logo for the website of Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | RSS button | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search

2013 04 15: Symantec (makers and distributors of Norton Antivirus) and O2 now filter/block the website of Fathers for Life and *BOTH* of its affiliated blogs. Click for details.


 
 Site Map (very large file)
 Table of Contents
 Activism
 Children—Our most valued assets?
 Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
 Child Support
 Civil Rights & Social Issues
 Families
 Family Law
 Destruction of Families
 Fatherhood
 Fatherlessness
 Divorce Issues
 Domestic Violence
 Feminism
 Gay Issues
 Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
 Health
 Help Lines for Men
 History
 Humour
 Law, Justice and The Judiciary
 Mail to F4L
 Men's Issues
 Suicide
 The Politics of "Sex"
 Our Most Popular Pages
 Email List
 Links
 References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Be notified of
page updates
it's private
powered by
ChangeDetection

BADGE
 of
RECOGNITION

censored-stamp

Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blog are being slandered and censored. (Click for Details)

If you are a fathers-rights or pro-family activist, then it is quite likely that your website or blog is being, slandered and censored, too. (Click to check that out)

 
 
 
 

The English Bill of Rights (1689) and the travesty of justice being forced upon us by Ontario Bill 117, a bill that makes men the Jews of the third millennium

Index:


 

We sure came a long way in the abrogation of our fundamental rights and freedoms.

For anyone trying to understand the evolution of constitutional rights, there is a comprehensive library of constitutional documents for many nations. 

One of the links shown there leads to the 

English Bill of Rights (1689) 
(just after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 which established a constitutionally limited monarchy after the abdication and flight from England of James II) 

It is a must for anyone to understand what is in the English Bill of Rights and what led to its creation.

The 1689 Bill of Rights

An Act for declaring the rights and liberties of the subject and settling the succession of the crown. 

WHEREAS THE LORDS SPIRITUAL AND TEMPORAL, AND COMMONS, ASSEMBLED AT WESTMINSTER, LAWFULLY, FULLY, AND FREELY REPRESENTING ALL THE ESTATES OF THE PEOPLE OF THIS REALM, DID UPON THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, IN 1689, PRESENT UNTO THEIR MAJESTIES THEN CALLED AND KNOWN BY THE NAMES AND STYLE OF WILLIAM AND MARY, PRINCE AND PRINCESS OF ORANGE, BEING PRESENT IN THEIR PROPER PERSONS, A CERTAIN DECLARATION IN WRITING, MADE BY THE SAID LORDS AND COMMONS, IN THE WORDS FOLLOWING: 

Whereas the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counselors, judges, and ministers employed by him, did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the protestant religion, and the laws and liberties of this kingdom. 

By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws, and the execution of laws, without consent of parliament. 

By committing and prosecuting divers worthy prelates, for humbly petitioning to be excused concurring to the said assumed power. 

By issuing and causing to be executed a commission under the great seal for erecting a court called, The court of commissioners for ecclesiastical causes. 
     
By levying money for and to the use of the crown, by pretence of prerogative, for other time, and in other manner, than the same was granted by parliament. 
     
By raising and keeping a standing army within this kingdom in time of peace, without consent of parliament, and quartering soldiers contrary to law. 
     
By causing several good subjects, being protestants, to be disarmed, at the same time when papists were both armed and employed, contrary to law. 

By violating the freedom of election of members to serve in parliament. 

By prosecutions in the court of King's bench, for matters and causes cognizable only in parliament; and by divers other arbitrary and illegal courses. 
     
And whereas of late years, partial, corrupt, and unqualified persons have been returned and served on juries in trials and particularly divers jurors in trials for high treason, which were not freeholders. 

And excessive bail hath been required of persons committed in criminal cases, to elude the benefit of the laws made for the liberty of the subject. 

And excessive fines have been imposed; and illegal and cruel punishments inflicted. 

And several grants and promises made of fines and forfeitures, before any conviction or judgment against the persons, upon whom the same were to be levied. 

All of which are utterly and directly contrary to the known laws and statutes, and freedom of this realm.

Time for another revolution?

Those abuses of human rights and freedoms outlined in the preamble to the English Bill of Rights (1689) led to a revolution that deposed of the King of England and resulted in the creation of modern democracy not only in England but, ultimately, in many other nations.  As is explained in the introduction at the Web page showing the English Bill of Rights, the revolution culminated in an end to" the devine right of kings."  It was about time to do it then, and, now that democracy appears to be coming to an end after is brief existence of 300 years, it is time to do it again, by any means that are so far legally permissible.

The meaning of the word legislator is "lawgiver or maker of laws."  In Canada the power to create or change laws has — through the machinations of our Liberal prime ministers — been taken from the people and their representatives and given into the hands of our prime minister's judges.  

Let there be no mistake, those judges are his.  They are appointed by him for life.  They are being appointed through a secretive process that is entirely under the rule and power of our prime minister, exempt from the scrutiny by anyone in Canada.  

That makes our supreme court justices the equivalent of King James II.  They are nine kings in red robes that now rule our country, but they are the vassals of our prime minister, and they'll continue to capriciously shape and twist our laws until nothing remains of the rights and freedoms that we once had and of the moral standards that just a few decades ago still made us proud Canadians. 

A total of close to 2000 federal judges operate in Canada.  They are judges with an agenda, a feminist agenda, an agenda that is family- and father-hostile.

We still have the right to vote, although the parties in power give themselves increasingly more power to make it more and more difficult for any opposition to their rule to make its votes count.  They do it by hook and by crook. There are currently FIVE criminal investigations in the electoral riding of our Liberal prime minister, investigations into abuses, fraud and and wrong-doings by the prime minister and his party.  We don't have to wait for the outcomes of those investigations, we can end the rule of the corrupt Liberal totalitarian regime right now.  Who knows, at the rate things are going, after another Liberal term, it may not be possible anymore to do that by voting.

Creating an Ontario that is much like the England that was dismantled in 1688

The English Bill of Rights included specific provisions to prevent the abuses listed above from occurring.  The abuses present in Ontario Bill 117 will create exactly the types of abuses of the laws of our country that led to the revolution of 1688 in England.  Have no illusions, if Ontario Bill 117 becomes law, given the Liberal's federal regime, it will have repercussions throughout all of Canada, just as happened with other family-hostile legislation that originated in Ontario.

The "inalienable" rights established in the English Bill of Rights that were the blueprint for all constitutions in the free, democratic world will be officially dead when Bill 117 becomes law.  They lived for just about exactly 300 years – a very short time in the history of civilization, but just about all the time given for democracy to exist.

Do we need another revolution to bring democracy back into existence, or is there anything left to negotiate democratically?  There is right now.  Exercise your power to vote while you still can.  It is quite possible that if the Liberals get into power for another term that you'll have to die fighting for your rights.

How much more are you willing to take?

Saturday 4 November 2000

Men 'one phone call' from total destruction'

Accused abusers would lose freedom, property under Bill 117

Dave Brown
The Ottawa Citizen

TORONTO - Ontario's domestic violence war is about to enter its nuclear age with the creation of a legal weapon so destructive no sane man will risk abusive behaviour -- or marriage, or even dating. ...

Full story

 

December 18, 2000

Report Newsmagazine

One phone call away from ruin

Bill 117 means that in Ontario women can trash men's lives with ease

by Eli Schuster

OBSERVERS of Ontario politics remember the 1995 provincial election campaign, when Liberal leader Lyn McLeod's views on domestic violence were interpreted as "shout at your spouse, lose your house." Ms. McLeod insisted she had not intended that her position be interpreted as an attack on men, but when the smoke cleared, her party had blown a 30-point lead in the polls and Conservative leader Mike Harris was premier. Now, say critics of Ontario's proposed Bill 117, the Tory government's Domestic Violence Protection Act, Ms. McLeod may wind up with the last laugh.

Full story

Additional Reading: Now and Then — A Comparison  

__________________
Posted 2000 11 26
Updates:
2001 01 30 (format changes)
2002 06 08 (Created index and showed link to article by Report Newsmagazine)