists, philosophers, doctors, artists and journalists with the aid of generous amounts of tax-payers money have constructed pseudo-scientific theories to show that one section of the human race is genetically unfit for life.  Let us imagine that they have ‘proved’ it by mounting exhibitions, making movies, TV and radio documentaries, by promoting falsified statistics and biased studies and by publishing books and leaflets to convince the population that their warped theories are the truth.

Let us imagine that our modern, civilized society has actually allowed a group of people into power; who have manipulated our minds to such an extent that millions of their fellow human beings are now regarded as unfit for living, that they are less than human, that they are to be stripped of their wealth, their positions, their homes and their liberty, though they have committed no crime other than being born as who they are.

Let us further imagine that the infrastructure of the whole of Western society has been mobilized through a powerful and compliant media, that the courts, the police, the armed forces, and the bureaucracies have been persuaded to persecute those people by perverting the law, eroding their rights, discriminating against them, seizing their children, their assets and their homes, rounding them up, imprisoning them behind barbed wire and using them as slave labour.

How could we imagine that the minds of ordinary people today could be perverted enough to ignore the arrests, the suicides and the injustices going on every day all around them? 

How could seemingly intelligent people in this, the 21st Century, be allowed to publish books and to freely promote them, advocating the reduction in the numbers of the unfit for living by billions?  How could a modern civilization denigrate these people psychologically to such an extent that the will to resist is all but destroyed in them – so that they are choosing to take their own lives in vast numbers? 

How could our universities and colleges run classes and courses that support and promote such an evil and inhuman ideology?  How could so many ordinary men and women condone and even participate in the extermination of millions of their fellow human beings?  How could millions of young people grow up believing that one half of the human species is naturally oppressive and essentially evil, whilst the other is naturally supremacist and essentially benign? 

Surely, it could never happen again, could it?  To even suggest such a thing is unthinkable, isn’t it?

Perhaps we have been persuaded to look back so intensely that we have failed to see what is before us now.  Welcome to the 21st Century – the age of the Patricaust.

Perseus Jones is the author of The Head of the Medusa.

 

Discrimination against boys and men is rampant.  Men are being disenfranchised because they are abusers of women and children and, if they are fathers, likely to be deadbeats.  That gives the letters DAD a totally new meaning.  What could fit better than that?  Men should be made to wear a cloth patch like the one shown above.  Why not? 

Even though there are a few women social researchers and men journalists (such as Christina Hoff Sommers, in The War against Boys) who try to bring the truth out in the open that the vilification of boys and men is based on nothing but unsubstantiated propaganda and even on falsified and distorted statistics, their number is extremely small.  That is largely due to the circumstance that virtually all of academe's curriculum has become "politically correct" Marxist, and that the majority of the main-stream media is openly biased in favour of the Marxist ideology and promoting liberal politics.

The ideological control along Marxist party lines in academe has become very pronounced on account of a long program of Maoist purges and ideological re-alignments promoted by organizations such as the Association of American University Women.  It is suicidal for any academicians still endowed with a reasonable amount of common sense and objectivity to give their concerns voice.  Such a course of action invariably results in the destruction of their careers and even reputation, often culminating in criminal prosecution in Star-chamber courts that are controlled and dominated by openly declared Marxist members of their faculties.

Conservative journalists hardly fare any better in their professional fields.  The ideological control of media, publishing and academe is as complete and absolute as it was in the darkest days of any of the totalitarian regimes in history.

With exceptions that can be counted on one hand, men in all countries of the world already live fewer years than women do.  In the developed countries of the world, where femicommunism has made the greatest advances, there is a great disparity between the life expectancies of men and women.  It ranges from 12-14 years in Russia, Ukraine, Latvia and Lithuania, to seven to six years, respectively, in Canada and the USA.  Why NOT make men wear patches, too?

Marking men as the new scapegoats

Men should not make a big play for getting sympathy — few in today’s society will give them any to begin with.  At any rate, it's not wise to wear one's attitude on the lapel.  Not even a hardened Nazi would dream of wearing the badge of the NSDAP on his lapel in Israel. 
   However, today's men are not like the Nazis.  They are more like the Jews in 1939, just as powerless as the Jews were then.

When a 1990's feminist brazenly talks about men as mutants of the animal kingdom, it creates a profoundly hostile environment for men. 

Even in Germany some people are proclaiming now that their government succeeded twice within one century to totally oppress an identifiable minority. 
   If we look at the status of men in our society in that light, this is what we now have:

How does any of that differ from the status of the Jews in the Germany of 1939? (The atrocious and systematic assignment to slave labour and the extermination of the Jews and other ethnic minorities came just after that.

The extermination of 12 million subhuman, non-Aryan ethnic people was the consequence of the Nazi's wish to "purify" the Aryan "race" and to install the SS and their wives as the new aristocracy in a Europe ruled by a centrally governed Nazi regime.
   The deadly discrimination against subhuman men and boys is one of the consequences of the radical feminists' (more accurately called redfems) wish for the planned destruction of our families and to install themselves as the ruling elite in a centrally governed, global, socialistic "matriarchy."

The Scourge of God, Polish Jews - from Der Stuermer

Kali-Bobbitt, by Mary Beth Edelson

An anti-Semitic photomontage titled, "God's Scourge: Polish Jews," that was used as the title page for a 1939 propaganda brochure issued by Der St—rmer (The Assault Trooper, a Nazi periodical, for the publication of which Julius Streicher got hauled in front of the Nueremberg War Trial) 
Kali-Bobbitt, an anti-male and anti-Christian piece of "art" by Mary Beth Edelson, in the Guggenheim Museum.  It is used to glorify Lorena Bobbitt's assault on her husband, during which she cut off his penis while he was sleeping.
Perhaps the extermination of boys and men is being done with less brutality, but is it being done now with any less efficiency?  If so, how come the centre of the promotion of femicommunism, the USA, also has the largest number of men incarcerated per capita in the world?  The figure of  2,000,000 prisoners was reached and surpassed in February, 2000.  At least sixteen out of every seventeen of those prisoners in the USA are men.  The corresponding ratio of men to women prisoners in Canada is 100:1.
   The vast majority of those men are not there on account of having been violent.  They are there because they are men, and the vast majority of them grew up fatherless.

They are disfranchised, abusers, deadbeats — DAD.

Marking men as the new scapegoats

If anyone ever wonders how the whole German society could become so vicious and let the rampant oppression of a minority proceed unchecked, then just look at what is happening to men in the Western world today.  The explanation is right there.  Does anyone think that the process in Germany that led up to the extermination of millions of Jews was that much different from what is being inflicted on the men and boys in our present society?
 

The preceding paragraph was used by angryharry.com to set up a link to this page.  After that link, AH provided the following quote.

"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."

Hermann Goering, President of the Reichstag, Nazi Party, and
Luftwaffe Commander in Chief,
from Gilbert, G.M. (1947). Nurenberg Diary, New York: Signet

How does that relate to what is being discussed on this page?  That is simple.  I'll paraphrase the last sentence in the quote: "All you have to do is TELL THEM WOMEN ARE BEING ATTACKED BY MEN, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of concern for women's plight and for exposing women to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."
   It makes little difference whether the resulting war is between nations or between the sexes.
   To explain our current leaders' role in the process of inciting the masses to the war between the sexes (or against the family, if you wish) is a little more difficult.   After all, we are now a much more sophisticated, enlightened people, or aren't we?   Do our leaders lead us or don't they?  Do they even in so-called democratic nations pursue the mandates given to them by the electorate?
   Our current system of government works according to the principles outlined by Ted Byfield, president of United Western Communications, the founder and publisher of Alberta Report, Western Report and B.C. Report (now called The Report Newsmagazine, but it ceased to be published).

The elites of today are not the ostensible leaders of government, church, commerce and industry. They centre themselves instead in three areas of society: the interest groups, the media and the bureaucracy. The interest groups propose, the media endorse, and the bureaucracy enact. The politicians and the leaders of business, cowed by the media, acquiesce.

— Ted Byfield, in the Alberta Report ,
March 9, 1998, page 44
(for a consenting opinion, see A Conspiracy For Fred)

That is a sobering thought, but it appears to be much worse than that. We must not forget that the interest groups in power have so much power because they comprise many of the leaders of church, commerce and industry, comprise and control much of the media, and, for all intents and purposes, comprise, totally dominate and control practically all of the bureaucracy.

Anti-Jewish propaganda played a big role in the beginning and throughout the whole process then.  Anti-male propaganda is now just as pervasive, and perhaps, thanks to the modern technologies and schemes used in advertising, even more so.  We are being saturated by it, to the extent that even men swallow it hook-line-and-sinker.  The role of "Jud Suess" is being taken by items such as "First Wives Club" (a movie in which the audiences cheered as aging men actors were put through the wringer by aging women actors portraying their wives) and government-sponsored advertising campaigns against "Wife Batterers."  Both are as slanderous and at least as effective in instilling hatred and contempt of men today as was the Nazi's propaganda campaign against the Jews.  What such campaigns lead up to is this:

One of my school buddies received a public ridiculing and castigation.  It came about because he was [partly] Jewish.  I did not know he was that, nor would I have cared if I would have known.  He was my friend.  His mother had asked my closest friend Willi and me to come and pick him up on the way to school and to drop him off afterwards, because some older boys were bullying him. 
   The Hitler Youth marched into our class one day with drums, fifes and flags.  The school principal and a few party officials showed up with them.  They singled out my friend who sat towards the back of the class.  He was asked to come to the front and was used as an exhibit to illustrate what an enemy of the Fatherland looked like: curly brown hair, brown beady eyes, budding hooked nose, etc.. 
   Does anyone think that what was done to my friend was that much different from putting Jonathan Prevette* in isolation for giving his friend a peck on the cheek on her request?  My friend was castigated because he was [partly] Jewish.  Jonathan Prevette had to spend time in isolation instead of at the scheduled ice-cream party, because he was male.

Jonathan came out of his ordeal intact, because his mother could put up a fight for his rights.  My school buddy was dead the morning after the public ridiculing.

There was no answer at the door when we went to pick him up to give him protection on the way to school, as his mother had asked us to.  His mother had taken her own and his life overnight.  She had preferred a gas chamber of her own making over that which awaited them.  She had turned on the oven without lighting it.  I found out when the teacher, Fraulein Krappot, who had started it all, sent me to my friend's house to find out why he wasn't at school.  My seven-year-old friend died because he was considered to be an enemy of the state.

Nine-year-old Sean Pelletier (page down to "Oral Questions, SEAN PELLETIER CASE at that URL) in Chilliwack, B.C., Canada, hanged himself because he could not tolerate a life without his beloved father — to whom his mother denied him access.  He is now no better off than my school buddy.  He also was a direct victim of discrimination gone wild.  So are the teen-aged sons (three in total) of my neighbours’ families who committed suicide within the last few years.

The 300 boys and 3,000 men in all of Canada who kill themselves each year are victims of gender discrimination and gender hatred just the same.  Many of them die simply because nobody cares or has any compassion for them.  They die because they have given up hope in a society that is anti-male and appears to offer no promise of a better future for them.  In February, 1997, we heard on the news that within the preceding month five teenagers took their lives in a single town in central Canada.  The announcer kept it gender-neutral.  He said they were teenagers. 
   We supposed then that we would see more details about that epidemic of suicides in a single town when the papers would publish more about it, that we would then know which gender it is that is represented by these teens.  It should not have come as a surprise to anyone if they were all male.  On average, the chances are 5:1 that they would be.  It seemed to me that the fact that the announcer did not mention their gender is a give-away.  The gender is not important when men or boys are involved.  The gender is then hidden, because to mention it might create concern for the male sex (as it turned out later, all were boys).

Will anyone erect a memorial to these victims of the gender wars?  Will anyone grieve with the parents of these victims of the gender wars as people did nationally when the fourteen victims of a deranged man who had declared war on feminists died in Montreal?  Then a single man committed the murders.  In the suicides of our boys and men all of society is guilty, but no-one will be brought to trial over these suicides.  They are just that: suicides. 
   When a life is taken in suicide it does not matter what the causes are and who drove the victim into the depth of hopelessness, especially when the victims are male.  Suicide is just one of the things that males do, along with all the other acts of violence that they perpetrate.  They can’t possibly have any emotions, because men don’t cry! 

There will never be any war trials to bring the perpetrators of the causes of these consequences to trial.  Nobody will ever determine who the real culprits are, let alone bring them to trial.

The family is the source of all class struggle.

Abolition of the family!  Even the most radical get riled up about this shameful intention of the communists. 
   What is the present family based on?  On capitalism, the acquisition of private property.  It exists in all of its meaning only for the bourgeoisie, but it finds its complement in the enforced lack of families  of the proletarians and public prostitution. 
   The family of the bourgeois naturally falls by the way-side with this, its complement [free love,* or in today's terminology, sexual freedom – WHS], and both will vanish when capitalism vanishes.

— Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, The Communist Manifesto

_______________
Note: The abolition of the family is one of four major aspects of socialism.  That is because "abolition" implies in the minds of many people a gradual, somewhat benign cessation of family formation or of the existence of families (e.g.: "non-fault" divorce).  In reality, "abolition" is not quite the correct term and the term "destruction of the family" more accurately describes the circumstances.

No-fault divorce is hardly ever seen as being what its name identifies.  Almost invariably (but wrongly in about half of the cases) the man is seen as the guilty party at fault and as deserving to be sentenced to life-long punishment for having dared to be married.  Moreover, it can hardly be seen as a benign process if people are so afraid of the liabilities incurred on account of being punished for wanting to form a family that they forego that pleasure to the extent that their deliberate resolve not to have a family and not even children causes their nations to die out.  That is the case with all developed nations. (See Demographic Winter)

At this website, the term "abolition of the family" is used infrequently and the term "destruction of the family" is used far more frequently.  You can perform a site-specific search at the website of Fathers to find instances of web pages that refer to or discuss the destruction of the family.

Erin Pizzey identified in her essay The Planned Destruction of the Family that the ideology of the redfems who invaded and usurped the women's shelter movement that she founded clearly had strong communist roots.

'Your problem is not your isolation but your husband.  He oppresses you and he is a capitalist.'...I was given Mao's little red book and SHREW magazine.  I took it home and was horrified at the hatred it spewed against men. ...I witnessed the women working there tearing open letters and pocketing the three pounds ten shillings that desperate women were sending in to join the movement.  I tried to answer as many of the letters as I could. Some of that money went into buying explosives....
...All this rubbish and rhetoric was to culminate in the up-rising of the 'working classes' and the death of Capitalism and the destruction of all men.  Needless to say there were virtually no working class women in this movement.  Most of the revolution was fought around middle class dinner tables in grisly Islington. 
   By now I was very firmly 'the enemy.'  Men, at this point, took the whole movement as a joke, but it was no joke, as many homeless men deprived of their children will tell you.  Savaged by feminist lawyers and therapists, men have routinely been deprived of their homes, their children and their incomes. 
   I knew that I wanted to fulfill my original dream.  Women working with women in co-operation with men.  The idea that we should work with men was anathema to these women.  The Women's Movement was dominated by the Radical Separatist Movement.  They not only hated men but heterosexual women as well.

— Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first modern women's refuge, 
discussing the communist ideology and roots of radical feminism 
in The Planned Destruction of the Family

Don't just take Erin Pizzey's word for it. See also Matriarchy in USSR — off-site.

One of the most important targets of the successful execution of the agenda for the planned destruction of our families is to vilify, attack, destroy and remove what Professor Daniel Amneus calls the weakest link in the family, men as heads of families and in the role of fathers (off-site).

...we must also note a strong upgrading of the role of women as mothers in the Old Testament....This is quite in line with the general stress on the family as the basic unit of society, which we have also noted in Mesopotamian society at the time of state formation. 
   The more important point is the upgrading of the role of men as fathers – which is to say the strengthening of the family's weakest link, the father's role, which depends in turn upon "the strict regulation of women's sexuality" which today's feminists seek to get rid of.

— Daniel Amneus, The Garbage Generation,
Chapter II, The Once and Future Matriarchy 
— The Stone Age, The Ghetto and the Promiscuity Principle

However, these are just two of very few voices who seek to promote the goal for humanity to have a society in which men and women are harmoniously integrated, a society in which both sexes cooperate to create a civilization in which future generations truly benefit from the legacy left to them by their predecessors instead of having to salvage and scavenge what they can in a free-for-all from the ruins and rubble of the field of battle of the sexes.
   Opposing these voices of reason are legions of followers of Marx and Engels who with blind fervour pursue tactics that aim at eradicating any and all progress made in the evolution of civilization.

I have a great deal of difficulty with the idea of the ideal man.  As far as I'm concerned, men are the product of a damaged gene.  They pretend to be normal but what they're doing sitting there with benign smiles on their faces is they're manufacturing sperm.  They do it all the time.  They never stop.

Germain Greer

Number 10: Regularly beat him on the head with your shoe.

— Sharon Stone
On David Letterman, presenting a top-ten list of keeping your man

The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men.

Sharon Stone

Let's hope that the radical gender activists don't make any further gains.  Systematic extinction might happen here too, and they'll just keep a few males around for breeding. 

feminist logic: It's not fascism when we do it!It is now common to hear bright women with a Ph.D. claim that they can do just fine without a man, that men are dispensable.  Feminist author Sally Miller Gearhart took this a step farther.  She advocates the reduction of men to ten percent of the population, that number being necessary to maintain the diversity of the gene pool.  [See Why have any men at all?]

Don't have any ideas about the chosen few having a good time of it.  They will have as much fun as today's prize bulls have.  Artificial insemination is deemed to be much more efficient than the natural course of events.  Men don’t even have to be alive anymore to father children.  Over the past few years demands for the use of the sperm of deceased men for purposes of artificial insemination of women have steadily increased. 
   That is all that some people see in men.  For them men are nothing more than the contributors of sperm, and we know that for some others an additional role of men is to be wallets.  The irony of it all is that people claim that all of this is done "in the best interest of our children" and in the name of "restitution to the victims of injustices inflicted in the past (or elsewhere in the world)", just as it was all done in Germany “in the interest of purifying the Aryan race".
   However, no matter how many fathers will be removed from the lives of their children, children still need their fathers in their lives.  (See Children in Single-mother Households and Impact of Fatherlessness)

Why would anyone think that the Jews could have saved themselves from doom by taking a pro-Jewish stance then?  Nobody thinks now that it would have helped them at that stage of the game.  Why should anyone insist then that men must wear their opinions on their lapels?  Far more so than was the case with the Jews and their acceptance of the anti-Jewish hoaxes, now even most of the men have adopted the feminist hoaxes and actively resist any efforts to be recruited to fight for their own salvation and survival.  What we seem to have here is literally almost half of our population suffering from the learned helplessness syndrome.  Maybe Lenore Walker will now come and offer her advice as an expert witness, as she so eagerly does in the case of women who are accused of murdering their spouses (at $240 per hour plus traveling expenses, as of a few years ago)

In some respects the Nazis of the early 1940's had more compassion for their victims than today's radical  gender activists have for men and their children.  When the Jews were carted off to their disposal, they at least had the privilege of making the trip in the company of all of their loved ones, even though that was only a small consolation to them.  The final solution that was waiting for them was not disclosed to them until it faced them in the final moments of their lives.

"Labour Makes Free" Sign over the entrance of concentration camp Sachsenhausen
Arbeit Macht Frei (Work makes free) gate at KZ Sachsenhausen
Source: Wikipedia

That is not so with today's men.  They go to slaughter fully knowing what awaits them.  Today's men are being separated first from their families.  Then they find themselves doing slave labour, after losing all or at best the major portion of their family’s assets.  The term of that slave labour can last for as long as eighteen years or more.  The slave labour to which they are condemned serves to force them into supporting two separate households.  What little resources are left to them will be used up in fighting for their rights and those of their children.  When (and not if) they fall into arrears with their assigned quotas, they are deprived of their means to make a living or to earn sufficient wages.  The tools used for that are the removal, denial, or confiscation of driver licenses, passports, air traffic controller licenses, pilot licenses, etc..  They are thus unable to provide the support of two households to which they are condemned.  Incarceration is then the inevitable result, and their obligations keep mounting while they are incarcerated.

To boot, they don't even get the right to appeal any of these draconian measures.  Some have the hope that the justice system might be fair to them.  They have the hope that the funding that they can raise may be sufficient to support the fight for their rights.  They may have the audacity or ability to appeal the sentences that are being handed out to them.  They find then that the transfer of wealth extends to those who might provide to them the financial assistance to continue their fight for their rights — a fight that gives them no more than a false glimmer of hope.  In the end they will find themselves poorer to the extent of what they can afford to raise or by more than $300,000, if they should be able to hand over that much to the legal industry.  However, justice virtually always will be denied to them.

In 1939 it was: "Arbeit macht frei." (Labour liberates).  That was a cruel and sadistic joke played on the inmates who had to enter a death camp under the arch bearing those words.  Today it would be no less insulting to children and their fathers if similar arches, proclaiming: "In the best Interest of the Child!", were mounted over the entrances of our court houses.  The majority of today’s men, too, who enter the halls of "Justice" find that the beginning of their end waits for them there.  The results are very much the same, except that the final solution, the extermination of the victims, is left in the victims’ own hands — yet.

Demonstration at Royal Court of Justice, U.K.: "In the best interest of the child"
Members of the U.K. Men Movement demonstrating 
at the Royal Courts of Justice October 2, 2000 — In the best interest of the child?

Already there is little concern that 15,000 more males than females die in Canada each year.  Organizations like Statistics Canada have more concern for the plight of the ten women that die on average every year as the result of plying their trade — prostitution.**
   Statistics Canada manufacture concern for the women who are involved in selling their bodies.  They point out that, on average, prostitutes receive heavier sentences than their johns and they bolster the number of prostitutes murdered by including the number of those whose lives had been taken in domestic violence — an additional two per year — to raise the annual grand total to an even dozen.  The 15,000 annual victims of the gender war, the men, receive no such compassion.  Nobody feels sorry for them.  The cause of the 300 male teen-victims of suicide and the 3,000 men in Canada who take their lives each year goes unnoticed and unexplored.***

Men now must face the need to fight smartly, with stealth and with cunning.  When the Brown Shirts overran Europe, the few men who still actively resisted went underground.  They by themselves could do and did considerable damage but never had any hope of coming close to gaining victory until they had allies and support from them.  Men too need allies.  One of the most effective allies of men could be the media.  But men don’t complain.  The perception that men are suffering does not exist, because men don’t write or speak up.  They suffer in silence, often unwilling even to admit that they are suffering, or perhaps blissfully unaware of it.
   Yet, when the suffering of men is explained, it often happens that the media pick up on it.  The media pay attention to people who raise controversy.  Controversy is the media’s bread and butter.  As long as men remain silent, nobody will seek to obtain justice for them.  It is not so much a question of lack of leadership as it is a problem of men that don’t complain.

The Nazis posted signs that read "Juden Rauss!" (Jews Out!).  How long before we see signs like this one?

Sign: "Fathers forbidden"


* Jonathan Prevette is a boy in South Carolina who as a first grader violated his teacher's interpretation of his school's sexual harassment rules.
** In 1998, "...seven known prostitutes were killed while plying their trade, up from four in 1997. In all likelihood, these numbers could be higher, as police report only those incidents in which they were certain that the victim was killed while engaging in prostitution-related activities." (StatCan, The Daily, Thursday, October 7, 1999)  Statistics Canada actually did a study a couple of years ago that determined that about 12 prostitutes are being killed per year (Two out of those are male prostitutes and two of the prostitutes were killed in domestic violence incidents. I'm sorry, but I can't find the reference to that study.)  See also Augustine Brannigan, 1995, "The Centre for Justice Statistics began to keep records of occupations of murder victims in 1991. It reports that in the three years from 1991 to 1993, 31 prostitutes were murdered in the course of their work."
*** The causes of the rising rates of male suicides in Canada have never seriously been studied, and the last official study of suicides in Canada was published in 1994 (see Canadian Suicides (1994), Mental Health Division, Health Services Directorate, Health Canada), even though the number of suicides is many hundred times greater than that of prostitutes murdered each year.
   In fact, some government officials, despite clear and indisputable evidence that male suicide rates – especially those for teen-aged boys – have shown steady growth for four decades, are in total denial that a problem even exists: "The suicide rate has not grown historically.  Rather, the reduction in other causes of death have now brought it into prominence," said Nancy Staniland, an injury control leader with the Calgary Regional Health Authority.

As of 2000, a total of 277,997,860 male lives in the world had been lost to the total world population then alive, because men and boys experience far greater levels of risk to lives than those that girls and women are exposed to.

Impact of Affirmative Action
on Population in Selected Countries


Notes:

See The Russian Effort to Abolish Marriage, The Atlantic Monthly, July 1926
(See also a more exhaustive history of the evolution and destructive social impact of Soviet divorce laws)

From the website of the The Soviet Story:

The film tells the story of the Soviet regime and how the Soviet Union helped Nazi Germany instigate the Holocaust.

“The Soviet Story” is a story of an Allied power which helped the Nazis to fight Jews and which slaughtered its own people on an industrial scale. Assisted by the West, this power triumphed on May 9th, 1945. Its crimes were made taboo, and the complete story of Europe’s most murderous regime has never been told. Until now…

DVDs of the documentary can be purchased through Amazon.com, but the documentary is also accessible free-of-charge on-line.

See a review of the documentary on the soviet holocaust or democide, the definition of democide being the extermination of a people by its government. It is estimated that during the height of the Stalinist purges, men comprised 98 percent of the 8-million people that were being exterminated in just two years, 1937 and 1938.

See also:

__________________
Posted 1997 02 25
Updates:
1998 10 30
2000 10 07 (to add graphics and various edits)
2000 10 08 (to add links)
2000 10 10 (added introduction by Perseus and added introductory quotes)
2000 10 15 (to add link to information about the 80 percent reduction in the population of men)
2000 10 16 (to add links to information about impact of fatherlessness)
2001 02 01 (format changes)
001 07 26 (added reference to Free Love)
2002 09 04 (added text box for quote from Goering and for related comments)
2002 12 22 (format changes)
2003 08 01 (added reference to From Marxism to Feminism: The planned destruction of the American family)
2003 09 26 (added Robert Brown's commentary that, if nothing else, this page may make you chuckle)
2006 03 04 (added link to Feminism for Male College Students)