The Rockefeller Foundation is mentioned time-and-again in Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences, such as in Chapter 8 "Kinsey's Impact on American Law":

...The Rockefeller Foundation's knowledge of the research flaws [in Kinsey's data] is certain; however, they continued to fund its use in the Model Penal Code anyway.

    The continuously repeated misrepresentation by Rockefeller and Indiana University that Kinsey had a "well-developed methodology"⁴³ is refuted by the 1950 report from Warren Weaver, then director of of the Natural Science Division of the Rockefeller Foundation.  He documented for the Foundation what would have been an insurmountable fact for honorable men: that Kinsey's data were totally invalid statistically.⁴⁴  However, this stubborn scientific fact did not stop the official actions of the Rockefeller Foundation.  By 1950, Rockefeller was funding the American Law Institute with the mission to re-craft "fixed" American law including the state laws regarding sex offenders based upon Kinsey's invalid research. [p. 201]

THREE PIONEERING ACADEMIC SEX STUDY CENTERS

Of the three pioneering academic sex centers, the National Sex & Drug Forum in San Francisco, started in 1968 and renamed The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality ([IASHS] hereafter called the "Sex Institute") offers the most extensive training and advanced degrees.  The "Sex Institute" was directed by Dr. Wardell Pomeroy, Penthouse Forum Board member and Kinsey co-author, and Hustler Magazine contributors, Drs. Ted Mcllvena and Erwin Haberlae.
      Another accredited sexology degree became available in 1964 from the New York University Health Department, School of Education, under homosexual activist Deryck Calderwood, who died of AIDS. In 1978 the University of Pennsylvania Department of  Health, School of Education began offering similar Kinseyan New Biology training and degrees, directed by homosexual advocate Kenneth George.
      As of this writing, the Sex Institute in San Francisco offers a doctorate of Education, four graduate programs and seven basic credentials, including a "Safe Sex Certificate" which can he obtained swiftly with little or no prior training.  The Sex Institute Dean,  Wardell Pomeroy, explained that the Sex Institute accepts advanced sex degree applicants "off the street," if they are without preconceptions about sexual mores.  The demand for Kinseyan-only standards is seen in the Sex Institute's codified ethical oath which legitimizes the Kinsey New Biology model of "consensual" adult-child sex, incest, child prostitution and/or child pornography.
    The Sex Institute's degree program includes "advanced graduate" studies such as: "erotic sensate and massage therapy," and focuses most of its scholarly training on student viewing, using, even making, erotic" films.  Other key credit courses include how to use sex surrogates (prostitutes) in sex therapy and the analysis of the Kinsey reports.  Of general interest is the fact that the Sex Institute provides training in the design and implementation of "sex education curricula" for all ages.  Dr. Pomeroy teaches child sexuality.  "Forensic sexology" is a popular course.  These now-accredited Sex Institute experts commonly testify for sex offenders and for businesses which specialize in the production of obscenity and pornography.⁹³
     "Experts" from the American sexual establishment regularly testify in courts and provide their expertise to legislatures and other public agencies.  For example, in 1980, Wardell Pomeroy testified for a pornographer in Happy Day v. Kentucky, a court case in which Pomeroy admitted under oath to seeking funds from the sex industry to produce his own child pornography.⁹⁴
     The March 1991, "Department of Defense Report on Homosexuality and Personnel Security" cites Kinsey and Pomeroy, Gebhard, Martin, Gagnon, Ford and Beach, Bell and Weinburg, self-identified Journal of Paedophilia editor Vern Bullough, and pedophile advocate Dr. John Money as DoD consultants.⁹⁵ These men defined the scientific facts about human sexual conduct for subsequent DoD's decisions to recommend acceptance of homosexuals in the military.  The  1993 Rand study of homosexuality in the armed forces was similarly based in significant part on Kinsey's findings of human sexuality.
     Many of the Sex Institute's sex films, and now videos, have been distributed by "Focus International" to universities and colleges nationwide.  Among their other "erotic" media, Focus offers "The Kinsey Three (Hereto, Homo & Bisexuality);" and "About Your Sexuality" for junior high children, inclusive of condomless heterosexual and homosexual anal sodomy scenes.  All three centers.  "The  Sex Institute" (IASHS), NYU and University of Pennsylvania have long taught sex using the Sexual Attitude Restructuring (SAR) technique.  As Kinsey co-author, documented pornographer, and Kinsey sex partner Pomeroy said, "The SAR is designed to "desensitize," that is to disinhibit, all viewers. [p. 172 -174]

SEXUAL ATTUDE RESTRUCTURING (THE SAR)

 In December 1982, George Leonard reported his Sexual Attitude Restructuring (SAR) experience in Esquire magazine. [Esquire: The End of Sex, p. 24]   Noting at least 60,000 people trained in colleges and university by the SAR beginning in the early 1980s, Leonard expects his experience is typical:

The sensory overload culminated on Saturday night in a multi-media event called the F—korama ... in the darkness ... images of human beings - and some-times even animals — engaging in every conceivable sexual act, accompanied by wails, squeals, moans, shouts, and the first movement of the Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto.  Some seventeen simultaneous moving pictures ... Over a period of several hours, there came a moment when the four images on the wall were of a gay male couple, a straight couple, a lesbian couple, and a bestial group.  The subjects were nude,...I felt myself becoming disoriented ... was she kissing a man or a woman?  I struggled to force the acts I was watching into their proper boxes ... and now I couldn't remember which was which.  Wasn't I supposed to make these discriminations?  I searched for clues.  There were none.  I began to feel uncomfortable.  Soon I realized that to avoid vertigo and nausea I would have to give up the attempt to discriminate and simply surrender to the experience ... The differences for which lives have been ruined, were not only trivial, but invisible.  By the end ... Nothing was shocking .... But nothing was sacred either.  But as I drove home, I began to get a slightly uneasy feeling.  It was almost as if I had been conned ... by my own conditioned response of taking the most liberated position ... whatever my deeper feelings .... love had not been mentioned a single time during the entire weekend.

     The SAR has served as a critical tool to shape views of human sexuality.  This New Biology media, an orgy of public and variant sexual couplings on film and video, is regularly utilized in academia to restructure educated sexual attitudes into Kinseyan sexuality.  To understand how this works, it is useful to momentarily study the mechanics of the SAR in desensitization and disinhibition of the human brain to allow the shift in pedagogical attitude and teaching.  The SAR literally  scars the viewer's brain as it short circuits his and her conscience.
    On the evidence, the SAR high resonance images psychopharmacologically and neurochemically mold, coarsen and reform viewer's brains, minds and memories.  Neuroscientist, Dr. Gary Lynch, says:

What we're saying here is that an event which lasts half a second, within five or ten minutes has produced a structural change that is in some ways as profound as the structural changes one sees in (brain) damage.⁹⁶[pp. 174 - 175]

SIECUS

"...SIECUS's new leader, Dr. Mary Calderone, past medical director of Planned Parenthood, was the direct link between Kinsey's university-based research, Planned Parenthood's grassroots outreach, and SIECUS as a:  

Resource Centre [operating]
Specialized Programs to
Distribute Information about
Human sexuality [through] learned journals, research studies, training materials for health professionals and sample classroom curricula.^[103]" [p. 178]

_______________________
From notes for Chapter 7:

93.	One California college-level sex course, taught by Barry Singer, Board member of Society for the Scientific Study of Sex's Journal of Sex Research, reached the press.  It provides some insight into how one receives extra credit in some sexology courses.  Dr. Singer taught his students as he had been taught.  Hence, his field-work included extra credit to married students who would engage in adultery, and "straight" students who would engage in homosexual sex.  The "field" research, including trips to gay bars, swingers' clubs, etc., is typical of the kinds of courses offered through other credentialed sexuality institutes. Time, June 7, 1982, p. 49.
94.	Defining terms, we use the word "pornography" in quotes. Obscenity is neutralized in meaning and effect by using the word pornography which implies that there is a moderate recreational, or "harmless" level of obscenity.  In illustrating again a shift in standard from absolute obscenity to the variant "pornography," an historical context is helpful.  In the printing of the 1828 Webster's Dictionary, "pornography" was not included.  Only "obscenity" was defined in the words, images and concepts America today calls pornography, were simply understood by our founders to be obscene or earlier yet, unchaste.  Pornography, from the Greek pornea means "fornication" meaning "writing about or drawing on prostitutes." Somewhere between 1828 and 1857 pornography was transported to America from England and Europe.
95.	Paidika: Journal of Paedophilia, "Statement of Purpose," Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Sept. 1987, Vol. 1, pp. 2-3.
96.	The Brain: Learning and Memory, The Annenberg, CPB Collection, Santa Barbara, CA., WNET, 1984.
103.	SIECUS brochure, "Are you going to stand by; will you?" undated, circa late 1980s.
The "Fix" That's Destroying Education In America Have no illusions that the problems with America's education system are national ones. Once you read Tom DeWeese's article and know who's behind "The Fix", you'll come to the conclusion that you know also why "The Fix" is destroying education in all developed nations.  Furthermore, you will know why the current push for sex-education is such a large part of it.