|
Family Issues — Main Page
Note: The index of articles on family issues presented on this page is not
exhaustive. The website of Fathers for Life contains hundreds more
articles discussing family issues. Use the search
facilities accessible at this site or on the Net to find all of the articles
on this site that address the topic of your choice.
Some of the articles on this page are shown more than once. That was
done to group articles within a specific context, so as to make more extensive
reading of the context of a given issue easier to accomplish.
Faith and Families
See also:
Families — what they where, what many think they should or should not be, and what
they ought to be: a permanent union for a man and a woman, the best possible environment in which to raise the
next generation of well-functioning citizens; the healthiest, safest, wealthiest and least violent
environment for women, men and children.
Freedom, Equality, and Society's Treatment of Men and Families
A discussion of the totalitarian roots of the politics of sex and the implementation of the agenda
for the planned destruction of our families
The use of force to achieve equality of outcome destroys freedom and families. To bring equality of outcome
about for women requires discrimination against men and massive asset- and income-transfers from men to women.
It's a lure that many women find impossible to resist. On the other hand, men, as well as women, are lured
also through sexual freedom (the early communists called it "free love") although there is nothing free about
free love. Both trends motivate more and more people to forego the altruism of families for the care by Father
State via increasingly harsh, progressive and family-hostile taxation.
In the course of the implementation of the agenda for the planned destruction of
our families, in all nations in whom the concept of western chivalry is
part of social traditions, men die between six to fourteen years sooner than women
do. The two most
populous nations on Earth experience virtually no differences in the average life expectancies of the sexes. Full Story
In
WHY
MEN ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, Warren Farrell explains that men and women
are equally powerless but that men and boys are being indoctrinated to
admire women and to follow career paths that enable men to give women what
women want. For example:
What Are Boys Good For?
What does a teenage girl learn to give to a
boy? Let's look at a thirteen-page spread in Teen-the Christmas 1984
issue. Approximately seventy presents are mentioned, with an average price
of about thirty dollars (over two thousand dollars' [close to US$5,000 in
2007 dollars — F4L] worth of presents). Only one is for a male-pajamas
for a baby boy. As with Ms., no presents for boyfriends.
There are several teenage boys shown in the
pictures. One admires a girl while she admires herself in the mirror;
another is towing a girl's brand-new car. The same use of men as in
Self.
Is the girl in the Teen spread helping
the boy who has attached her car to a tow truck? No. She drapes herself over
the tow truck. And how does she learn to handle a stressful situation? The
caption explains: "If a stressful situation causes complexion concerns, keep
skin under control with Noxzema Acne 12. And pass the time in an
easy-to-wear wardrobe!"
All twelve days of Christmas run the same
pattern: "Keep tabs on your weight," "File your nails ... ," "Massage your
hands," "Massage your feet," "Turn heads in your direction by keeping lips
lusciously lubricated .... " What does he get? Nothing is mentioned but her
beauty. What lessons does he learn? Admire and rescue. [Emphasis
by F4L] In Teen. In Ms.
In Self.
Do teenage boys' magazines show a girl towing
his brand-new car, while he drapes himself over her tow truck and
worries about his acne? Hardly.
In men's magazines there are only a few gifts
for men to buy women. Remember the principle of the De Beers transfer. She
chooses the diamond and chooses among the men her beauty power can attract
to buy it. Which is why his ads are for how to become successful enough to
buy whatever she chooses; hers are to become beautiful enough to be able to
make the choice of both the gift and the man to buy the gift. Men's
magazines do not feature many gifts for women because men are expected to do
the buying after consulting the women, not the magazine, and to concentrate
their energies on making the money.
WHY MEN
ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, By Warren Farrell, p 34-35
Once they become men (or perhaps even sooner), men
(or boys) begin to catch on. For example:
Why is changing a light bulb always a guy's job? Because women have more
important things to do - like making men feel useful and important by giving
them things to do, like changing light bulbs.
How many divorced men does it take to change a light bulb? None. They never
get the house anyway.
— Edmonton Journal,
2007 08 28, p. B2, Venting
(more at
edmontonjournal.com Online Extras - Venting)
It will take quite some time yet, however, before a majority of
society gets Warren Farrell's message expressed in the following.
One of the fascinating
parts about men is our tendency to subject ourselves to war, physical abuse,
and psychological abuse and call it "power." The ability to be totally out
of control while continuing to view ourselves as the ones with the power can
have certain advantages to a woman. As expressed in this poem:
One-Night Stand
He bought me
drinks all evening
in response to just a wink
Then accepted my invitation to
repair my kitchen sink
Then I brought him into beddy-bye
to get a little sex
Then couldn't help but smile
when he called it conquest!
WHY MEN
ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, By Warren Farrell, p.
289
That story, translated into a joke that is far more ironic than
it is funny, goes like this:
An Irishman an Englishman and a Scotsman were sitting in a
bar in Sydney. The view was fantastic, the beer excellent, and the food
exceptional. "But" said the Scotsman, "I still prefer the pubs back home. Why,
in Glasgow there's a little bar called McTavish's. Now the landlord there
goes out of his way for the locals so much that when you buy 4 drinks he
will buy the 5th drink for you."
"Well," said the Englishman "at my local, the Red Lion, the barman there will
buy you your 3rd drink after you buy the first 2."
"Ahhh that's nothin'," said the Irishman, "Back home in Dublin there's Ryan's
Bar. Now the moment you set foot in the place they'll buy you a drink, then
another, all the drinks you like. Then when you've had enough drink they'll
take you upstairs and see that you get laid. All on the house."
The Englishman and Scotsman immediately pour scorn on the Irishman's claims.
He swears every word is true.
"Well," said the Englishman, "Did this actually happen to you?"
"Not myself personally, no" said the Irishman, "but it did happen to my
sister."
found at angryharry.com
Men's problem is that
women's "powerlessness" has been amply addressed throughout the history of
evolution, intensively so since the advent of radical feminism
[*], but that men's
powerlessness received little or no attention. Instead, men curry women's favors
by giving women gifts, even the gift of men's lives.
While in the past men were enticed to live up to the social duties
imposed upon them with promises that they would be paid back for that through
society paying them appreciation, honour and respect, today
— thanks to decades of feminist slandering of men, intended to "increase"
the social value of women — men are being vilified for being men, and not much else matters.
* If the term "radical feminism" (a.k.a.
Marxist- or socialist-feminism) is somewhat new to you, you need to expand
your knowledge. After all, radical feminism, the currently controlling
faction of feminism, governs just about everything that is happening in your
life. See,
Carey Roberts column
Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on political correctness.
His best-known work was an exposé on Marxism and radical feminism.
Carey Roberts' best-known work, his exposé on Marxism and
radical feminism, is not necessarily easy to find, but
this link will help with that. (Some of the URLs for the article
series appear to keep changing. For that reason the identified link
leads to an Internet search for the series. The first or second link in
the return list will most likely lead you to the series.)
The Marriage Premium; A book – and an institution – gets exonerated.
(Commentary,
graphs and a link to the research paper being commented on)
For the first time in the history of research on marriage, Ginther and Zovodny appear to have
successfully shown that the "marriage premium" – the tendency of married individuals to make more money than
single people – is an actual effect of marriage, and not just a function of a preference shown by both
employers and potential spouses for people with qualities likely to bring about success.
The following graph has been constructed from data in the research paper. It
compares hourly wages for three groups of men:
Never married men Married men whose marriage was not followed by a birth within seven months of marriage., and Married men whose marriage was followed by a birth within seven months of marriage.
-
Society: The Third Marriage
Partner
By William Gairdner, For The National Post, April 9,
1999
...Well it’s time to get a grip. Until very recently the
natural family - a married mother and father living with their dependent
children - was considered the very foundation and living model for a
healthy and free society. Not the only way to live, of course,
but the best social arrangement. The main aim of marriage was
not primarily to please the “partners” but to ensure that society could
provide a morally and economically stable private environment for the
rearing of its millions of children, and a haven for the care and
feeding of millions more - such as aging parents and infirm spouses -
who are no longer “self-sufficient.”
Originally, freedom-loving people in the West insisted on this moral
idea of marriage as a religious, or at least a social sacrament, largely
because they did not want human life secularized and controlled by the
state. So in contrast to today’s pathetic notion, the promises made by
bride and groom were understood as made not merely to each other, but to
society as a whole, and not as a joke - a so-called “contract”
unilaterally dissolvable by the first disgruntled party - but as a
serious compact with procreative society itself. Dissolution, if
permitted at all, required the consent of both parties and of society.
It was a good method for keeping parents and their children out of the
hands of the state, and a powerful warning to let society do the job of
organizing itself.
That’s why the radicals of Western civilization from Plato, to Rousseau,
to Marx and modern feminists, have expressly hated this idea of marriage
and the family. They know it engenders overwhelming loyalty to a free
society, to home, hearth, and blood relations instead of to the state,
and even worse for them, it diverts wealth to private purposes instead
of public coffers. So Plato proposed removing all children from parents
at birth to be raised in national daycare; Marx and Engels ditto. The
humanity-lover Rousseau, a self-styled “child of Plato,” gave his five
kids up to an orphanage where they all promptly died. Radical feminists
have always wanted the rest of us to look after their children so they
can duke it out with men in the market....(Full
Story)
Defense of Marriage requires a constitutional amendment
 President Bush [2004 02 24]: ...a few judges and local
authorities are presuming to change the most fundamental institution of civilization. Their actions have
created confusion on an issue that requires clarity....Ages of experience have taught humanity that the
commitment of a husband and wife to love and to serve one another promotes the welfare of children and the
stability of society....Today I call upon the Congress to promptly pass, and to send to the states for
ratification, an amendment to our Constitution defining and protecting marriage as a union of man and woman as
husband and wife....
(Full Statement) How modern culture erodes family ties
by Andrew Bolt, 2001 04 21, in NewsWeekly, an independent fortnightly publication of the National Civic
Council, Australia
Assaults on the family as an institution are more subtle now than ever before, but Herald Sun columnist
Andrew Bolt warns of the State's continuing power to undermine parental responsibility.
Although the examples that Andrew Bolt uses largely have an Australian context, they are representative of
global trends.
Full Story
A Heritage Foundation report that
identifies beyond any doubt that the epidemic of divorce is destroying society
Full Story
The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada (EFC) made a submission to the Law Commission of
Canada, as part of their consultation on "Close Personal Relationships," arguing that marriage is unique and
should retain its distinct status in law. This EFC submission can be viewed at:
http://www.efc-canada.com/na/briefs/marr21.htm Related to that, look up the working papers of the National
Survey of Families and Households.
By Barbara Dafoe Whitehead (on families,
cohabiting, divorce, single motherhood, and the impact of modern family politics on children and society) Full Story
By Barbara Dafoe Whitehead, Ph.D, Co-director, National Marriage Project, Rutgers, the State
University of New Jersey, before the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, Subcommittee on
Children and Families, U.S. Senate; April 28, 2004
Full Story
I would like to address three questions:
- What is marriage for?
- What do we know about the benefits of marriage for children and adults?
- How
does marriage benefit the society?
By Ted Morton, political science professor at the
University of Calgary and Reform Party of Canada 'senator-in-waiting'.
Full Story
A Heritage Foundation Report, June 11, 1999 (Please be sure to read the full text
of this very important report. It contains facts and recommendations that are simply astounding! It
is available as a PDF file at the indicated link.)
Full Story
Full Story
Some years ago a British journalist returned from Sweden saying: "I have seen the Future and
it doesn't work." Despite much evidence of the truth of that observation, many Americans - especially those in
sociology and related disciplines - help maintain the belief in the myth that Sweden's Welfare State is still
a model for us and others to emulate. ...
Full story:
Destroying the
Family: Swedish Style, By Eric Brodin
That article, published in the Washington Inquirer, was excerpted from Eric Brodin's address
given to the Eagle Forum's Annual Conference, Washington, D.C., on September 21, 1985. It's too bad that
nobody heeded it. The planned destruction of the family,
with aims, methods and consequences clearly identified by Karl Marx and
Friedrich Engels in their Communist Manifesto in 1848/49, is proceeding
unabatedly in all developed nations.
The Politics of Fatherhood,
Stephen Baskerville, Ph.D., Howard University; peer-reviewed article in PS: Political Science and
Politics, vol. 35, no. 4 (December 2002).
....Virtually every major social pathology has been linked to fatherlessness: violent crime,
drug and alcohol abuse, truancy, teen pregnancy, suicide—all correlate more strongly to fatherlessness than
to any other single factor. The majority of prisoners, juvenile detention inmates, high school dropouts,
pregnant teenagers, adolescent murderers, and rapists all come from fatherless homes. The connection is so
strong that controlling for fatherlessness erases the relationships between race and crime and between low
income and crime....
....Fatherlessness and the judicial–bureaucratic machinery connected
with it have grown up together as increasingly worldwide phenomena....
(Full Story)
What Has Government Done to Our Families?
By Allan Carlson, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Jan. 6, 2004
The Politics of Family Destruction,
by Stephen Baskerville, Ph.D.
Crisis magazine, November 2002 The Planned
Destruction of the Family
by Erin Pizzey, founder of the Women's Shelter Movement Eeva Sodhi responds to the inauguration of Shelternet, an Ontario-based and nationally funded
Internet resource for abused women.
As an "abused" woman, Eeva Sodhi voices very strong reservations.
Full Story
From Marxism to Feminism: The
planned destruction of the American family
Statement of Bill Wood
FC-8 Hearing on Waste, Fraud, and Abuse July 17, 2003
TESTIMONY FOR THE [US] WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
The planned destruction of the family was part of the communist agenda from its
inception by Karl Marx and Frederic Engels. It became government policy in the USSR in about
1917. It was so successful in the USSR that it threatened to destroy society
there. Curiously,
while in the 1940s the USSR took steps to repair the damages its family-hostile policies had caused,
American communists imported the Soviet agenda for the planned destruction of the family into the USA.
It has been and continues to be promoted by left-leaning liberals in the West ever since.
| An employer can at any time dismiss an employee
without justification and have that employee imprisoned if he objects too strongly to his dismissal. For
example, if the employee raises his voice in anger he may be arrested for 'violence'. In any event, an
employer can dismiss an employee regardless of the circumstances, and at his sole discretion. He can fire
him from his job whenever he wishes, no matter how long the employee has served with the company and even
if the employee has done absolutely nothing wrong. Further, the employer can insist that the employee is
evicted from his own house and never allowed to re-enter it. An employer may further demand that the
sacked employee must, under threat of imprisonment, forfeit part of any future income to the employer for
some considerable time into the future. |
How about the following version? Do you think that it will be an improvement?
| A woman can at any time dismiss her male partner
without justification and have that partner imprisoned if he objects too strongly to his dismissal. For
example, if he raises his voice in anger he may be arrested for 'domestic violence'. In any event, a
woman can dismiss the man regardless of the circumstances and at her sole discretion. She can fire him
from his jobs as father and partner whenever she wishes, no matter how long he has served the family and
even if he has done absolutely nothing wrong. Further, the woman can insist that the man is evicted from
his own house and never allowed to re-enter it. If she has children, a woman may further demand that her
sacked partner must, under threat of imprisonment, forfeit part of any future income to the woman and
her children for some considerable time into the future - and this is the case even if her children turn
out not to be his. |
See the extensive
discussion of the two "contracts," of which the second one is sadly the reality that feminism gradually
imposed on society during the last three decades or so.* For additional details regarding the
reality of today's marriages or, for that matter, any relationship between men and women, refer also to
advice for men.
_____________
* A note of caution: The discussion of the "contracts" makes extensive references to recent US
statistics on spousal murders. The assumption in the discussion is that the statistics pertaining to men and
women who became victims of spousal murders are equally valid. That is a wrong assumption.
The declining number of men classified as having been murdered by intimates is most likely
due to the escalating efforts by feminists to hold women blameless under any and all circumstances.
Men comprise the vast and overwhelming majority of victims in a very large proportion of
unsolved murder cases. It is quite likely that a large proportion of those male victims of these
unsolved murder cases are victims of spousal murders.
Furthermore, women are less likely to be suspected, many
times more likely than men not to be prosecuted or to be acquitted, twice as likely as men to use contract killers, and more likely than men to
have their murder charges pleaded down to lesser charges such as manslaughter or accidental deaths.
Therefore many spousal murders committed by women will never show up as domestic violence
crimes.
For a detailed discussion of these circumstances refer to
Spousal Homicide and Research, by Eeva Sodhi.
Most importantly, spousal murders comprise a very small proportion of all murders and an insignificant
fraction of all causes of deaths, smaller than the deaths caused by surgical misadventure
or by falling out of bed. (See
US Leading Causes of Death
and
Falling out of Bed)
Lest anyone should think that marriage is the most dangerous of all social circumstances for women to be
in, consider that married and widowed women have far greater life expectancies than those who never become
married, and that divorced women have a greater risk of dying than those who stay married.
Welfare to "families" results in farewell to the family.
The report provides hard evidence that a reduction in the easy availability of welfare results without any
doubt in a general strengthening of marriages, the reduction of poverty and hunger and, most importantly, a
halt to escalating numbers of illegitimate births -- contrary to all of the dire predictions of disaster that
were made by feminists and other liberals when they attempted to prevent the Welfare Reform Bill from passing.
The report makes very strong recommendations that, in view of the positive results of the welfare reform in
the US, at least 10 percent of the funding for TANF should be used for measures aimed directly at
strengthening the family.
Despite all the advances in radiation treatment and chemotherapy, one of the best aids to surviving
cancer comes not from the oncology clinic but from the wedding chapel.
Full Story
Family Law
In today's society, modern liberals, family-hostile feminists and do-gooders dominate and control the
justice system to wage an all-out war on our families. The objective appears to be to remove fathers from the
lives of their children. If that concerns you — it should — and if you labour under the illusion that men and
their children can obtain equitable justice in the courts, well, think again! Check the Families and
the Justice System Index
- A note about the family courts:
The family court system was set up in the late sixties to alleviate the burden on the civil- and criminal
courts. The vastly increased number of divorces that those courts had to deal with then resulted from the
divorce-law reforms in the sixties. Divorces were plugging the system because they had become so easily
obtainable and presented so many incentives for gaining financial advantages for the litigants and the legal
industry.
Of course, the family courts would be flooded and overloaded just the same if it weren't for the fact that
equitable and just judicial procedures such as jury trials and the rules of evidence had been deliberately
omitted from the family court procedures that were put in place.
It is therefore no surprise that lawyers commonly refer to a family court as "kangaroo court," except when
the lawyers become family court judges. Then they want judicial immunity from prosecution for the abuses and
denial of due process of the law that the family court system routinely perpetrates.
To help US citizens address these problems, Children's Best Interest
created a Citizen's Guide to the Judiciary, so
that they may be able to elect proper judges who honestly and judiciously act in the best interest of the
children.
Fatherhood
Chief Youth Court Judge Andrew Beecroft yesterday identified six characteristics of serious youth
offenders: 85 percent are male, the majority have no contact with their father, 80 percent do not go to
school and have chronic drug or alcohol addictions, most have psychological or psychiatric issues, and 50
percent – up to 90 percent in some courts – are Maori.
(Full Story)
Fathers
Rights:
Sir Geldof on Fathers
Rights, U.K. Channel 4 - Tuesday 12th,
The Real Love That Dare Not Speak It's Name — a very moving and
convincing account of the social and legal prejudices that marginalize fathers and what impact that has on
children and society It's Official: The
Experiment Has Failed
Experiments
in Living: The Fatherless Family
By Rebecca O'Neill; Sept. 2002, CIVITAS
For the best part of thirty years we have been conducting a vast experiment with the family,
and now the results are in: the decline of the two-parent, married-couple family has resulted in poverty,
ill-health, educational failure, unhappiness, anti-social behaviour, isolation and social exclusion for
thousands of women, men and children.
— Rebecca O'Neill
The impact of father absence on our children
Facts
and Figures
Fatherlessness: The Root
Cause
The link between crime and fatherlessness is astonishing.
By Dave Kopel, Independence
Institute, article at FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News
Forum"
Full Story
Study Finds Teen Pregnancy And Crime Levels Are Higher Among Kids From
Fatherless Homes
Father
Facts
What happens when you take Dad out of the family picture?
A daily dose of reality from the National Fatherhood
Initiative. (Take the time to look at the home page for the URL. It contains a lot of good information )
Earnings not limited by income of father
Many factors influence pay of offspring: study Article by Luiza Chwialkowska, National Post,
Friday, November 06, 1998
It appears that family circumstances, such as the presence of a father in the live of a child, and
whether the parents moved during the development of a child are controlling influences on the future incomes
earned by a child and his social circumstances when he/she is in the prime of his/her life.
The article is no longer available at the website of the
National Post
In what year was the study done that showed that even male college students responded as readily and
accurately to baby cries as women? Who conducted the 1998 study that found that the reason women initiate over twice the divorces as men
was the expectation of winning sole custody? What would be your 10 points for forming a co-parenting plan?
See the new fatherhood site for the answers to
those questions.
________________________
See also:
Divorce
Each year, over 1 million American children suffer the divorce of their parents;
moreover, half of the children born this year to parents who are married will see their parents divorce
before they turn 18. Mounting evidence in social science journals demonstrates that the devastating
physical, emotional, and financial effects that divorce is having on these children will last well into
adulthood and affect future generations.
|
Fiscal conservatives should realize that federal and state
governments spend $150 billion per year to subsidize and sustain single-parent families. By contrast, only
$150 million is spent to strengthen marriage.
|
Thus, for every $1,000 spent to deal with the effects of family
disintegration, only $1 is spent to prevent that disintegration.
|
See also:
Extended Family
Family Violence
(Check the Family Violence Index Page )
After more than thirty years of propaganda directed by family-hostile feminists against men, and after
increasing escalation of that propaganda during the last dozen years or so — ever since radical gender
activists took over the women's liberation movement — it seems that men "the abusers, batterers, beasts,
brutes and rapists" are not even part of the human race, and any women who still fraternize with them are
being considered traitors to "the race of women."
Although society's perception of family violence has much to do with the sexes, in as much as it has done
an enormous amount of damage to our families by polarizing gender issues and even creating issues that never
throughout human history were of much concern to humanity until men became sufficiently demonized and vilified
through the propaganda efforts of the radical feminists
(a.k.a. redfems), family
violence has nothing to do with the sexes. It is an equal-opportunity crime in which a few, very few
aberrational individuals from both sexes engage to equal extents.
Family violence is a human failing. It is gender-neutral, or, if anything, more often committed by women
than by men. The tragic consequences of the propaganda war against men and families are that the violence
against men has become invisible, and the suffering of those of our children who are being tortured, maimed
and murdered by their biological mothers is being ignored, ostensibly to safeguard women and "in the best
interest of our children." However, two thirds of child abuse is being committed by biological mothers of the
children, with natural fathers being nine times less likely to abuse their children.
Eeva Sodhi responds to the inauguration of Shelternet, an Ontario-based and nationally funded
Internet resource for abused women.
As an "abused" woman, Eeva Sodhi voices very strong reservations.
Full Story See also:
Sex Education
— by Barbara Dafoe Whitehead (on the failure of sex
education)
Families and Taxes
Fatherlessness!
It's Official: The Experiment Has Failed
Experiments in Living: The Fatherless Family
By Rebecca O'Neill; Sept. 2002, CIVITAS
For the best part of thirty years we have been conducting a vast experiment with the family,
and now the results are in: the decline of the two-parent, married-couple family has resulted in poverty,
ill-health, educational failure, unhappiness, anti-social behaviour, isolation and social exclusion for
thousands of women, men and children.
— Rebecca O'Neill -
Fatherlessness — The impact on our children — Facts and Figures
Fatherlessness: The Root Cause — The
link between crime and fatherlessness is astonishing. — By Dave Kopel,
Independence Institute, article at
FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum"
Fatherless Homes — Article
in the March/April Issue of The Liberator
Many factors influence pay of offspring: study Article by Luiza Chwialkowska, National Post,
Friday, November 06, 1998
It appears that family circumstances, such as the presence of a father in the live of a child, and
whether the parents moved during the development of a child are controlling influences on the future incomes
earned by a child and his social circumstances when he/she is in the prime of his/her life.
The onslaught on
The Japanese Family
See also The myth of the oppressed Japanese woman
and
Parents'
rights a demographic issue, by COLIN P.A. JONES, Special to The Japan
Times, Tuesday, July 18, 2006
Full Story
What happens when you take Dad out
of the family picture? A daily dose of reality from the National Fatherhood Initiative. (Take the time to
look at the home page for the URL. It contains a lot of good information )
Full Story
Comments
By
Richard Lessner, Manchester, New Hampshire, Union Leader, August 12, 1998
Full Story
________________________
See also:
Fathers and "The Patriarchy"
Quotes from-, and comments on, Michael Crichton's
The Great
Train Robbery
Conditions for men working on the construction
of the Canadian Railroad system Full Story
Far back in history, Aristotle had opinions about politics and on how they, the
economy, society and morals were impacted by excessive rights and powers of women.
Full Story
"As a splendid lesson in discipline to his army, the King of Prussia ordered the glorious
story to be read on parade at the head of every regiment in his service."
- On the other hand, women are being trained to expect men to make the ultimate sacrifice, to give their
lives for the salvation of women.
Alistair MacLean tells in his collection of short stories The Lonely Sea,* how men time and again
repeated such heroic performances and sacrificed their lives to save those of women and children, when ships
sank beneath the waves of the ocean.
______________
* Alistair MacLean, The Lonely Sea, Collected Short Stories (About men at sea, rescues from sinking
ships, etc.), Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City, New York, 1986, ISBN 0-385-23596-8, 226 pages, hardcover
Full Story
Fathers Now and Then — a collection of articles by people writing about fathers and
their fathers
He was — living from 1886 to 1952 — a product of the
Victorian Age. — By Walter Schneider
Full Story
The New Dads — excerpt from a speech by Judy Anderson,
president of REAL Women, Toronto, May 26, 1997
Feminism and Families
A book by Dale O'Learythat explains the sinister strategy— firmly rooted in communist ideology— for
the planned destruction of our families
and the role that the UN and the seemingly innocent word gender plays in it. The Gender Agenda is a
book that chronicles the successful efforts of radical extremist feminists in using various UN conventions to
further their insidious agenda: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Cairo, Egypt, and Beijing, China. (Not covered in the
book are Human Habitat II, at Istanbul, Turkey, and the
discussions in Rome, Italy relating to the
International Criminal Court — both
very much targets, too, of the destructive and insidious gender agenda of
the
radical feminists)
Related links:
Full Story
First, Consider this.
That chapter "The Politics of Sex: Radical Feminism's Assault on American Culture" from Robert Bork's book
provides insights as to why gender feminism is bad for our society in as much as it fosters a climate of
propaganda against men and all things male that would earn the accolades of Josef Goebbels for a job
well-done. Full Story
_______________
Note: If the term "radical feminism" (a.k.a. Marxist- or
socialist-feminism) is somewhat new to you, you need to expand your
knowledge. After all, radical feminism, the currently
controlling faction of feminism, governs just about everything that
is happening in your life. See,
Carey Roberts column
Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on political
correctness. His best-known work was an exposé on Marxism and
radical feminism.
Carey Roberts' best-known work, his exposé on Marxism and
radical feminism, is not necessarily easy to find, but
this link will help with that. (Some of the URLs for the
article series appear to keep changing. For that reason the
identified link leads to an Internet search for the series. The
first or second link in the return list will most likely lead you to
the series.)
Humanity is experiencing the opening phase of mass Gendercide.
Homicide the deliberate killing of a person. Genocide The deliberate killing of a people or a nation. Gendercide The deliberate killing of a gender.
Standing accused are:
Those who have promoted and profited by injustice and hatred. Those who have denigrated, denied and destroyed love between men, women and children. Those who have conspired to deny the future rights of the unborn. Those who have conspired to destroy the lives and opportunities of millions. Those who have stolen the children, the homes and hard-earned emotional and financial investments of
millions. Those who have lied and perverted the truth and used the sufferings of men, women and children to obtain
advantage and to promote and impose evil ideologies on humanity. Those who have taken the wealth and the trust of millions and claimed to be defenders of the global
environment. Those who have blindly ignored the truth and the reality of the crimes being committed in their name,
remained silent and have done nothing.
These people are charged, in the name of all humanity, with the crime of Gendercide.
Full text at The Head of the Medusa
________________________
See also the Table of Contents
for Feminism and Related Issues
Frequently-asked Questions __________
Updates:
2007 07 29 (added entry for WHY MEN ARE THE
WAY THEY ARE) |
