logo for the website of Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | RSS button | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search

2013 04 15: Symantec (makers and distributors of Norton Antivirus) and O2 now filter/block the website of Fathers for Life and *BOTH* of its affiliated blogs. Click for details.


 
 Site Map (very large file)
 Table of Contents
 Activism
 Children—Our most valued assets?
 Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
 Child Support
 Civil Rights & Social Issues
 Families
 Family Law
 Destruction of Families
 Fatherhood
 Fatherlessness
 Divorce Issues
 Domestic Violence
 Feminism
 Gay Issues
 Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
 Health
 Help Lines for Men
 History
 Humour
 Law, Justice and The Judiciary
 Mail to F4L
 Men's Issues
 Suicide
 The Politics of "Sex"
 Our Most Popular Pages
 Email List
 Links
 References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Be notified of
page updates
it's private
powered by
ChangeDetection

BADGE
 of
RECOGNITION

censored-stamp

Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blog are being slandered and censored. (Click for Details)

If you are a fathers-rights or pro-family activist, then it is quite likely that your website or blog is being, slandered and censored, too. (Click to check that out)

 
 
 
 

Rights and Freedoms — Summary


Having read Free to Choose — A Personal Statement, by Milton and Rose Friedman*, it makes me feel a bit embarrassed for not having seen the light much, much sooner, although the suspicion of the recognition of the problem - the first step for a successful problem solution - was always in my mind.

We would all do well if we were to take to heart what Milton and Rose Friedman said in their book.  I got a lot out of reading their book -- which I did when I had time this summer as I was following the pole-testing crew around to monitor the work they did for the Bruderheim Rural Electrification Association.

Since then I often refer back to the book and re-read some of the passages I marked. Many things that I tried to come to terms with over the years were already summarized by the Friedmans many years ago, a quarter century past.

If there is an obvious flaw in the book, it is its assessments of the political trends of the '70s. Those are covered in Chapter 10, "The Tide is Turning", which contains the prediction (now proven to be wrong) that the growing dissatisfaction by people in the developed nations with the damages that growing liberalism had caused would bring an accelerating return to common sense and more conservative values. The proof the authors sought and found for that was a wave of return to more conservative governments in many nations.

That trend was nothing more than a small blip in the continuous and escalating consequences of the propaganda war for more consumerism, more liberalism and more rights and freedoms.

Liberalism and the rights and freedoms it promises are very powerful and deadly lures. The book's aim is to explain that and the damages those lures caused over the years.

What I consider the key argument of the book is in Chapter 4, "Created Equal", which covers equality, liberty, equality before God, equality of opportunity, equality of outcome, the consequences of egalitarian politics, and capitalism and equality.

My summary of that chapter, and that is what I reflected on in my previous comments on rights, is:

Affirmative action is the use of force to achieve equality of outcome.

The use of force to achieve equality destroys freedom.

All of society is without doubt being forced to pay for what feminism wanted to achieve for women, but that is by no means the only area where affirmative action is being put to work.

All along the major aim was and is that women were to be liberated from being enslaved to the patriarchy. The consequences of that are the escalating deconstruction of our families, growing child poverty, poverty and enslavement for men, and, most importantly — because that demonstrates how ludicrous feminism's goal truly is, an enormous increase in the number of women (and "their" children) in poverty.

During the '50s and '60s there were virtually no women at all on skid row. Today they are a substantial and growing presence there (roughly ten percent of the skid row population in North America). Ironically, feminists and their fellow travelers use the rising number of women on skid row or in poverty as further proof that women deserve increasing concern about their victimhood and about society's continuing and even escalating oppression of and discrimination against women.

Let's wake up! The problem of escalating women's poverty was caused by nobody but feminism — and nobody but feminism, as well as politicians and bureaucrats who fell for the bill of goods that feminism sold them, must be blamed for that. In addition, we must not forget that by now feminism controls and comprises the bureaucracy. Therefore the aims of radical feminism and of the bureaucracy are now one and the same. (If the term "radical feminism" (a.k.a. Marxist- or socialist-feminism) is somewhat new to you, you need to expand your knowledge.  After all, radical feminism, the currently controlling faction of feminism, governs just about everything that is happening in your life.  See,

Carey Roberts column

Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on political correctness. His best-known work is an exposé on Marxism and the roots of radical feminism.

Carey Roberts' best-known work, his exposé on Marxism and the roots of radical feminism, is not necessarily easy to find, but this link will help with that. (Some of the URLs for the article series appear to keep changing.  For that reason the identified link leads to an Internet search for the series.  The first or second link in the return list will most likely lead you to the series.))

Nevertheless, although feminism feminist logic: It's not fascism when we do it!caused great harm to women and children, the damages to men and to the status of men are far greater yet.

Men lost not only the prestige they once had and the respect and appreciation that society once had for them. It is predominantly men who are being forced to pay for the damages to society that feminism brought about. Moreover, it is primarily men who pay for all of the tools, ways and means by which feminism systematically brings about the demise of men in our culture and thereby the gradual collapse of western civilization.

None of the aspects of the politics of sex are covered in "Free to Choose". Although the book correctly identifies that there is a price to be paid for any right that is created within society, it fails to identify that primarily men, by far, lost their freedom.  Men have been sentenced to pay not only for the rights that feminism created for women in addition to all of the rights and privileges that women had all along.  Men are now being forced as well to pay for all of the damages that feminism caused for men and for all of society.

Men are the losers in the war against our families. The winners are the people who comprise the increasingly totalitarian bureaucracy and its spin-off industries that quite clearly collude to destroy men and our society.

Milton and Rose Friedman state that a free society "does not prevent some people from arbitrarily suppressing others.  It does not prevent some people from achieving positions of privilege, but so long as freedom is maintained, it prevents those positions of privilege from becoming institutionalized..." (Free to Choose, p. 139)

We failed to prevent positions of privilege from becoming institutionalized.  Therefore we lost much of the freedom we once had and must now worry about how to cope in a society that is ostensibly becoming more and more liberal, but that in reality is becoming increasingly more and more totalitarian as we are being burdened with more and more obligations to pay for the rights of ever new classes of "victims".

Walter H. Schneider

________________
 Milton Friedman won the 1976 Nobel Prize for Economics

Back to Table of Contents for Rights and Freedoms

Don't neglect to read also:

Men's News Daily

Whiplash vs. Trueheart: The Politics of Melodrama

October 30, 2003
by Paul C. Robbins, Ph.D.

The plot was simple: Snidely Whiplash versus Tom Trueheart for the love of Tess. Tess was young and desirable, torn between Whiplash and Trueheart....

Snidely Whiplash wanted to ravage Tess and cared not a whit about her welfare....He wanted to do her in, and then Tom Trueheart came to Tess' rescue and did Snidely Whiplash in.

As Paul Robbins explains, such a story teaches morals, and the moral is that in today's society Joe Average is Snidely, feminists are Tess, and the politicians are Tom Trueheart or successfully pretend to be — not to gain "Tess'" love but to gain her...I better not tell all of it and let you read the rest of the story).

An eye-opening read; give a copy to your friends.  It explains the basic and extremely successful strategy used to ram women's "liberation" down everyone's throat.  All men, their friends and our children are the losers, but women lose, too, the more they gain "victim" status.

There is absolutely nothing new about that sort of recent development.  The trend is nothing but a continuation of the chivalry by "men" of the Victorian age (politicians, judges and lawyers) who did their best to give women — in the name of liberating them from male oppression — more and more privileges at the expense of common men.  In that fashion The Fraud of Feminism (1913, by Belfort Bax) has been at work already for hundreds of years to bring about The Legal Subjection of Men (1908, by Belfort Bax).

_____________
Note: The Internet Archive does not always produce results for those two preceding links. However, the two pieces by Belfort Bax can be found and accessed in other locations on the Net. You can use, for example, http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Fraud_of_Feminism and http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Legal_Subjection_of_Men

In WHY MEN ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, Warren Farrell explains that men and women are equally powerless but that men and boys are being indoctrinated to admire women and to follow career paths that enable men to give women what women want.  For example:

What Are Boys Good For?

What does a teenage girl learn to give to a boy? Let's look at a thirteen-page spread in Teen-the Christmas 1984 issue. Approx­imately seventy presents are mentioned, with an average price of about thirty dollars (over two thousand dollars' [close to US$5,000 in 2007 dollars — F4L] worth of presents). Only one is for a male-pajamas for a baby boy. As with Ms., no presents for boyfriends.
    There are several teenage boys shown in the pictures. One admires a girl while she admires herself in the mirror; another is towing a girl's brand-new car. The same use of men as in Self.
   
Is the girl in the Teen spread helping the boy who has attached her car to a tow truck? No. She drapes herself over the tow truck. And how does she learn to handle a stressful situation? The caption explains: "If a stressful situation causes complexion concerns, keep skin under control with Noxzema Acne 12. And pass the time in an easy-to-wear wardrobe!"
    All twelve days of Christmas run the same pattern: "Keep tabs on your weight," "File your nails ... ," "Massage your hands," "Massage your feet," "Turn heads in your direction by keeping lips lusciously lubricated .... " What does he get? Nothing is mentioned but her beauty. What lessons does he learn? Admire and rescue. [Emphasis by F4L] In Teen. In Ms. In Self.
   
Do teenage boys' magazines show a girl towing his brand-new car, while he drapes himself over her tow truck and worries about his acne? Hardly.
    In men's magazines there are only a few gifts for men to buy women. Remember the principle of the De Beers transfer. She chooses the diamond and chooses among the men her beauty power can attract to buy it. Which is why his ads are for how to become successful enough to buy whatever she chooses; hers are to become beautiful enough to be able to make the choice of both the gift and the man to buy the gift. Men's magazines do not feature many gifts for women because men are expected to do the buying after consulting the women, not the magazine, and to concentrate their energies on making the money.

WHY MEN ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, By Warren Farrell, p 34-35

Once they become men (or perhaps even sooner), men (or boys) begin to catch on.  For example:

Why is changing a light bulb always a guy's job? Because women have more important things to do - like making men feel useful and important by giving them things to do, like changing light bulbs.

How many divorced men does it take to change a light bulb? None. They never get the house anyway.

Edmonton Journal,
2007 08 28, p. B2, Venting
(more at edmontonjournal.com Online Extras - Venting)

It will take quite some time yet, however, before a majority of society gets Warren Farrell's message expressed in the following.

One of the fascinating parts about men is our tendency to subject ourselves to war, physical abuse, and psychological abuse and call it "power." The ability to be totally out of control while continuing to view ourselves as the ones with the power can have certain advantages to a woman. As expressed in this poem:

One-Night Stand

He bought me drinks all evening
   in response to just a wink
Then accepted my invitation to
   repair my kitchen sink
Then I brought him into beddy-bye
   to get a little sex
Then couldn't help but smile
   when he called it conquest!

WHY MEN ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, By Warren Farrell, p. 289

That story, translated into a joke that is far more ironic than it is funny, goes like this:

An Irishman an Englishman and a Scotsman were sitting in a bar in Sydney. The view was fantastic, the beer excellent, and the food exceptional. "But" said the Scotsman, "I still prefer the pubs back home. Why, in Glasgow there's a little bar called McTavish's. Now the landlord there goes out of his way for the locals so much that when you buy 4 drinks he will buy the 5th drink for you."

"Well," said the Englishman "at my local, the Red Lion, the barman there will buy you your 3rd drink after you buy the first 2."

"Ahhh that's nothin'," said the Irishman, "Back home in Dublin there's Ryan's Bar. Now the moment you set foot in the place they'll buy you a drink, then another, all the drinks you like. Then when you've had enough drink they'll take you upstairs and see that you get laid. All on the house."

The Englishman and Scotsman immediately pour scorn on the Irishman's claims. He swears every word is true.

"Well," said the Englishman, "Did this actually happen to you?" 

"Not myself personally, no" said the Irishman, "but it did happen to my sister."

found at angryharry.com

Men's problem is that women's "powerlessness" has been amply addressed throughout the history of evolution, intensively so since the advent of radical feminism [*], but that men's powerlessness received little or no attention. Instead, men curry women's favors by giving women gifts, even the gift of men's lives.
   While in the past men were enticed to live up to the social duties imposed upon them with promises that they would be paid back for that through society paying them appreciation, honour and respect, today — thanks to decades of feminist slandering of men, intended to "increase" the social value of women — men are being vilified for being men, and not much else matters.

* If the term "radical feminism" (a.k.a. Marxist- or socialist-feminism) is somewhat new to you, you need to expand your knowledge.  After all, radical feminism, the currently controlling faction of feminism, governs just about everything that is happening in your life.  See,

Carey Roberts column

Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on political correctness. His best-known work is an exposé on Marxism and the roots of radical feminism.

Carey Roberts' best-known work, his exposé on Marxism and the Roots of Radical Feminism, is not necessarily easy to find, but this link will help with that. (Some of the URLs for the article series appear to keep changing.  For that reason the identified link leads to an Internet search for the series.  The first or second link in the return list will most likely lead you to the series.)

 

White RoseThe White Rose
Thoughts are Free

__________________
Posted 2003 10 20
Updates:
2003 11 04 (added Reference to The Politics of Melodrama)
2007 07 29 (added entry for WHY MEN ARE THE WAY THEY ARE)