Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness — a large and serious social problem 
| HOME (Perseus) | HOME (Fathers for Life) | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us|

Fathers for Life Site-Search

Site Map (very large file)
Table of Contents
Children—Our most valued assets?
Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
Child Support
Civil Rights & Social Issues
Family Law
Destruction of Families
Divorce Issues
Domestic Violence
Gay Issues
Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
Help Lines for Men
Law, Justice and The Judiciary
Mail to F4L
Men's Issues
The Politics of "Sex"
Our Most Popular Pages
Email List
References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001


Humanarchy, Chapter 3 - The Children Of The Great Lie


...continued, from CHAPTER TWO – Belief and Fear, Part 3


CHAPTER THREE – The Children Of The Great Lie

Human beings do not like to be told that they are dumb animals. We imagine that we have minds and thoughts of our own. Our greatest achievement among all the species that inhabit our world is that we can think and reason, free of blind instinct and dogma, we are individuals and we hold our individual thoughts as our most precious, sacred possessions.

Throughout history there have been those who have tried to change this most fundamental human right. Sinister regimes have risen up and tried to enslave our minds, to replace our individual thoughts with their own, but we as free thinking human individuals have risen up against them and after much spilling of blood have quashed and destroyed their evil intentions.

Regimes like Communism – a political movement based on the writings and ideas of one Karl Marx – advocated the abolition of private ownership and that all work and property should be shared by the community. But, if you’d happened to be a peasant in Tsarist Russia you would have easily gone along with such a revolutionary concept. In 1945, if you were a returning British soldier, the idea must have appealed equally. Today, the ideas of Karl Marx are discredited as oppression, the socialist Utopia he gave birth to seen as a murderous totalitarian regime, responsible for the deaths of millions.

We are surely not dumb cattle, blind to everything except the grass on the trail ahead of our rooting noses. We see the world as it truly is and we make free choices about how we live don’t we? It’s all there in our newspapers and on the news broadcasts – the real world around us. We know what is happening in the world and we, in the free western world are lucky. We have democracy!

Democracy – a shining, white knight of a word – held aloft like a crusader’s banner, sweeping the world free of dictatorships, totalitarian regimes, overthrowing the oppressor, the enslaver. Democracy is the good guys – democracy is us, isn’t it?


Ideas – especially individual ideas are clearly contrary to the well being and stability of the herd. But widely held beliefs are essential, because they help keep the herd plodding along. But as history continually demonstrates, seemingly altruistic ideas and beliefs are almost always hijacked. In every age the hijacking and manipulation of good ideas is what keeps us moving along like docile animals.

If we believe that our wishes are being implemented by those that govern us, we see no need to revolt. Like a plane full of innocent passengers on vacation – an idea or a belief with a gun at its head can take the hi-jackers and their hostages wherever they want to go – and usually, it is not to some distant island in the sun – usually, it’s to a very, very dark place – a place that is surprisingly close to home.

But we know who the good guys are and we know who the enemy is, don’t we? Our leaders wouldn’t take us to war if it were not absolutely essential would they? Time and again our leaders tell us they are willing to go that extra mile for peace – we are not the instigators of war – we are the defenders of democracy right?

Democracy is defined as a system of government, or organisation in which its citizens or members choose their leaders and make other important decisions by voting. So we get to vote on who runs things – but how do they run things? How does democracy really work?

Democracy is the art of running the circus from the monkey cage.

— H. L. Mencken

We assume that Communism and Nazism have been the most destructive regimes of the 20th century. They were both defeated at the cost of many, many millions of human lives and now they are, by and large, consigned to history – or so we believe.
  1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose.

The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management.

  1. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

Misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. "Paying your fair share."

  1. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or the reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

  1. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

Government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process.

  1. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

The Federal Reserve which is a credit/debt system nationally organized by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Federal system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

  1. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the State.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.

  1. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of wastelands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

Corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

  1. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

The Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.

  1. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.

The Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136.

  1. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.

People are being taxed to support 'public' schools, which train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education".

In the ‘Land of the Free’ and the ‘Home of the Brave’ – the USA today, all ten planks of the Communist Manifesto

In the year 1993, men of the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, wearing black uniforms, "coal-scuttle" helmets and carrying German-made machine pistols attacked the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas. They were searching for illegal arms that had been reported by a paid informer to be hidden in the Branch Davidian compound. The U.S. media informed the American people that the Branch Davidians were an evil cult that engaged in sexual rituals involving children. The Branch Davidians had kept to themselves and harmed no one outside their compound prior to the attack. The BATF invited the U.S. news media to film the BATF assault to show how dangerous the Branch Davidians were.

After initially encountering fierce resistance, the BATF called up military units with armoured vehicles to destroy the Branch Davidian compound.

Such things happen in our crazy mixed up world, don’t they? Things like this, for example?

In the year 1943, soldiers of Heinrich Himmler’s SS, wearing black uniforms, "coal scuttle" helmets and carrying German-made machine pistols attacked the Jewish compound in Warsaw. They were searching for illegal arms that had been reported by a paid informer to be hidden in the Warsaw Ghetto. The Nazi news media had told the German people that the Jews practised an evil religion and engaged in sexual rituals involving children. The Jews had kept to themselves and harmed no one outside the ghetto prior to the SS attack. The SS filmed the assault to show the German public how dangerous the Jews were.

After initially encountering fierce resistance, the SS called up military units with armoured vehicles to destroy the Warsaw Ghetto.

The American people were left in no doubt who the bad guys were – as were the German people fifty years earlier. From our present perspective, things seem a little different though, don’t they – or do they?

Hmmm. Things not quite as clear as they used to be? Questioning the credibility of those things that we believe in, the things that underpin our society and our whole lives is a disturbing business isn’t it? It’s also a little scary, but hey, this is nothing – it’s going to get scarier yet – I promise you.

In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

— attr. George Orwell

In the year of my birth an Englishman wrote a book that changed the world. It was translated into 60 languages, made into a movie and at least one major TV production. It was read and discussed in thousands of schools and universities all over the world. It has sold more than 20million copies and continues to sell. It’s title is known far beyond the boundaries of those who have actually read it and many of its concepts and its words have become part of our language, known to us all. It’s contents stand in judgement against all aspects of political thinking and social structure, giving us such terms as Big Brother, the Thought Police, Newspeak and Doublethink. Even its author’s name has become an adjective that describes a chilling, nightmare – the book was George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four.

To believe that the fictional nightmare world of George Orwell has come into existence – here and now in our own time is ridiculous isn’t it? Surely such a thing is incredible?

1984 is a brilliant work of modern mythology that provides us with a language that allows us to name and give form to some of the madness that exists now in our world. And that madness is no myth. As we have seen, sanity is a myth, democracy is a myth, freedom is a myth and so too is belief.

Orwell’s vision is with us now. It is not confined to the passing regimes of Communism and Nazism.

You could also hear the Newspeak jargon at any NATO briefing, where military bureaucrats sweep aside dead civilians under the neat phrase "collateral damage". The telescreen tells us what we may think and believe and we under constant electronic surveillance. Our movements are tracked by thousands of cameras in shops, streets and offices; computers can monitor our every electronic transaction. Few people realise that more than 20 per cent of all the billions of e-mails sent are scrutinised by FBI agents.(a) And don’t kid yourself that there cannot possibly be that many people snooping into our private messages. Specially designed computer programmes that hunt for key words and phrases can monitor millions of messages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year non stop and now that the cold war is over the main threat comes from the enemy within – us.

Anything you send over the Internet is liable to be read… Intelligence-gathering agents in the US will follow messages which they think may be of interest to them.

— Duncan Campbell, a surveillance officer for the European Parliament.


The New World Order, the One World Super-state is here – whether we want it or not. We have no choice in the matter – no democratic vote on how it will be run, or who will run it. Those things have been settled without our involvement and our knowledge. Neither will we have any choice in the way our new world is managed and governed. There will be no opportunity to elect, dismiss or replace our real leaders. No way to influence policy, good or bad. No say as to what is right or wrong. In our ignorance and our apathy we have been left out of the business of managing ourselves – the human race. All decisions will be made for us. The human herd is being driven like never before. Did you ever hear of the drovers giving the herd a vote as to where they were going?

This aspect of the future is worrying enough, but there are more sinister implications for us if we can be bothered to take our eyes off our TV sets and look at what is coming. The global village is not the friendly, altruistic Utopia we have been sold. As the details become clearer we can see that it uncannily resembles the nightmare world of Orwell’s vision. In fact it’s not so much a village at all. It’s more like a concentration camp.

Can we honestly believe that we going to be the subjects of a just and benevolent form of government that will feed the hungry, house the homeless, cure the sick and be respectful of our human rights? If that is the truth then why are we – the citizens – regarded as the enemy?

Why are we being watched, tagged and monitored?

Why are we being left out of the decision making process?

Why are we being fed propaganda and lies instead of truth?

Why has one whole half of the human race been given rights that guarantee their health, their safety and their well-being in the New World Order, while the other half has increasingly fallen victim to discriminatory legislation, lack of health care, lack of justice, oppressive criminal sentencing and are being deliberately deprived of their children and their wealth, made homeless and imprisoned.

Why has one half of humanity been redefined so as to have sole ownership of children, to have the legal right to be housed, to have the legal right not to be used as slaves, not to have to fight in a war, and to live free from violence – to even have her individual integrity protected by law?

Is this really the New World Order’s idea of equality and justice or are we missing something obvious here?

We only have to look at the analogy of the herd. Not the natural, wild migrating herds of our pre-history, but the fat domesticated cattle that munch the green grass on the well ordered farms and ranches. We should remember how domestic cattle are reared and managed – because to those who drive us we are nothing but cattle – human cattle. Did it ever occur to you that those neatly fenced fields contain nothing but cows?


The threat that "Big Brother is watching you" is no bluff in our present society. Our Thought Police may not be as menacing as Orwell's, but they exist just the same. In the media, the academic world and the social services you find them gleefully terrorising anyone who dares to entertain forbidden ideas. The new heresies of sexism and racism will get you excommunicated without trial. They will defend you if you are one colour and persecute you if you are the other. They will protect you if you are of the female or indeterminate gender but not if you are male.

There is no court of appeal in this inquisition. A word spoken in jest or a misrepresented remark can end a career, put a man in jail without evidence, drive a man to suicide – if he is a certain kind of man that is. The new inquisition that so ruthlessly extols the virtues of a non-sexist, non-racist, non-judgmental creed will happily judge you and destroy you if you happen to be male, white and heterosexual. For you are the enemy – you are to blame for all the hellfire and damnation that has rained down upon the Earth. Global warming, environmental destruction, the population explosion, all are crimes against minorities and indigenous peoples and of course – the victims of the eternal holocaust – women.

Just as Orwell predicted, we have become so intimidated by these guardians of the new morality – or more accurately the non-morality – that we have been forced to censor ourselves. A dangerous thought pops into our minds and we suppress it like superstitious medieval peasants, not daring to invite the righteous anger of the Politically Correct Party of Truth.

Today, ideology and theory are the tools of the inquisitors and the excuse for the abuse of power. People without the moral courage or intellect, hide their love of power behind a supposed love of justice and truth, and justify it under the name of communism, nationalism, fascism, or feminism. It really doesn’t matter any more – the distinctions are gone – the edges blurred. They seem all to be one and the same.

Big Brother – or more accurately today – Big Sister – triumphs because so many of her subjects surrender to her cult of power politics, giving up their right to be an individual, human being, capable of making their own decisions and judgments and too morally weak to define a morality of their own. It’s easier and safer to go with the herd. But, if we are honest with ourselves we might admit that we are scared – too scared to ask just where exactly we are being driven to.

Every dictator who ever ruled by outright fear and oppression was intrinsically stupid, for by his own blatant oppression he practically guaranteed that the underdogs would rise up against him – eventually. Those that govern us today are far from stupid. The sensible way to rule is with the consent of the people. Give them what they want and they will follow – what ever it is, whether it’s a nice shiny car to drive, a colour TV set, or a shoe box home in a ersatz village in suburbia. Give them a post in a university teaching the new religion, a job as a court welfare officer or a social worker and like the ever watchful block leaders of the Nazi party, you can guarantee they will zealously enforce the inquisition upon their inferiors. They have to justify their own existence.
  • Rule one – always to give the people the illusion of autonomy – the belief that they actually control and have influence over their own lives.

    We have it – the illusion that we vote with our free will to elect who we want to run things.

  • Rule two – Give them something to believe in.

    We have it – Eco-Creed is the new, secular world religion.

  • Rule three – identify the enemy. There has to be an enemy – even in peacetime. In Communist Russia it was the Capitalists. In Nazi Germany it was the Jews. In the post war Western world, it was the Cold War baddies of Russia, China, North Korea and North Vietnam. Confusing, isn’t it? But who is the enemy now? Who is the oppressor? Who is the rapist, the murderer, the bouncer of babies on bayonets today?

    We have it. It’s incredible but it’s true – he is your husband, your father, or your brother. He is the man or the boy next door. He is your nephew or your son and if you yourself are male – he is YOU.


Every major horror of history was committed in the name of an altruistic motive. Has any act of selfishness ever equalled the carnage perpetrated by disciples of altruism?

— Ayan Rand

The Creation Of The Modern, Urban Myth.

If you attack stupidity you attack an entrenched interest with friends in government and every walk of public life, and you will make small progress against it.

— Samual Marchbanks

Most of us are not liars or con men. We tend believe that what we are told is the truth. We are brought up to believe that telling the truth is important and even though we may forgive our parents for misinforming us about Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy, we generally accept that they were not habitual liars.

We also expect those in authority – teachers, doctors, public officials, policemen and lawyers to be honest. But politicians? Do we really believe that politicians are honest? If so – then why the hell do we vote for them – any of them? We learn by experience, as we progress through life that not only is it feasible that many people lie to us, the chances are that almost everybody is lying to us – but somehow, we just can’t bring ourselves to actually believe it. Could it be that we are actually deluding ourselves?

There is an amusing urban myth that Queen Elizabeth the Second is under the illusion that the whole of the United Kingdom of Great Britain smells of new paint. This myth grew up because wherever she travels and visits in the United Kingdom there is a frenzy of tidying, cleaning and refurbishing so that the Royal sensibilities may not be offended by anything dilapidated, dirty or malodorous. Consequently, the Royal nose has become so accustomed to the odour of fresh paint that Her Majesty assumes her entire realm is imbued with this pungent fragrance.

Of course, there is no credible evidence to support this modern myth – but as with all myths, there is an inherent message. The British people, who are perhaps sometimes reluctant to criticise their monarchy openly, have found an amusing way to express their contempt.

We live in an age rife with modern myths, but unlike their predecessors from history some of the most prevalent of these modern myths are not the purveyors of an inherent truth – in fact they are nothing but downright lies that have been deliberately engineered to misinform us.


Most of these deliberately structured falsehoods can conveniently be rounded up and placed under one heading. This also happens to demonstrate their widely held credence, their single point of origin and their blatant stupidity. Let’s call this Super-myth the Cultural Collateral Factor – for want of a better term. The Cultural Collateral Factor may be a myth, but to a large portion of the populations of the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia and New Zealand – it exists as a perceived truth. Why? Because it is continually being given credence, not only by those who benefit from it, but by those who govern us – our politicians.


The Oppressed Minorities
  • Middle Class Women (and their children)

  • Lesbians and Homosexuals

  • Lower class women

  • ‘Women Of Colour’

  • Blacks (male)

  • Other Immigrants

The Oppressors

  • White Male Heterosexuals (of all classes)

The above table seems a crazy way to view human society, but this is in fact the way many so called intelligent people do actually view things. You will find this view prevalent in most universities, in the legal system and even in our governments. You will also find it enshrined in all stratas of the Women’s Movement, the Environmental Movement and in the ‘Human Rights’ movement as well as prevalent in some quarters of the Christian church. It is also the view promulgated throughout the media – on TV, radio, in our newspapers and magazines as well as in the movies. It is the dogmatic catechism of the new belief system – the Eco-Creed.

Consequently, the benefits, rights and sympathies that our society and its various organisations may bestow upon its citizens line up the same way. As a middle-class woman you will be healthier, live longer have better access to justice, education, welfare, housing and just about everything else you can think of – you will also have a significantly increased life expectancy. In other words your Cultural Collateral level is high. Your chances of getting any of the above decreases the further down the column your particular ‘group’ is.

But, if you are a member of the single group on the right – you will have far less cultural collateral than any of those on the left – but, by some bizarre mechanism you are deemed as the ‘oppressor’ group.

It is therefore no surprise that the group at the top of the left-hand column claim to be the most oppressed but are in fact the most un-oppressed group in the whole of western society. This is the group that contains the largest proportion of feminists who naturally campaign so loudly against the ‘oppressors’ in the right hand column. By assigning themselves a victim group identity they successfully lay claim to funding, high salaried posts in the academic world and influential positions within government. They also further bolster their credibility and their cultural collateral by allying themselves with the other groups in the left-hand list, thereby giving themselves yet more power to spread yet more lies. They have to – their existence – and their pay cheques depend on it.

These are lies that are presented to the public as truths and repeated constantly through the mediums of soap opera, movies and advertising so it is no wonder that many people believe them to be facts. Even if people do not consciously take these lies seriously, they have been conditioned to accept them and to generally believe them. Most people will not even be interested in questioning such dogma unless they find themselves in the position of being a victim of the cultural collateral groups themselves. After all these are not lies emanating from a few spike haired lesbians on some inner city college campus – these are ‘facts’ distributed from authoritative sources – government departments, Universities and research foundations. These are established views.

Yet if we look at the situation without the bright red spectacles of the Marxist radical feminist [more accurately called redfem —F4L] movement it is impossible to view middle class women as an oppressed minority. Apart from fact they make up a significant numerical majority in the US they have an abundance of statutory laws which provide them with a consistently significant advantage in all areas of the law. They spend 70% of every dollar spent and are the last ones to end up as homeless. They get the kids in 90+% of divorce cases and they get the entitlement that is associated with that. They are also far less likely to be imprisoned, murdered, suffer violence, illness or an accident. They also have a considerably higher life expectancy.

In fact, middle class women have such a pre-eminent position in American culture that they do not need a voice, even though they shout the loudest and longest about their mythical oppression – while naturally being funded by the American tax-payer to do so. They ARE the voice of western culture and they are not going to keep quiet – their pay cheques depend on it.

Lesbians and homosexuals have utilised the same strategies as the feminists and have large, well-organised voices as well as a very sympathetic media that promotes their causes. Though some might say they have more of a claim to victimhood, it has to remembered that the bulk of any past ‘oppression’ emanated from the cultural norms of the times rather than outright prejudice and violence.

Nevertheless, these groups have organised effectively and campaigned successfully to such an extent that there is now widespread general acceptance if not widespread approval of their lifestyles. Furthermore, strict protective legislation has been widely introduced to protect their rights and monitoring and affirmative action programs introduced to lift all ‘oppression’ – perceived or otherwise. They are not going to keep quiet either – their pay cheques depend on it.

Lower class women tend to stay that way – unless they marry up the social scale. Even so, they benefit from the same legislation and perceptions as middle class women, much as black women – or ‘Women of Colour’ as the women’s movement defines them, benefit from both feminism and the Black Power movement. Black men or women have the added bonus of having the legally enforced ‘right’ to promote their colour as a political weapon.

Black organisations, even black supremacist organisations are freely allowed and considered virtuous, whereas white, even white ‘equality’ organisations are branded as ‘racist’ – a ridiculous double standard that serves only to create conflict. As a distinct racial group, black people have been the beneficiaries of some $5.64 trillion dollars of US tax-payers money over the last 40 years. Clearly, that is one hell of a pay cheque.

Similarly, large immigrant populations have been freely allowed to grow up in the largely white, Anglo-Saxon countries. These peoples presumably migrated to improve their lives or escape persecutions in some cases, so considering where they came from, they get a hell of a lot of benefits – clean water, housing, employment and a chance to start up the ladder to the American dream. After all, all Americans were immigrants at one time. Wherever they originate from, they are freely allowed to bring their cultures, religions and customs with them. These are protected by law, even when they conflict with the laws, cultures and customs of their host nations – who do not have their cultures, religions and customs likewise protected.

Again, the double standards are about as blatant and punitive to the so-called ‘white oppressors’ as they can get, causing even more jealousies, injustices and conflict. One would think, that for the supposedly intelligent people who govern us, such divisive and antagonistic policies would seem a dam good way to entrench inequalities and ferment intolerance and violence. Surely that can’t be the real reason they promote these cultural collateral myths, can it? Think about it.

Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.

— George Orwell, 1984

The Ten Eco-Creed Commandments

Thou shalt:

  1. Regard all racial and sexual minorities as sacrosanct and refrain from any criticism of them.

  2. Treat women as a minority, though they constitute 51 per cent of the population.

  3. Blame all society's ills on the white, heterosexual, male "majority".

  4. Deplore all discrimination, unless it is specifically designed to disadvantage the "majority".

  5. Insist that the "majority" is by nature racist and sexist and devise ways to control its behaviour.

  6. Ignore any comments by minorities about the "majority", or about each other, which might suggest that they too sometimes have racist and sexist tendencies.

  7. Place no importance upon truth, accuracy or consistency of argument, for the next commandment makes these inconveniences unnecessary.

  8. Silence all dissenters with a system of legal penalties, social vilification and ridicule.

  9. Pretend that political correctness is simply about politeness.

  10. Rejoice in your moral superiority.

The Ten Commandments of political correctness by Don Bruce.
These were published in the letters to the editor of The Sunday Age newspaper on August 10, 1997.


Now we come to the single group in the right-hand box. These are the enemy, the bad guys. It must be so because here are some of the ‘truths’ that are freely expounded by the groups on the left about them:


All of the above statements are clearly blatant lies as any realistic assessment of the true facts and statistics will graphically illustrate, but they are continually repeated by powerful women’s lobby groups, radical lesbian organisations, taught in our universities and promoted by our media. They are repeated so often that it really doesn’t matter if they are lies – in the minds of the masses they exist as truth.

Like the Radio Project study showed, if you repeat things often enough they will stick in the public mind, but why should anyone have a vested interest in promoting such utter bilge as the ‘fact’ "All men are rapists" or "Only women suffer domestic violence"? Only someone with a pathological hatred of men of course, yet our governments continue to pour millions of dollars into the very organisations that promote such hatred and insanity.

And it goes far deeper. Almost everywhere you look throughout western society there are War Schools for women. Places where women go to learn how to hate. In the college or university they masquerade as Women’s Studies courses. In the esoteric New Age world of spiritual enlightenment they are called self-experience, discovery and therapy groups. They go under the name of ‘Assertiveness Training’ or more sinisterly ‘Self-Defence Training’. Almost all of these loosely described ‘women groups’ are nothing else but ad hoc military academies, staffed by dedicated and professional hate mongers to train ‘victim’ woman to survive the holocaust and to fight and overcome ‘oppressor’ man.

Well established and copiously funded militia networks plan the conflict, train for it in role games within their groups and learn everything they can about the enemy from their own propaganda. Organisations ostensibly in existence to help the perceived ‘weaker’ sex openly work tirelessly to destroy the hetero sexual family and the male/female unit. These twisted sisters actively promote lesbianism through ‘sexual discovery’ (masturbation classes) or bi-sexuality as a ‘safer’ alternative to the inherently destructive and oppressive patriarchy.

Most men, including the husbands, boy friends or partners of some of these deluded women assume that their women folk are doing something beneficial and constructive, indulging in a little harmless bonding and female friendship. They simply refuse to believe that there has been an unspoken declaration of war and that they are now the hated enemy. How can they? Such a concept is incredible to most men. Not to most women though. They are groomed for gender war from an early age. They are educated by women and taught that to be male is to be either stupid or evil. Every magazine, TV advertisement and movie roars a battle cry against the oppressor. Every talk show, every newspaper and every TV ‘comedy’ show prepares her for the final conflict – the war that she cannot avoid. The war in which she – so she is assured – is the eternal victim.

The War Schools feed their new recruits into the Domestic Violence Industry, the Rape Industry or the Sexual Harassment industry, or onward into the Divorce Industry where other male hate organisations are ready and waiting, eager to take over the baton. Legions of feminist or lesbian counsellors, attorneys and judges, foaming at the mouth in their lust for vengeance come next in the chain. They have a rich and varied range of male hate legislation to draw upon and oh, how the love to use those sharply honed weapons they have been given for ‘women’s protection’.

Many of the ‘crimes’ a man can be charged with do not require witnesses, evidence or even testimony. The divorce industry can draw on a whole range of male hate legislation to keep a man away from his children and steal his home. They can garnish his wages, take his car and his driving licence, put him on the street or in jail, accuse him of rape, child abuse, sexual abuse and have him black listed – all without the burdensome requirement of evidence or proof. He is male – therefore he is guilty. (In the US, there are an estimated 520,000 false rape allegations a year — 98.1% of all reported cases.  (Eeva Sodhi, Debunking Domestic Violence Statistics; Rape)

The male hate industry is vast and turns over millions of dollars of almost exclusively tax-payers money world wide – most of it supplied by the very people who are themselves being destroyed. The Domestic Violence Industry was the original launching pad for a world wide male hate campaign. Now it is the most powerful military instrument of gendercide ever to come into existence, the biggest spender and employer in the ever intensifying hate war against the male oppressor.

Gender cleansing – or more accurately GENDERCIDE is being driven internationally through the United Nations and is effectively implemented by all our governments – who freely encourage legions of lunatics and psychopathic, predominantly female, (but also male) hate warriors, to fight the viscous gender war to ‘liberate’ the oppressed female from the oppressive patriarchy. Their mission is to ensure that he is robbed of his children, his wealth and his freedom – to stomp him into the dirt where he belongs. And, if they do their work well enough, he will do everyone a favour and take his own life – thus saving untold numbers of oppressed women and girl children from any future oppression.

If we were to allow any other group in society to be treated this way we would accuse their persecutors of genocide. Do our governments then also have a pathological hatred of men? The answer can only be ‘yes’. Clearly, equality, justice, protection from violence, discrimination and other normal human rights do not extend to the male of the species. Man himself – and more specifically white, heterosexual man – is the last enemy. Can we really believe that there is a systematic program of genocide operating against him? Such an idea is sure too incredible to contemplate – isn’t it?

First, I had a credibility barrier to cross I had to own up to the fact that is was happening to me and that I shouldn't make excuses for the violence. The next barrier was getting the police to believe it. Fortunately, we lived in a small town and they often arrived in time to see with their own eyes. This still didn't convince some of them because they had their own credibility barriers to cross. Then later, when I was alone, my children, my home and my business gone, I had another barrier to cross fortunately, I was lucky and I did find others like me who had crossed those same credibility barriers.

Back then it was pretty revolutionary to go on TV programmes and admit that we were victims there were few enough of us who had crossed the barrier of courage, shame and public ridicule that it took to do this but we did it because we believed that the public and the authorities had a great big barrier of credibility to cross as well.

After some years of campaigning, meeting with police committees, appearing on TV, radio, writing articles, letters etc you have another barrier of credibility to cross. You have to accept that somewhere, somebody actually wants things this way. Then you realise that whoever ‘they’ are, they must have a pretty powerful hold on the media, the legal system and the government and that you are pissing in the wind as far as changing anything is concerned.

That is a hard barrier to cross hard because you have to admit that everything you did is a waste of time and effort and although you may have raised the threshold of awareness slightly the plain truth is it is deliberate policy to destroy the heterosexual family and turn men into some kind of lower order species.

After this stage is reached there comes a renewed sense of isolation. Why? Because you find that even some of your comrades in this fight do not see these barriers, let alone have the ability to climb over them. It's hard to see the superhuman efforts that some people make in their respective areas of this fight when you know that what ever small successes they achieve their efforts will be stomped under foot by the feminazi juggernaut. It's the sheer size and wealth as well as the power behind this thing that throws up another credibility barrier and the realisation that whatever we do whatever even our own politicians may do or say they are going to do it means nothing. The traditional heterosexual family is being deliberately destroyed. We are entering the 'Century of Women', Children are now owned by the World State. Women do have superior human rights to men. Men are being culturally exterminated.

I've been trying to raise awareness of these facts for the last few years and believe me, I understand how hard it is to breach the credibility barriers all of them. I had to climb them myself. For those who still fail to believe any of the above to those who may accuse me and others like me of being 'conspiracy nuts' and 'New World Order' freaks try and remember how hard it was to cross your own credibility barriers.

Was there a time when you didn't believe you would get divorced? Was there a time when you thought the law would give you and your children justice? Was there a time when you thought feminism really was a good thing and it was all about equality? We all have to cross those credibility barriers sooner or later.

— Male victim of Domestic Violence and the Divorce Industry.

Surely a statement such as ‘men are being culturally exterminated' is crazy. What sane society would do such a thing? What sane person would believe such an incredible statement?


The two sides of the same coins


CHRISTIANITY (and others)






Illustrated version of The Head of the Medusa

Humanarchy – The book about globalization

Write to Perseus

Posted 2000 04 19
2006 10 31 (reformated)