logo for the website of Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | RSS button | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search

2013 04 15: Symantec (makers and distributors of Norton Antivirus) and O2 now filter/block the website of Fathers for Life and *BOTH* of its affiliated blogs. Click for details.


 
 Site Map (very large file)
 Table of Contents
 Activism
 Children—Our most valued assets?
 Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
 Child Support
 Civil Rights & Social Issues
 Families
 Family Law
 Destruction of Families
 Fatherhood
 Fatherlessness
 Divorce Issues
 Domestic Violence
 Feminism
 Gay Issues
 Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
 Health
 Help Lines for Men
 History
 Humour
 Law, Justice and The Judiciary
 Mail to F4L
 Men's Issues
 Suicide
 The Politics of "Sex"
 Our Most Popular Pages
 Email List
 Links
 References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Be notified of
page updates
it's private
powered by
ChangeDetection

BADGE
 of
RECOGNITION

censored-stamp

Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blog are being slandered and censored. (Click for Details)

If you are a fathers-rights or pro-family activist, then it is quite likely that your website or blog is being, slandered and censored, too. (Click to check that out)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The Price of Unrestrained Liberalism


According to information released Nov. 25, 1999 in the current issue of the annual debt report by the Fraser Institute,

the average Canadian family of four carries a government debt burden of almost half a million dollars.

At the rate of $28,000 in taxes that an average family of four pays on an annual income in the order of $50,000 — even if we were to stop feeding the politicians and bureaucracy who forced us into this horrenduous state of affairs — that debt will never be paid off at that rate.  Someone will somewhere along the line welsh on it.  There is simply no other choice.

A while ago I had attempted to construct an estimate of the total of the Canadian debt, going by a number of sources I had come across.  It was a pretty difficult process for me and even more difficult to keep up-to-date.  I hadn't been able to find a single comprehensive source of that information anywhere.  You would almost think that someone is trying very hard to hide something from us.  The results of what I had found are in a page titled "Does Moral Decline equal Economic Decline?", containing comments on information released last year by the Canadian Family Action Coalition.

Some other related articles and information I found are at "Families and Taxes" and "Trashing the US Tax Code, for the sake of the family."

What I had figured out was that when unfunded liabilities are included in the average federal debt of Canadians, and if the (then) $640 billion unfunded liability of the Employment Insurance scheme/scam is considered as well, the average amount of the federal debt to individual Canadians (every man, woman and child) is at more than $108 thousand.  To that must be added the provincial and municipal liabilities; in the case of children, the personal debts of their parents, and in the case of adults their own personal debts.

Not surprisingly, the Fraser Institute in its current debt report calculated a somewhat higher and more precise figure of $115,777 as to what the share of the total government debt is for each Canadian man, woman or child.  It is described in the appended article.

You may wonder why nobody in power seems to be worried.  Do you really think that they would tell anyone, even if they were?

You may think that the calculations must be off, because if there was truly such a massive amount of debt and liabilities, surely, someone, some creditor, would call in at least a portion of the debt; foreclose so to speak, force the government into declaring bankruptcy (which it should have done already before the Liberals had a chance to make an intolerable situation far worse). 

Well, you see, the answer to that is like this.  Anyone who ever had to determine who of his creditors or utility companies would be paid and which would not — out of a paycheque that didn't leave enough after taxes to pay everyone on time — will understand perfectly well how it is done.  You do it by making payments only when they absolutely must be made, like on the bank loans that would otherwise be called in.

For the governments, with the federal Liberal government far out in front, that takes care of the most important 20% of the accumulated debt.  The remaining $3 trillion or so are being hidden from everyone's view.   If we don't see that portion of the debt, we don't have to worry about it, and that's why nobody ever gets told about it.  We wouldn't want Canadians to worry their hearts out, would we?

However, be absolutely certain that this large hidden debt is very real.  It will come out in the open, it does come out in the open all of the time, in the form of "unforeseen" claims against the various government's unfunded taxation schemes, the contributions to which to secure them were long ago squandered away by funneling them into general revenue:  Old Age Security, Canada Pension Plan, Health Care, Employment Insurance and others.  Nevertheless, as I mentioned above, no amount of trying will enable us to make the kind of payments a debt that size requires.  That's why the unfunded liabilities keep on growing, and that's why the government keeps on cutting back on everything imaginable, just like anyone else who can't pay all of his bills.  But that doesn't make the debt go away.

No matter how much we hide it, no matter how much we deny it, it must be paid eventually.  It will be paid!  It will be paid by our children, by our grandchildren, by our great-grandchildren...you get the picture. 

When our descendents learn the truth about what their parents, grandparents, and Jean Chretien and the Liberal Party have done to them, it may well be that Hitler's reputation will look great in comparison.  But, as I said, let's not worry about any of that.  It's not our problem.  Our kids will come to terms with all of that, right?  After all, isn't all of what the Liberal Party does "in the best interest of our children?"

If things like that are being perpetrated by private companies, they are viewed for many different good reasons as very serious criminal offences, and the directors of companies and corporations engaged in such nefarious financial shenanigans will spend a considerable amount of time behind bars.  But, our Liberal government, which has no qualms about lying to us when it promises "We'll kill the GST," or that it will cut taxes, or which tells us that lesbian "families" (by far the most violent and unstable) are as good for the upbringing of children as are good-old families headed by good-old mom and dad (the most stable, with a rate of violence more than ten times lower than that in lesbian "families"), can do with impunity whatever it chooses.  And if it should happen by chance that what the Liberal government wants to do won't be acceptable in Parliament, then there's always the Supreme Court that can make sure that things go the way they are planned, like making sure that the Natives get all of their $200 billion settlement claims, or like making female civil servants happy, who get $3.6 billion in back pay for the hardships they suffered by not earning as much working as telephone operators as did the men sitting on their butts all day driving trucks, bulldozers and other heavy machinery.

As to the problems posed by all of this, "...there are, as yet, no Canadian solutions proposed to deal with them," says Jason Clemens, Director of Fiscal Studies at The Fraser Institute.

We don't need any new solutions.  It's all of the new and Liberal "solutions" that caused the mess in the first place.  You know what the solution to all of this is, right?  It'll work.  It'll work well.  It worked well before and will do so again. It'll be the only possible alternative that'll save us from total collapse.  We'll have to cut taxes, first of all, and then engage on a program to reconstruct our families.  After all, it will be our families who'll carry the burden of looking after and solving the problems created by our government. Real families, and not "lesbian families," are the best, most effective and cheapest welfare system ever devised, as long as we keep the government out of their lives.

The solution is not, as the Liberal Party is so diligently trying to achieve, the destruction of our families and to get rid of them once and for all.  It seems to me that we would be far better off to get instead rid of the Liberal government once and for all.

So, what do you think?  Is it true that Canada, which came — as a result of Liberal bumbling and arrogance — to be by far one of the most severely indebted countries in the world, can truly be the best country of all in the world to live in?  I don't think so, do you?  Maybe we should ask Jean Chretien one more time, just to be sure.  He's always so full of — confidence and certainty?  Maybe if we listen to him just one more time we'll all come to believe him, and all of our and our children's problems will go away.  Yeah, sure.

Walter H. Schneider


The top-ranking of frequently told lies:

"I'm from the government and I'm here to help you."

"I'm from the UN and intend to protect your civil liberties."

"What we do is in the best interest of the child."

"The fight for women's rights is a fight for equal rights."

The costs of these and other lies by government officials constitute a debt in the order of $244,000 for each Canadian taxpayer.


Each Canadian is on the hook for $116,000, according to annual Fraser Institute study

    Contact:
    Jason Clemens, Director of Fiscal Studies
    The Fraser Institute, (604) 714-4544 Email: jasonc@fraserinstitute.ca

    Release Date: 25 November 1999
VANCOUVER, BC>>> According to The Fraser Institute's yearly debt study, federal, provincial, and local governments have accumulated a staggering $850 billion in direct debt and $3.5 trillion in total government liabilities. This translates into each man, woman, and child in Canada owing $115,777 in total liabilities-almost four times the average Canadian salary.

The study, Canadian Government Debt 1999: A Guide to the Indebtedness of Canada and the Provinces shows that from 1994 to 1998, direct debt (what most people and governments refer to as "the debt") has grown from $739 billion to $850 billion, a 15 percent increase. Total liabilities have increased from $2.9 to $3.5 trillion during the same period, an increase of 21 percent. Most of the increase in total liabilities is due to substantial increase in unfunded liabilities.

Among the provinces, Ontario carries the heaviest burden, in part because the allocation of federal liabilities is based on the contributions made to the federal treasury. Federal, provincial and local liabilities add up to $126,938 for each Ontarian. Albertans are next at $119,464, followed by Quebecers at $114,248, and British Columbians at $108,441 (Table 1). Maritimers owe less than the average Canadian because of their lower contributions to the federal treasury.

Definition of Liabilities

Total liabilities include direct debt, debt guarantees, contractual commitments, contingent liabilities, and obligations. Direct debt includes the accumulated net debt incurred by a government and all its agencies. Unfunded liabilities include programs and benefits that government has committed to provide in perpetuity, such as Old Age Security (OAS), the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), and health care.

Unfunded Liabilities are the Most Serious Concern

Most of the total liabilities are due to the unfunded liabilities of the health care system, OAS, and the CPP.

The CPP unfunded liability alone grew by 58.8 percent between 1992 and 1998. In total, CPP, OAS, and healthcare unfunded liabilities grew by 45.6 percent during that same period.

At their inception, these programs were based on the assumption that population demographics, economic growth rates, and wage increases prevalent in the 1960s would continue indefinitely. It was considered favourable social and economic policy to transfer a small amount of money from a large group of younger workers to benefit a small group of relatively poor retirees.

These assumptions were patently wrong. Birth rates have declined, income growth has stagnated, and mortality rates have decreased. In 1995, seniors represented 19.8 percent of the working age population, this figure is expected to increase to 38.9 percent by 2030. These demographic changes will continue to undermine the ability of these plans to provide the intended level of benefits.

The federal government and many provincial governments are in surplus. Now is the time to look at the current structure and long term viability of our health care system and income support programs, namely OAS. "While the direct debt of governments is beginning to decline absolutely and as a fraction of our total national income, obligations are trending steadily upwards. Canadians are just beginning to recognize the significant challenge posed by these accumulating obligations and there are, as yet, no Canadian solutions proposed to deal with them," says Jason Clemens, Director of Fiscal Studies at The Fraser Institute.

Canada Compared to the World: The Severely Indebted Country (SIC) List International comparisons allow Canadians to get an idea of the relative severity of Canada's debt burden. A standard feature of The Fraser Institute's annual debt study is a ranking of 146 countries based on their debt as a percent of discretionary income.

More important than Canada's overall debt ranking is our relative ranking against other high income OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) nations, where Canada ranks third lowest (27th)-only Italy and Belgium rank lower. The United States ranks 12th among the OECD. Among G-7 nations, Canada is second last. While Canada is considerably above Italy, it is also significantly below other G-7 nations. Japan ranks twelfth overall and first in the G-7 with a debt-to-discretionary-income ratio of 16.5 percent. Canada ranks sixth among G-7 nations with a ratio of 68.2 percent and ranks 81st overall among the 146 nations in the Severely Indebted Country (SIC) List.

"The assessment of Canada's indebtedness demands continued caution, vigilance, and prudence. We must be cautious to ensure that we do not permit apathy to erode the recent gains in fiscal security. We must be vigilant that we do not assume new and larger obligations; we must be prudent in forming policies to deal with those that already exist," concludes Clemens.

------------

Established in 1974, The Fraser Institute is an independent public policy organization based in Vancouver.

For further information contact:

    Suzanne Walters, Director of Communications,
    The Fraser Institute, (604) 714-4582,
    Email suzannew@fraserinstitute.ca


The charts shown below indicate Canada's fiscal rank in relation to other countries on the list of countries examined by the Fraser Institute. The source of the data is Appendix D in the 1999 Annual Debt Report produced by the Fraser Institute.

The specific URLs where the data are located are as follows:

publications/critical_issues/1999/debt/section_10_1
publications/critical_issues/1999/debt/section_10_2.html>
publications/critical_issues/1999/debt/section_10_3.html>
publications/critical_issues/1999/debt/section_10_4.html>
publications/critical_issues/1999/debt/section_10_5.html>
publications/critical_issues/1999/debt/section_10_6.html>

Note: When looking at the charts shown above, keep in mind that the debt figures shown don't include unfunded liabilities or those obligations that the politicians don't usually (it would perhaps be better to say, EVER) include when they talk about the accumulated budget deficit.  It is very likely that what has become common practice in Canada is also practiced in the US and the other OECD countries.  Only one thing is apt to describe such creative fiscal reporting.  It would be exceedingly rare for any corporation to survive for long if it hides from such unpleasant realities.

The G-7 Nations are comprised of the United States, Canada, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan.
 

About OECD:

OECD stands for Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

The OECD brings together 29 countries sharing the principles of the market economy, pluralist democracy and respect for human rights. The original 20 members of the OECD are located in Western countries of Europe and North America. Next came Japan, Australia, New Zealand and Finland. More recently, Mexico, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Korea have joined.  

OECD Member Nations
Australia (1971)
Austria (1961)
Belgium (1961)
Canada (1961)
Czech Republic (1995)
Denmark (1961)
Finland (1969)
France (1961)
Germany (1961)
Greece (1961)
Hungary (1996)
Iceland (1961)
Ireland (1961)
Italy (1961)
Japan (1964)
Korea (1996)
Luxembourg (1961)
Mexico (1994)
The Netherlands (1961)
New Zealand (1973)
Norway (1961)
Poland (1996)
Portugal (1961)
Spain (1961)
Sweden (1961)
Switzerland (1961)
Turkey (1961)
United Kingdom (1961)
United States (1961)

It makes one wonder.  Does it not look as if membership in the OECD virtually guarantees severe indebtedness for a member and as if the level of indebtedness is at least to some extent a related to the duration of a country's membership?  Could it be that it would be better for all of us if the OECD were to dissolve and make room for normal market interactions instead of manipulating the global economy?

If you have concerns about these and other issues related to the condition of seniors, visit, contact and perhaps even join:

SUN Seniors United Now

The up- and coming, rapidly-growing advocacy organization for seniors (55 years and over) in Alberta

There are in the order of about half a million or more people of age 55 and over in Alberta. If all of them were to join SUN, they would become the most powerful advocacy organization in Alberta; and seniors would no longer be robbed of their comforts and otherwise ignored.
   At the price of one package of cigarettes seniors will be able to gain a voice that will be heard by a government that otherwise can and will take from seniors what they worked for all their life to enjoy in their old age.

If you are concerned about how seniors are affected by the planned, systematic destruction of our families and society, a search at google.com (for elderly OR seniors OR grandparent OR grandfather OR grandmother site:http://fathersforlife.org) will provide you with the links to about 80 web pages at Fathers for Life that will be of interest to you.

____________________
Posted 1999 11 29
Updates:
2001 02 09 (format changes)
2004 06 24 (added entry for SUN — Seniors United Now)