Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search


 
Site Map (very large file)
Table of Contents
Activism
Children—Our most valued assets?
Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
Child Support
Civil Rights & Social Issues
Families
Family Law
Destruction of Families
Fatherhood
Fatherlessness
Divorce Issues
Domestic Violence
Feminism
Gay Issues
Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
Health
Help Lines for Men
History
Humour
Law, Justice and The Judiciary
Mail to F4L
Men's Issues
Suicide
The Politics of "Sex"
Our Most Popular Pages
Email List
Links
References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

 

 
 
 

Family Law — Table of Contents


Introduction

Contents

Canadian Legal Information Institution (Off-site; Canadian court decisions, access is free)

Families and the Justice System — Index

Family Law News

Introductory Comments

Families and the Justice System

In today's society, modern liberals, family-hostile feminists and do-gooders dominate and control the justice system to wage an all-out war on our families. The objective appears to be to remove fathers from the lives of their children. If that concerns you — it should — and if you labour under the illusion that men and their children can obtain equitable justice in the courts, well, think again! Check the Families and the Justice System Index

A note about the family courts:

The family court system was set up in the late sixties to alleviate the burden on the civil- and criminal courts. The vastly increased number of divorces that those courts had to deal with then resulted from the divorce-law reforms in the sixties. Divorces were plugging the system because they had become so easily obtainable and presented so many incentives for gaining financial advantages for the litigants and the legal industry.

Of course, the family courts would be flooded and overloaded just the same if it weren't for the fact that equitable and just judicial procedures such as jury trials and the rules of evidence had been deliberately omitted from the family court procedures that were put in place.

It is therefore no surprise that lawyers commonly refer to a family court as "kangaroo court," except when the lawyers become family court judges. Then they want judicial immunity from prosecution for the abuses and denial of due process of the law that the family court system routinely perpetrates.

To help US citizens address these problems, Children's Best Interest created a Citizen's Guide to the Judiciary, so that they may be able to elect proper judges who honestly and judiciously act in the best interest of the children.

Feminists have been among the most active of the Court Party groups, usually by invoking section 15 of the Charter which prohibits discrimination based on "race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability." (In 1995 in the Egan case, the court added or 'read in" sexual orientation to the list.) Of the 47 feminist cases brought to court between 1982 and 1996, 72% were successful. These included cases on abortion, discrimination in the private sector and pornography. In the Butler pornography case, feminists successfully argued that erotic material was pornographic if it objectified women, not because it offended public morality. At least one feminist testified as an expert witness to support the "artistic merit" claim in Robin Sharpe's 2002 child-pornography trial.

The Report Newsmagazine (now Citizens Centre Report), a Canadian independent conservative newsmagazine, is an avid supporter of families and promoter of pro-family discussions.  Check out a sample of articles from The Report.

 

Judas.gif (25786 bytes)
A Men's Problem

Back to Table of Contents for Family Law

__________________

See also:

  • Table of Contents for feminism and related issues

  • From Marxism to Feminism: The planned destruction of the American family
    Statement of Bill Wood
    FC-8 Hearing on Waste, Fraud, and Abuse July 17, 2003
    TESTIMONY FOR THE [US] WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE

    The planned destruction of the family was part of the communist agenda from its inception by Karl Marx and Frederic Engels.   It became government policy in the USSR in about 1917. It was so successful in the USSR that it threatened to destroy society in the USSR.  Curiously, while in the 1940s the USSR took steps to repair the damages its family-hostile policies had caused, American communists imported the Soviet agenda for the planned destruction of the family into the USA.  It has been and continues to be promoted by left-leaning liberals in the West ever since.

    When it was determined that this type of class warfare directed at the family was a complete failure, the Soviets worked quickly to restore the traditional nuclear family in the 1940’s.  Shortly after this, the NAWL (National Association of Women Lawyers) began their push for adopting these failed Soviet policies in America. America’s version of “family law” has adopted much of the early Soviet failed version of class warfare, while adopting new and more insidious Gramscian versions with gender, cultural, and social warfare components. 

    From Bill Wood's testimony to the
    Ways and Means Committee

whiterose.gif (6796 bytes)The White Rose
Thoughts are Free

__________________
Posted 2003 05 02
Updates:
2003 08 01 (added reference to From Marxism to Feminism: The planned destruction of the American family)