logo for the website of Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | RSS button | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search

2013 04 15: Symantec (makers and distributors of Norton Antivirus) and O2 now filter/block the website of Fathers for Life and *BOTH* of its affiliated blogs. Click for details.


 
 Site Map (very large file)
 Table of Contents
 Activism
 Children—Our most valued assets?
 Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
 Child Support
 Civil Rights & Social Issues
 Families
 Family Law
 Destruction of Families
 Fatherhood
 Fatherlessness
 Divorce Issues
 Domestic Violence
 Feminism
 Gay Issues
 Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
 Health
 Help Lines for Men
 History
 Humour
 Law, Justice and The Judiciary
 Mail to F4L
 Men's Issues
 Suicide
 The Politics of "Sex"
 Our Most Popular Pages
 Email List
 Links
 References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Be notified of
page updates
it's private
powered by
ChangeDetection

BADGE
 of
RECOGNITION

censored-stamp

Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blog are being slandered and censored. (Click for Details)

If you are a fathers-rights or pro-family activist, then it is quite likely that your website or blog is being, slandered and censored, too. (Click to check that out)

 
 
 
 

From Free Speech to Speech Codes on American Campuses


By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Columnist, 10/19/98

In olden days, ''before the oppression began,'' as Alan Kors and Harvey Silverglate put it, there existed at the University of Pennsylvania an institution called Van Pelt College House.  This was a residence in which diversity flourished - real diversity, not the sour quasi-apartheid common at American universities today.  Van Pelt House brought together instructors and students of every stripe - ''evangelicals and gay activists, Catholic Newman Center members and radical feminists, conservatives and revolutionaries, blacks and whites of all persuasions, including the first few presidents of the militant Black Student League and blacks majoring in finance at the Wharton School.''

What the residents of Van Pelt experienced, Kors and Silverglate write in a blistering new book, ''The Shadow University'' (Free Press), was the authentic ''discovery of difference'' that once made the best colleges incubators of tolerance and broadmindedness.  ''Its members moved each year from distance to conversation, and from mutual suspicions to various degrees of understanding, and, usually, to touchingly kind relationships.  People offended each other all the time, but they learned to talk to each other and to understand each other.''

Try to find a Van Pelt House at Penn, or anywhere else, in the 1990s.  Rarely are students today encouraged to view each other as individuals.  They are pushed instead to divide themselves by race, sex, and ethnicity.  Higher education once offered undergraduates the time and tools they needed to shape their own identities; now undergraduates get their identities handed to them as they arrive on campus.

At Smith College, freshmen in 1990 were provided with handbooks from the Office of Student Affairs.  These began with a definition of ''ethnic identity'' and went on to supply a glossary of ''oppression'': Ableism, Ageism, Antisemitism, Classism, Ethnocentrism, Heterosexism, Lookism, Racism, Religious Discrimination, Sexism.  These terms would prove valuable, the new students were told, ''as groups of people begin the process of realizing that they are oppressed.''

It isn't only at Smith that administrators are engaged so tendentiously in bringing students to political enlightenment.  Incoming Columbia freshmen a few years ago were lectured on ''the archetypes and stereotypes in American society that support racism and prejudice''; they then gathered to hear three students - one gay, one Asian, one black - discuss their encounters with bigotry and discrimination.  Dartmouth's mandatory orientation dealt with what the assistant dean of freshmen termed ''the various forms of `isms': sexism, racism, classism.''  For newcomers at Bowdoin, there was a program snappily called ''Defining Diversity: Your Role in Racial-Consciousness Raising and Cross-Cultural Social Enhancers.''

Kors, a professor of history, is on most issues a conservative; Silverglate, a noted attorney, is a liberal.  What they share is a commitment to freedom, especially freedom of speech and conscience.  The two men, who were undergraduates at Princeton in the 1960s, have watched with alarm the transformation of US campuses from places of robust expression to grim zones of censorship and repression.  When they were students, the Free  Speech movement was germinating.  Today free speech is out, and speech codes are in.

No longer do universities prize the uninhibited clash of ideas and opinions.  On campuses from sea to shining sea, political correctness is the ruling orthodoxy and The Right Not To Be Offended trumps every consideration.  The authors describe case after case of professors and students silenced, punished, or exiled for daring to say things somebody deemed offensive.  Some of the episodes are notorious - a chapter is devoted to the shocking ''water buffalo'' inquisition at the University of Pennsylvania.  Others are little known.  Consider the fate of Don Staples, a professor of film at the University of North Texas:

   ''At a university forum on ways to improve the experience
     of minority students, a black undergraduate complained
     that courses contained inadequate materials by minorities.
     Staples replied that his own course incorporated a large
     number of contributions by black filmmakers, but that
     minority students in his class still had poor attendance.
     For that remark, the university suspended Staples for one
     week.  Chancellor Alfred F. Hurley [explained] that while
     free speech would be protected, `racism will not be
     tolerated.'''

How bad is it?  In 1993, a motion was introduced at a faculty meeting of Hampshire College in Amherst.  It affirmed ''the right of all members of the college community to the free expression of views in speech or in art, and the right of all members of the community to hear the expression of any views'' and condemned ''the censorship or prohibition of non-criminal speech.''  The motion was defeated, 26-21.  THAT bad.

''A nation that does not educate in freedom,'' Kors and Silverglate warn, ''will not survive in freedom, and will not even know when it has lost it.''  All tyrannies eventually crumble; so will the tyranny of thought in American higher education.  But between now and eventually, how many free minds and spirits will be crushed?  ''The Shadow University'' sends up an unignorable flare, but it may be a long time before help arrives.
 

Jeff Jacoby is a Globe columnist.

This story ran on page A23 of the Boston Globe on 10/19/98.
Link
Copyright 1998 Globe Newspaper Company.
 


Additional reading:

  • Alberta Report September 30, 1996 Internet Edition

Deconstructing the arts faculty: Doctrinaire feminism tightens its grasp on the U of A's biggest department.

Update 2010 11 09: Upon request by the author of that article, [authors name removed as per the author's request], the article no longer resides at the website of Fathers for Life. He wrote: "...there are alleged errors in the article and reposting it exposes me and you to legal action."

Although the article was posted at our website with the permission of the Alberta Report, it has been removed because it would not be appropriate to present an article whose author fears that it may contain inaccuracies contains an inaccuracy (a wrongly spelled name) that may expose him to legal action. (The last part of that sentence has been changed after the author complained that the phrase "may contain inaccuracies" was not true to fact.)

  • ZERO TOLERANCE: Hot Button Politics in Canada's Universities, by Peter C. Emberley, Penguin Books, Toronto 313 pages; softcover; $19.99 -- Review by Martin Loney in the Alberta Report, October 7, 1996
  • Poison In Academe -- How forced growth in midcentury produced brainrot:

PETRIFIED CAMPUS: The Crisis in Canadian Universities, By David Bercuson, Robert Bothwell and J.L. Granatstein, Random House, New York, 216 pages; hardcover; $29.95-- Review by Nathan Greenfield in the Alberta Report, January 19, 1998

  • Alberta Report, May 26, 1996, Society

Opposition to multiculturalism is now a firing offence

Free speech is on trial in B.C.

Planned Parenthood moves from birth control to gay propaganda

  • Alberta Report, July 28 1997

Cover: Raising hell -- Satanic rocker Marilyn Manson inspires community revolts in Calgary and Edmonton


See also:

  • Political correctness taints the politics of domestic violence statistics

Neutralizing Hostility between the Sexes : Solving the Problem of Domestic Violence with the Bigger Picture
Transcript of a speech by Chris Erickson honouring Erin Pizzey at Toronto Mensa's Annual Regional Gathering, October 19, 2002

_________
Updates:
2001 01 31 (format changes)
2002 11 08 (added link to speech honouring Erin Pizzey, founder of the women's shelter movement and the target of feminist censorship, persecution and harassment)
Updates:
2006 03 04 (added link to Feminism for Male College Students)